Optimal resource allocation model for excessive flower production in a pollinating seed-predator mutualism
Tóm tắt
Many plants produce excessive flowers and several hypotheses have been proposed for adaptive significances of this behavior. Here, I develop a simple resource allocation model for plants in a mutualism with pollinating seed-predators to examine a novel hypothesis that excessive flower production can be favored to “dilute” seed predation by the pollinators. Pollinators visit flowers to deposit pollen and oviposit on them, and their offspring feed on a portion of the seeds, leaving the remainder intact. Further pollinator visits increase seed mortality by over-oviposition. Excessive flower production is favored if it decreases pollinator-visit frequency per flower, while it incurs decrease in seed production because of the resource trade-off. I examine three plant strategies: (1) no abortion, the plant allocates resource to all pollinated flowers to mature; (2) selective abortion, the plant aborts flowers depending on how many times they were visited by pollinators; and (3) random abortion, the plant indiscriminately aborts a fraction of pollinated flowers irrespective of how many times they were visited. I show that the random abortion strategy can perform much more effectively than the no-abortion strategy when the amount of resource is small, the production cost per flower is low, and the pollinator density is high, although the selective abortion strategy is always the best. This “predator dilution” effect has not been considered with regard to previous excessive flower production hypotheses.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Addicott JF, Bao T (1999) Limiting the costs of mutualism: multiple modes of interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:197–202
Bull JJ, Rice WR (1991) Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of co-operation. J Theor Biol 149:63–74
Burkhardt A, Delph LF, Bernasconi G (2009) Benefits and costs to pollinating, seed-eating insects: the effect of flower size and fruit abortion on larval performance. Oecologia 161:87–98
Dufaÿ M, Anstett MC (2003) Conflicts between plants and pollinators that reproduce within inflorescences: evolutionary variations on a theme. Oikos 100:3–14
Ghazoul J, Satake A (2009) Nonviable seed set enhances plant fitness: the sacrificial sibling hypothesis. Ecology 90:369–377
Holland JN, DeAngelis DL (2001) Population dynamics and the ecological stability of obligate pollination mutualisms. Oecologia 126:575–586
Holland JN, DeAngelis DL (2002) Ecological and evolutionary conditions for fruit abortion to regulate pollinating seed-eaters and increase plant reproduction. Theor Popul Biol 61:251–263
Holland JN, DeAngelis DL (2006) Interspecific population regulation and the stability of mutualism: fruit abortion and density-dependent mortality of pollinating seed-eating insects. Oikos 113:563–571
Holland JN, Bronstein JL, DeAngelis DL (2004a) Testing hypotheses for excess flower production and low fruit-to-flower ratios in a pollinating seed-consuming mutualism. Oikos 105:633–640
Holland JN, DeAngelis DL, Schultz ST (2004b) Evolutionary stability of mutualism: interspecific population regulation as an evolutionarily stable strategy. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:1807–1814
Huth CJ, Pellmyr O (2000) Pollen-mediated selective abortion in yuccas and its consequences for the plant–pollinator mutualism. Ecology 81:1100–1107
Janzen DH (1971) Seed predation by animals. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2:465–492
Janzen DH (1978) Seedling patterns of tropical trees. In: Tomlinson PB, Zimmermann MH (eds) Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 83–128
Janzen DH (1979) How to be a fig. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 10:13–51
Kelly D (1994) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol Evol 9:465–470
Kiers ET, Denison RF (2008) Sanctions, cooperation, and the stability of plant–rhizosphere mutualisms. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:215–236
Kiers ET, Rousseau RA, West SA, Denison RF (2003) Host sanctions and the legume–rhizobium mutualism. Nature 425:78–81
Pellmyr O, Huth CJ (1994) Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372:257–260
Sakai S (2007) A new hypothesis for the evolution of overproduction of ovules: an advantage of selective abortion for females not associated with variation in genetic quality of the resulting seeds. Evolution 61:984–993
Shapiro J, Addicott JF (2004) Re-evaluating the role of selective abscission in moth/yucca mutualisms. Oikos 105:449–460
Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506
Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 12:253–279
Traveset A (1993) Deceptive fruits reduce seed predation by insects in Pistacia terebinthus L. (Anacardiaceae). Evol Ecol 7:357–361
Udovic D, Aker C (1981) Fruit abortion and the regulation of fruit number in Yucca whipplei. Oecologia 49:245–248
Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR, Nitao JK (1991) Parthenocarpic fruits in wild parsnip: decoy defense against a specialist herbivore. Evol Ecol 5:136–145