Opening the black box: Finding the source of cost inefficiency

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 27 - Trang 209-220 - 2007
Santiago Carbó Valverde1, David B. Humphrey2, Rafael López del Paso1
1Departamento de Teoría e Historia Económica, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
2Department of Finance, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA

Tóm tắt

Parametric and nonparametric procedures are used to identify the apparent source of cost inefficiency in banking. Inefficiencies of 20–25% from earlier studies are reduced to 1–5% when, in addition to commonly specified cost function influences, variables reflecting banks’ external business environment and industry indicators of “productivity” are added. These productivity indicators explain most of the reduction in bank operating cost over 1992–2001 and was 5 times the reduction in the dispersion of inefficiency. Inefficiency appears stable over time because it is small relative to industry-wide cost changes occurring concurrently and because technology dispersion is imperfect.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bauer P, Berger A, Ferrier G, Humphrey D (1998) Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: a comparison of frontier efficiency methods. J Econ Bus 50:85–114 Bauer P, Hancock D (1993) The efficiency of the federal reserve in providing check processing services. J Bank Finance 17:287–311 Berger A (1993) Distribution-free estimates of efficiency in the U.S. banking industry and tests of the standard distributional assumptions. J Product Anal 4:261–292 Berger A, Humphrey D (1991) The dominance of inefficiencies over scale and product mix economies in banking. J Monet Econ 28:117–148 Berger A, Humphrey D (1997) Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. Eur J Operat Res 98:175–212 Berger A, Mester L (1997) Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions. J Bank Finance 21:895–947 Carbó-Valverde S, Humphrey D, López del Paso R (2006) Electronic payments and ATMs: Changing technology and cost efficiency in banking. In: Balling M, Lierman L, Mullineaux A (eds) Competition and Profitability in European Financial Services. Strategic, Systemic and Policy Issues, Routledge, Abingdon (UK), pp 96–113 Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Operat Res 2:429–444 DeYoung R (1997) A diagnostic test for the distribution-free efficiency estimator: An example using U.S. commercial bank data. Eur J Operat Res 98:243–249 Dietsch M, Lozano-Vivas A (2000) How the environment determines banking efficiency: a comparison between French and Spanish industries. J Bank Finance 24:985–1004 Frei F, Harker P, Hunter L (2000) Inside the black box: what makes a bank efficient? In: Harker P, Zenios S (eds) Performance of financial institutions: efficiency, innovation, regulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Humphrey D, Willesson M, Bergendahl G, Lindblom T (2006) Benefits from a changing payment technology in European banking. J Bank Finance 30:1631–1652 Lozano-Vivas A, Humphrey D (2002) Bias in Malmquist index and cost function productivity measurement in banking. Int J Product Econ 76:177–188 Lozano-Vivas A, Pastor J, Pastor J (2002) An efficiency comparison of european banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. J Product Anal 18:59–78 Maudos J, Pastor J, Pérez F, Quesada J (2002) Cost and Profit Efficiency in the European Banks. J Int Financial Markets, Inst Money 12:33–58 Rhoades S (1993) The efficiency effects of horizontal bank mergers. J Bank Finance 17:411–422 Sherman D, Ladino G (1995) Managing bank productivity using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Interfaces 25:60–73 Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econom 136:31–46 Tulkens H (1993) On FDH efficiency analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit. J Product Anal 4:183–221