Operation management of green ports and shipping networks: overview and research opportunities
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acomi N, Acomi O (2014). The influence of different types of fuel over the energy efficiency operational index. Energy Procedia, 59: 243–248
Adland R, Fonnes G, Jia H, Lampe O D, Strandenes S P (2017). The impact of regional environmental regulations on empirical vessel speeds. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 53: 37–49
Agarwal R, Ergun O (2008). Ship scheduling and network design for cargo routing in liner shipping. Transportation Science, 422: 175–196
Agarwal R, Ergun O (2010). Network design and allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances in liner shipping. Operations Research, 586: 1726–1742
Álvarez J F (2009). Joint routing and deployment of a fleet of container vessels. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 112: 186–208
Ančić I, Šestan A (2015). Influence of the required EEDI reduction factor on the CO2 emission from bulk carriers. Energy Policy, 84: 107–116
Ballini F, Bozzo R (2015). Air pollution from ships in ports: the socioeconomic benefit of cold-ironing technology. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 17: 92–98
Bish E K, Chen F Y, Leong Y T, Nelson B L, Ng J W C, Simchi-levi D (2005). Dispatching vehicles in a mega container terminal. OR-Spektrum, 274: 491–506
Bouman E A, Lindstad E, Rialland A I, Strømman A H (2017). State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping—a review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52: 408–421
Brouer B D, Alvarez J F, Plum C E M, Pisinger D, Sigurd M M (2014). A base integer programming model and benchmark suite for liner-shipping network design. Transportation Science, 482: 281–312
Buhaug Ø, Corbett J, Endresen Ø, Eyring V, Faber J, Hanayama S, Lee D, Lindstad H, Markowska A, Mjelde A (2009). Second IMO GHG Study. London: International Maritime Organization (IMO)
Chen K, Xu P, Yang Z (2017). Optimization model of liner transportation system considering cargo owner’s choice inertia. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 207: 104–114 (in Chinese)
Chen L, Yip T L, Mou J (2018). Provision of emission control area and the impact on shipping route choice and ship emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 58: 280–291
Chen Y, Leong Y T, Ng J W C, Demir E K, Nelson B L, Simchi-Levi D (1998). Dispatching automated guided vehicles in a mega container terminal. In: Proceedings of INFORMS Meeting, Montreal, Canada
Cheng H, Li B (2012). A comparative study of EEDI criterion methods. Shipbuilding of China, 53: 103–109 (in Chinese)
Cordeau J F, Laporte G, Legato P, Moccia L (2005). Models and tabu search heuristics for the berth allocation problem. Transportation Science, 394: 526–538
Davarzani H, Fahimnia B, Bell M, Sarkis J (2016). Greening ports and maritime logistics: a review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48: 473–487
Doudnikoff M, Lacoste R (2014). Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in sulphur emission control areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28: 51–61
Du Y, Chen Q, Lam J S L, Xu Y, Cao J X (2015). Modeling the impacts of tides and the virtual arrival policy in berth allocation. Transportation Science, 494: 939–956
Du Y, Chen Q, Quan X, Long L, Fung R Y K (2011). Berth allocation considering fuel consumption and vessel emissions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 476: 1021–1037
Fagerholt K, Gausel N T, Rakke J G, Psaraftis H N (2015). Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 52: 57–73
Fagerholt K, Psaraftis H N (2015). On two speed optimization problems for ships that sail in and out of emission control areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 39: 56–64
Fransoo J C, Lee C Y (2013). The critical role of ocean container transport in global supply chain performance. Production and Operations Management, 222: 253–268
Giallombardo G, Moccia L, Salani M, Vacca I (2010). Modeling and solving the tactical berth allocation problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 442: 232–245
Gu Y, Wallace S W (2017). Scrubber: a potentially overestimated compliance method for the emission control areas: the importance of involving a ship’s sailing pattern in the evaluation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 55: 51–66
Hall W J (2010). Assessment of CO2 and priority pollutant reduction by installation of shoreside power. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 547: 462–467
He J (2016). Berth allocation and quay crane assignment in a container terminal for the trade-off between time-saving and energy-saving. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 303: 390–405
He J, Huang Y, Yan W (2015a). Yard crane scheduling in a container terminal for the trade-off between efficiency and energy consumption. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(1): 59–75
