Optimal investment and production decisions and the value of the firm
Tóm tắt
We explore the effects of uncertainty on a firm that can respond by modifying its investment or production schedule (or both simultaneously) to variations in output price. Investment may increase capacity and/or reduce costs. We consider a firm with finite resources. Our model uses option theory instead of the more traditional net present value framework. One of the early papers using this approach is Brennan and Schwartz (1985) in which an investment project to extract a finite natural resource is valued. In that paper, the value of the firm is a function of two state variables, the finite resource to be extracted (output to be produced in the future) and the commodity spot price. In order to maximize firm value, the manager can respond by modifying one control variable, the production level. In our model we handle instead three state variables (spot price, resources, accumulated investment) and two control variables (production rate and investment rate), and solve numerically. We obtain both the value and the optimal policy of a firm that has investment projects that increase capacity and/or reduce costs and illustrate optimal policies as resources and available investments decrease over the life of the firm. Firms may start by only investing, then invest and produce, to end only producing.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brennan, M. J., and E. S. Schwartz. (1985). “Evaluating Natural Resource Investments,”Journal of Business 58(2), 135–157.
Cortázar, G. (1992). “Essays in Contingent Claims.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Cortázar, G., and E. S. Schwartz. (1993). “A Compound Option Model of Production and Intermediate Inventories,”Journal of Business 66(4), 517–540.
Cortázar, G., E. S. Schwartz, and M. Salinas. (1997). “Evaluating Environmental Investments: A Real Options Approach,”Management Science, forthcoming.
Dixit, A. (1989). “Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty,”Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 620–638.
Dixit, A., and R. S. Pindyck. (1994).Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
Ekern, S. (1985). “An Option Pricing Approach to Evaluating Petroleum Projects,”Energy Economics 10, 91–99.
Geske, R., and K. Shastri. (1985). “Valuation by Approximation: A Comparison of Alternative Option Valuation Techniques,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20(1), 45–71.
He, H., and R. S. Pindyck. (1992). “Investment in Flexible Production Capacity,”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16, 575–599.
Majd, S., and R. S. Pindyck. (1987). “Time to Build, Option Value and Investment Decisions,”Journal of Financial Economics 18, 7–27.
Majd, S., and R. S. Pindyck. (1989). “The Learning Curve and Optimal Decision Under Uncertainty,”Rand Journal of Economics 20(3), 331–343.
McDonald, R., and D. Siegel. (1986). “The Value of Waiting to Invest,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 707–727.
Pindyck, R. S. (1988). “Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm,”American Economic Review 78(5), 969–985.
Paddock, J. L., D. W. Siegel, and J. L. Smith. (1988). “Option Valuation of Claims on Real Assets: The Case of Offshore Petroleum Leases,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, 479–508.
Pindyck, R. S. (1993). “Investments of Uncertain Cost,”Journal of Financial Economics 34(1), 53–73.
Schwartz, E. S. (1997). “The Stochastic Behavior of Commodity Prices: Implications for Valuation and Hedging,”Journal of Finance 52(3), 923–973.
Schwartz, E. S., and M. Moon. (1997). “Evaluating Research and Development Investments.” In M. J. Brennan and L. Trigeorgis (eds.),Innovation, Infrastructure and Strategic Options. Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
Trigeorgis, L. (1993). “Real Options and Interactions with Financial Flexibility,”Financial Management 22(3), 202–224.