Optimal grip on affordances in architectural design practices: an ethnography

Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(599), 1–14.

Charbonneau, M. (2013). The cognitive life of mechanical molecular models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 585–594.

Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195.

Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Clark, A. (2005). Beyond the flesh: some lessons from a mole cricket. Artificial Life, 11(1–2), 233–244.

Clark, A., & Toribio, P. (1994). Doing without representing. Synthese, 101(3), 401–431.

Colombetti, G. (2005). Appraising valence. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12, 103–126.

De Haan, S., Rietveld, E., Stokhof, M., & Denys, D. (2013). The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: an enactive affordance-based model. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(653), 1–14.

Di Paolo, E.A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In J. Steward, O. Gapenne & E.A. Di Paolo(Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. MIT Press, pp. 33–87.

Dotov, D. G. (2014). Putting reins on the brain. How the body and environment use it. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(795), 1–12.

Dotov, D.G., & Chemero, A. (forthcoming). Breaking the perception-action cycle: Experimental phenomenology of non-sense and its implications for theories of perception and movement science. In M. Cappuccio, & T. Froese (Eds.), Enactive cognition at the edge of sense making: Making sense of non-sense. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.

Dreyfus, H. L. (2002a). Intelligence without representation iMerleau-Ponty (critique of mental representation: the relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 367–383.

Dreyfus, H. L. (2002b). Refocusing the question: can there be skillful coping without propositional representations or brain representations? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 413–425.

Dreyfus, H. L., & Kelly, S. D. (2007). Heterophenomenology: heavy-handed sleight-of-hand. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 45–55.

Freeman, W. J. (2000). How brains make up their minds. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Frijda, N. H. (2007). The laws of emotion. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Friston, K. J. (2011). Embodied inference. In W. Tschacher & C. Bergomi (Eds.), The implications of embodiment (Cognition and Communication) (pp. 89–125). Exeter: Imprint Academic.

Gallagher, S., & Ransom, T. (forthcoming). Artifacting minds: Material engagement theory and joint action. In C. Tewes (ed.), Embodiment in evolution and culture. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Geeves, A., McIlwain, D., Sutton, J., & Christensen, W. (2010). Expanding expertise: investigating a musician’s experience of music performance. In W. Christensen, E. Schier, & J. Sutton (Eds.), ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian society for cognitive science (pp. 106–113). Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Lifflin.

Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the Legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. New York: Routledge.

Kelso, J. S. (2012). Multistability and metastability: understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 367(1591), 906–918.

Kirchhoff, M. D. (2015). Experiential fantasies, prediction, and enactive minds. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(3–4), 68–92.

Kirsh, D. (1991). Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3), 161–184.

Kiverstein, J., & Miller, M. (2015). The embodied brain: an argument for radical embodied cognition from neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(237), 1–11.

Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2015). The primacy of skilled intentionality: on Hutto & Satne’s the natural origins of content. Philosophia, 43(3), 701–721.

Malafouris, L. (forthcoming). Creative thinging: the feeling of and for clay. Pragmatics & Cognition.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/2002). Phenomenology of perception, trans. C. Smith. Routledge.

Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

Murphy, K. M. (2004). Imagination as joint activity: the case of architectural interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(4), 267–278.

Murphy, K. M. (2005). Collaborative imagining: the interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica, 156(1), 113–145.

Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Harvard University Press.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(09), 1435–1448.

Pallasmaa, J. (2009). The thinking hand: Existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. Chichester: Wiley.

Rietveld, E. (2008a). Situated normativity: the normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective action. Mind, 117(468), 973–1001.

Rietveld, E. (2008b). The skillful body as a concernful system of possible actions: phenomena and neurodynamics. Theory & Psychology, 18(3), 341–363.

Rietveld, E. (2012). Bodily intentionality and social affordances in context. In F. Paglieri (Ed.), Consciousness in interaction. The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness (pp. 207–226). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.

Rietveld, E. (2013). Skilled intentionality for ‘higher’ cognition. unpublished lecture at conference. The reach of REC, Antwerp, June 18th 2013.

Rietveld, E. (2016). Situating the embodied mind in landscape of standing affordances for living without chairs: materializing a philosophical worldview. The Journal of Sports Medicine. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0520-2 .

Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352.

Rietveld, E., De Haan, S., & Denys, D. (2013). Social affordances in context: what is it that we are bodily responsive to? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 436.

Rietveld, R., Rietveld, E., Zoeteman, M., & Mackic, A. (eds.) (2014). Vacancy studies: Experiments & strategic interventions in architecture. Rotterdam: nai010 Publishers.

Rietveld, E., Rietveld, R., Mackic, A., Van Waalwijk van Doorn, E., & Bervoets, B. (2015). The end of sitting: towards a landscape of standing affordances. Harvard Design Magazine, 40, 180–181.

Rietveld, E., Denys, D., & Van Westen, M. (forthcoming). The skilled intentionality framework for embodied/enactive cognitive science. In Newman et al. (Eds.), Oxford handbook for embodied cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second person neuroscience. BBS, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Slaby, J. (2008). Affective intentionality and the feeling body. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 429–442.

Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, habit and memory: the embodied mind and the nature of skill. Sport in Society, 10(5), 762–786.

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007). Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(1), 1–15.

Van Dijk, L., & Withagen, R. G. (2014). The horizontal worldview: a Wittgensteinian attitude towards scientific psychology. Theory & Psychology, 24(1), 3–18.

Withagen, R., De Poel, H., Araujo, D., & Pepping, G.-J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 250–258.