He J, Huang Y, Yan W, Wang S (2015b). Integrated internal truck, yard crane and quay crane scheduling in a container terminal considering energy consumption. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5): 2464–2487
Heitmann N, Khalilian S (2011). Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping: Burden sharing under different UNFCCC allocation options and regime scenarios. Marine Policy, 355: 682–691
Hou J (2017). Dynamic berth allocation problem with two types of shore power for containership based on rolling horizon strategy. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), Singapore, 144–149
Hu Q M, Hu Z H, Du Y (2014). Berth and quay-crane allocation problem considering fuel consumption and emissions from vessels. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 70: 1–10
Hu Z (2015). Multi-objective genetic algorithm for berth allocation problem considering daytime preference. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 89: 2–14
Imai S, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2001). The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 354: 401–417
IMO (2008). Revised MARPOL Annex VI: Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships and NOx technical code. London: IMO Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC)
Jia P, Govindan K, Kannan D (2015). Identification and evaluation of influential criteria for the selection of an environmental shipping carrier using DEMATEL: a case from India. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 76: 719–741
Jin Z, Li N, Han J (2014). Fleet deployment optimization of container liner routes under the unbalance of supply and demand. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 351: 21–28 (in Chinese)
Kavakeb S, Nguyen T T, McGinley K, Yang Z, Jenkinson I, Murray R (2015). Green vehicle technology to enhance the performance of a European port: a simulation model with a cost-benefit approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 60: 169–188
Kozan E, Preston P (2006). Mathematical modeling of container transfers and storage locations at seaport terminals. OR-Spektrum, 284: 519–537
Lee C Y, Song D P (2017). Ocean container transport in global supply chains: overview and research opportunities. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 95: 442–474
Lee L H, Chew E P, Tan K C, Wang Y (2010). Vehicle dispatching algorithm for container transshipment hubs. OR-Spektrum, 323: 663–685
Lee T, Chang Y, Lee P (2013). Economy-wide impact analysis of a carbon tax on international container shipping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 58: 87–102
Li B (2012). The status of energy saving and emission reduction and the methods of low carbon development in shipping industry. Journal of Engineering Studies, 4: 260–269 (in Chinese)
Li H, Zhang H, Wu G (2015). Analysis of EEDI influencing factors of ships and measures. China Water Transport, 15: 68–69 (in Chinese)
Lindstad H, Asbjornslett B E, Stromman A H (2011). Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds. Energy Policy, 39(6): 3456–3464
Liu D, Ge Y E (2018). Modeling assignment of quay cranes using queueing theory for minimizing CO2 emission at a container terminal. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61: 140–151
Lu R, Turan O, Boulougouris E, Banks C, Incecik A (2015). A semiempirical ship operational performance prediction model for voyage optimization towards energy efficient shipping. Ocean Engineering, 110: 18–28
Lv J, Mao H (2017). An optimization model of liner ship fleet deployment under sulfur emission control area and carbon emission restriction. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 431: 101–105 (in Chinese)
Meng Q, Wang S, Andersson H, Thun K (2014). Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping: overview and future research directions. Transportation Science, 482: 265–280
Murty K G, Liu J, Wan Y, Linn R (2005). A decision support system for operations in a container terminal. Decision Support Systems, 393: 309–332
Norstad I, Fagerholt K, Laporte G (2011). Tramp ship routing and scheduling with speed optimization. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 195: 853–865
Panagakos G P, Stamatopoulou E V, Psaraftis H N (2014). The possible designation of the Mediterranean Sea as a SECA: a case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28: 74–90
Peng Y, Wang W, Song X, Zhang Q (2016). Optimal allocation of resources for yard crane network management to minimize carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131: 649–658
Pjevčević D, Vladisavljević I, Vukadinović K, Teodorović D (2011). Application of DEA to the analysis of AGV fleet operations in a port container terminal. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20: 816–825
Psaraftis H N, Kontovas C A (2013). Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: a taxonomy and survey. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 26: 331–351
