Operator-bias-free Comparison of Quantitative Perfusion Maps Acquired with Pulsed-continuous Arterial Spin Labeling and Single-photon-emission Computed Tomography

1. Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:212–216.

2. Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992; 23:37–45.

3. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed 1997; 10:237–249.

4. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:2359–2362.

5. Wang J, Alsop DC, Li L, et al. Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48:242–254.

6. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. A theoretical and experimental comparison of continuous and pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques for quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40:348–355.

7. Ye FQ, Smith AM, Yang Y, et al. Quantitation of regional cerebral blood flow increases during motor activation: a steady-state arterial spin tagging study. Neuroimage 1997; 6:104–112.

8. Alsop DC, Detre JA. Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16:1236–1249.

9. Mildner T, Möller HE, Driesel W, Norris DG, Trampel R. Continuous arterial spin labeling at the human common carotid artery: the influence of transit times. NMR Biomed 2005; 18:19–23.

10. Wu WC, Fernández-Seara M, Detre JA, Wehrli FW, Wang J. A theoretical and experimental investigation of the tagging efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58:1020–1027.

11. Dai W, Garcia D, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC. Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60:1488–1497.

12. Xu G, Rowley HA, Wu G, et al. Reliability and precision of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI on 3.0T and comparison with (15)O-water PET in elderly subjects at risk for Alzheimer's disease. NMR Biomed 2010; 23:286–293.

13. Järnum H, Steffensen EG, Knutsson L, et al. Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 2010; 52:307–317.

14. Iida H, Itoh H, Nakazawa M, et al. Quantitative mapping of regional cerebral blood flow using iodine-123-IMP and SPECT. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:2019–2030.

15. Iida H, Akutsu T, Endo K, et al. A multicenter validation of regional cerebral blood flow quantitation using [123I]iodoamphetamine and single photon emission computed tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16:781–793.

16. Kimura H, Kado H, Koshimoto Y, Tsuchida T, Yonekura Y, Itoh H. Multislice continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI in patients with chronic occlusive cerebrovascular disease: a correlative study with CO2 PET validation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22:189–198.

17. Arbab AS, Aoki S, Toyama K, et al. Brain perfusion measured by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with nuclear medicine technique. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:635–641.

18. Arbab AS, Aoki S, Toyama K, et al. Optimal inversion time for acquiring flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery images to quantify regional cerebral blood flow. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2950–2956.

19. Roberts DA, Detre JA, Bolinger L, Insko EK, Leigh JS Jr. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain perfusion at 1.5T using steady-state inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:33–37.

20. Ye FQ, Pekar JJ, Jezzard P, Duyn J, Frank JA, McLaughlin AC. Perfusion imaging of the human brain at 1.5T using a single-shot EPI spin tagging approach. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:217–224.

21. Ye FQ, Mattay VS, Jezzard P, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. Correction for vascular artifacts in cerebral blood flow values measured by using arterial spin tagging techniques. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37:226–235.

22. Iida H, Itoh H, Bloomfield PM, et al. A method to quantitate cerebral blood flow using a rotating gamma camera and iodine-123 iodoamphetamine with one blood sampling. Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21:1072–1084.

23. Takeuchi R, Yonekura Y, Takeda SK, Fujita K, Konishi J. Fully automated quantification of regional cerebral blood flow with three-dimensional stereotaxic region of interest template: validation using magnetic resonance imaging—technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2003; 43:153–162.

24. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, et al. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44:450–456.

25. Siewert B, Schlaug G, Edelman RR, Warach S. Comparison of EPISTAR and T₂*-weighted gadolinium-enhanced perfusion imaging in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Neurology 1997; 48:673–679.

26. Detre JA, Alsop DC, Vives LR, Maccotta L, Teener JW, Raps EC. Noninvasive MRI evaluation of cerebral blood flow in cerebrovascular disease. Neurology 1998; 50:633–641.

27. Chalela JA, Alsop DC, Gonzalez-Atavales JB, Maldjian JA, Kasner SE, Detre JA. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000; 31:680–687.

28. Lim CC, Petersen ET, Ng I, Hwang PY, Hui F, Golay X. MR regional perfusion imaging: visualizing functional collateral circulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28:447–448.

29. Altrichter S, Kulcsar Z, Jägersberg M, et al. Arterial spin labeling shows cortical collateral flow in the endovascular treatment of vasospasm after post-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neuroradiol 2009; 36:158–161.

30. Viallon M, Altrichter S, Pereira VM, et al. Combined use of pulsed arterial spin-labeling and susceptibility-weighted imaging in stroke at 3T. Eur Neurol 2010; 64:286–296.

31. Wang DJ, Alger JR, Qiao JX, et al. The value of arterial spin-labeled perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke: comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. Stroke 2012; 43:1018–1024.

32. Marchal G, Young AR, Baron JC. Early postischemic hyperperfusion: pathophysiologic insights from positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999; 19:467–482.

33. Marchal G, Furlan M, Beaudouin V, et al. Early spontaneous hyperperfusion after stroke. A marker of favourable tissue outcome? Brain 1996; 119:409–419.

34. Tanaka Y, Nagaoka T, Nair G, Ohno K, Duong TQ. Arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast CBF MRI in postischemic hyperperfusion, hypercapnia, and after mannitol injection. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011; 31:1403–1411.

35. Nagasawa N, Yamakado K, Yamada T, et al. Three-dimensional stereotactic ROI template for measuring regional cerebral blood flow in 99mTc-ECD SPECT: comparison with the manual tracing method. Nucl Med Commun 2009; 30:155–159.