Optimization of microfluidization for the homogeneous distribution of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) in biopolymeric matrix

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 21 - Trang 3457-3468 - 2014
Avik Khan1, Khanh Dang Vu1, Gregory Chauve2, Jean Bouchard2, Bernard Riedl3, Monique Lacroix1
1Research Laboratories in Sciences Applied to Food, Canadian Irradiation Centre (CIC), INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Université du Québec, Laval, Canada
2FPInnovations, Pointe-Claire, Canada
3Département des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de Foresterie, Géographie et Géomatique, Université Laval, Québec-City, Canada

Tóm tắt

Microfluidization, which is a high-pressure homogenization technique, was used to develop highly dispersed cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) reinforced chitosan based nanocomposite films. A three factor central composite design with five levels was designed to systematically optimize the microfluidization process. The three factors were the CNC content, the microfluidization pressure and the number of microfluidization cycles. Response surface methodology was used to obtain relationship between the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite films and the factors. Polynomial equations were generated based on the regression analysis of the factors and the predicted properties of the nanocomposite films were in good agreement with the experimental results. Microfluidization effectively reduced the CNC–chitosan aggregates and improved the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite films. Microscopic analysis of the microfluidized nanocomposite films revealed a 10–15 times reduction in the size of the aggregates compared to the non-microfluidized CNC/chitosan films and an increase in the root mean square surface roughness (Rq).

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adjallé KD, Vu KD, Tyagi RD, Brar SK, Valéro JR, Surampalli RY (2011) Optimization of spray drying process for Bacillus thuringiensis fermented wastewater and wastewater sludge. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 34(2):237–246 ASTM, Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength of Plastics. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, 1999, Method D 638-99 Atalay YT, Vermeir S, Witters D, Vergauwe N, Verbruggen B, Verboven P, Nicolaï BM, Lammertyn J (2011) Microfluidic analytical systems for food analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol 22(7):386–404 Azeredo HMC, Mattoso LHC, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Filho GC, Munford ML, Wood D, McHugh TH (2010) Nanocellulose reinforced chitosan composite films as affected by nanofiller loading and plasticizer content. J Food Sci 75(1):N1–N7 Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Sanchez JY, Dufresne A (2004) Cellulose nanocrystals reinforced poly(oxyethylene). Polymer 45:4149–4157 Balachandran M, Devanathan S, Muraleekrishnan R, Bhagawan SS (2012) Optimizing properties of nanoclay–nitrile rubber (NBR) composites using Face Centered Central Composite Design. Mater Des 35:854–862 Beck-Candanedo S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2011) Controlling the reflection wavelength of iridescent solid films of nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 12(1):167–172 Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6(2):1048–1054 Berger J, Reist M, Mayer J, Felt O, Gurny R (2004) Structure and interactions in chitosan hydrogels formed by complexation or aggregation for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 57(1):35–52 Chen J, Liang R, Liu W, Li T, Liu C, Wu S, Wang Z (2013) Pectic-oligosaccharides prepared by dynamic high-pressure microfluidization and their in vitro fermentation properties. Carbohydr Polym 91(1):175–182 De Mesquita JP, Donnici CL, Pereira FV (2010) Biobased nanocomposites from layer-by-layer assembly of cellulose nanowhiskers with chitosan. Biomacromolecules 11(2):473–480 Dogan N, McHugh TH (2007) Effects of microcrystalline cellulose on functional properties of hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose microcomposite films. J Food Sci 72(1):E016–E022 Dong XM, Revol JF, Gray DG (1998) Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5:19–32 Eichhorn SJ (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 7(2):303 Favier V, Chanzy H, Cavaille JY (1996) Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers. Macromolecules 28:6365–6367 Ferrer A, Filpponen I, Rodríguez A, Laine J, Rojas OJ (2012) Valorization of residual Empty Palm Fruit Bunch Fibers (EPFBF) by microfluidization: production of nanofibrillated cellulose and EPFBF nanopaper. Bioresour Technol 125:249–255 Habibi Y, Goffin A-L, Schiltz N, Duquesne E, Dubois P, Dufresne A (2008) Bionanocomposites based on poly(ε-caprolactone)-grafted cellulose nanocrystals by ring-opening polymerization. J Mater Chem 18(41):5002 Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110(6):3479–3500 Huq T, Salmieri S, Khan A, Khan RA, Le Tien C, Riedl B, Fraschinic C, Bouchard J, Uribe-Calderon J, Kamal MR, Lacroix M (2012) Nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) reinforced alginate based biodegradable nanocomposite film. Carbohydr Polym 90:1757–1763 Jafari SM, He Y, Bhandari B (2007) Optimization of nano-emulsions production by microfluidization. Eur Food Res Technol 225:733–741 Jo Y-J, Kwon Y-J (2013) Characterization of β-carotene nanoemulsions prepared by microfluidization technique. Food Sci Biotechnol 23(1):1–7 Kanagaraj S, Varanda FR, Zhil’tsova TV, Oliveira MSA, Simões JAO (2007) Mechanical properties of high density polyethylene/carbon nanotube composites. Compos Sci Technol 67(15–16):3071–3077 Kasaai MR, Charlet G, Paquin P, Arul J (2003) Fragmentation of chitosan by microfluidization process. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 4(4):403–413 Khan A, Khan RA, Salmieri S, Le Tien C, Riedl B, Bouchard J, Chauve G, Victor T, Kamal MR, Lacroix M (2012) Mechanical and barrier properties of nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced chitosan based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 90(4):1601–1608 Khan A, Huq T, Khan Ra, Riedl B, Lacroix M (2014) Nanocellulose-based composites and bioactive agents for food packaging. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 54(2):163–174 Kumar MNVR, Muzzarelli RAA, Muzzarelli C, Sashiwa H, Domb AJ (2004) Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem Rev 104(12):6017–6084 Kvien I, Tanem BS, Oksman K (2005) Characterization of cellulose whiskers and their nanocomposites by atomic force and electron microscopy. Biomacromolecules 6(6):3160–3165 Laneuville SI, Turgeon SL, Paquin P (2013) Changes in the physical properties of xanthan gum induced by a dynamic high-pressure treatment. Carbohydr Polym 92(2):2327–2336 Lee S-Y, Chun S-J, Kang I-A, Park J-Y (2009) Preparation of cellulose nanofibrils by high-pressure homogenizer and cellulose-based composite films. J Ind Eng Chem 15(1):50–55 Miao C, Hamad WY (2013) Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: a critical review. Cellulose 20(5):2221–2262 Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994 Pereda M, Dufresne A, Aranguren MI, Marcovich NE (2014) Polyelectrolyte films based on chitosan/olive oil and reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 101:1018–1026 Prashanth KVH, Tharanathan RN (2007) Chitin/chitosan: modifications and their unlimited application potential and overview. Trends Food Sci Technol 18:117–131 Rhim J-W (2011) Effect of clay contents on mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of agar-based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 86(2):691–699 Tsai ML, Tseng LZ, Chen RH (2009) Two-stage microfluidization combined with ultrafiltration treatment for chitosan mass production and molecular weight manipulation. Carbohydr Polym 77(4):767–772 Wu Q, Henriksson M, Liu X, Berglund LA (2007) A high strength nanocomposite based on microcrystalline cellulose and polyurethane. Biomacromolecules 8(12):3687–3692 Zimmermann T, Pöhler E, Geiger T (2004) Cellulose fibrils for polymer reinforcement. Adv Eng Mater 6(9):754–761