Psaraftis H N, Kontovas C A (2014). Ship speed optimization: concept, models and combined speed-routing scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 44: 52–69
Rizaldi A, Wasesa M, Rahman M N (2015). Yard cranes coordination schemes for automated container terminals: an agent-based approach. Procedia Manufacturing, 4: 124–132
Sha M, Zhang T, Lan Y, Zhou X, Qin T, Yu D, Chen K (2017). Scheduling optimization of yard cranes with minimal energy consumption at container terminals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113: 704–713
Shi Y (2016). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping: is it time to consider market-based measures. Marine Policy, 64: 123–134
Sun X, Yan X, Wu B, Song X (2013). Analysis of the operational energy efficiency for inland river ships. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 22: 34–39
Talavera A M, Barron J G G, Passamani C M T C (2016). Optimization of vessel and quay crane emissions during the hoteling phase. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), Chalkidiki, Greece: IEEE, 1–10
UNCTAD (2011). Review of Maritime Transport 2011. United Nations, New York and Geneva
UNCTAD (2015). Review of Maritime Transport 2015. United Nations, New York and Geneva
Vaishnav P, Fischbeck P S, Morgan M G, Corbett J J (2016). Shore power for vessels calling at US ports: benefits and costs. Environmental Science & Technology, 503: 1102–1110
Venturini G, Iris C, Kontovas C A, Larsen A (2017). Multi-port berth allocation problem with speed optimization and emission considerations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 54: 142–159
Wang F, Huang J, Liu Z (2017). Port management and operations: emerging research hotspots and development. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 205: 111–126 (in Chinese)
Wang F, Lim A (2007). A stochastic beam search for the berth allocation problem. Decision Support Systems, 424: 2186–2196
Wang H, Mao X, Rutherford D (2015a). Costs and Benefits of Shore Power at the Port of Shenzhen. The International Council on Clean Transportation
Wang K, Fu X, Luo M (2015b). Modeling the impacts of alternative emission trading schemes on international shipping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77: 35–49
Wang S, Meng Q (2012a). Liner ship fleet deployment with container transshipment operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(2): 470–484
Wang S, Meng Q (2012b). Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(3): 701–714
Wang S, Meng Q, Liu Z (2013). A note on “berth allocation considering fuel consumption and vessel emissions”. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 491: 48–54
Wang T, Lu L, Wang X (2016). Cooperation mode of port and shipping companies with the introduction of price compensation mechanism. Resource Development & Market, 32: 1409–1414 (in Chinese)
Wang T, Wang X, Meng Q (2018). Joint berth allocation and quay crane assignment under different carbon taxation policies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 117: 18–36
Winkel R, Weddige U, Johnsen D, Hoen V, Papaefthimiou S (2016). Shore side electricity in Europe: potential and environmental benefits. Energy Policy, 88: 584–593
Xia J, Li X, Ma H, Xu Z (2015). Joint planning of fleet deployment, speed optimization, and cargo allocation for liner shipping. Transportation Science, 494: 922–938
Yu H, Ge Y E, Chen J, Luo L, Tan C, Liu D (2017a). CO2 emission evaluation of yard tractors during loading at container terminals. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 53: 17–36
Yu S, Wang C (2015). Ship speed optimization under different carbon emission control policies. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 41 (3): 45–50 (in Chinese)
Yu S, Wang S, Zhen L (2017b). Quay crane scheduling problem with considering tidal impact and fuel consumption. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 29(3–4): 345–368
Zhang S, Zhang S (2008). Trading mechanism framework for international maritime greenhouse gas emissions. China Maritime Safety, 9: 60–63 (in Chinese)
Zhao Y (2015). Axle-spoke container shipping network design problem under competitive environment. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 237: 103–112 (in Chinese)
Zhao Y, Duan H, Kuang H (2015). Axle-spoke container shipping network design considering CO2 emissions. Journal of Systems Engineering, 30: 383–393 (in Chinese)
Zhen L (2017). Optimization of Container Port Operation Management. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
Zheng J, Gao Z, Yang D, Sun Z (2015). Network design and capacity exchange for liner alliances with fixed and variable container demands. Transportation Science, 494: 886–899
Zhu M, Zhen H, Gan A (2016). Optimization of liner fleet deployment under carbon emission right trading. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 161: 202–208