On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity

Arrow, 1993, Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation, Federal Register, 58, 4601 I.J. Bateman, P. Cooper, S. Georgiou, G.L. Poe, Visible choice sets and scope sensitivity: an experimental and field test of study design effects upon nested contingent values, CSERGE Global Environmental Change Working Paper EDM 01-01, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, 2001b. Bateman, 1995, Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies, Ecol. Econom., 12, 161, 10.1016/0921-8009(94)00044-V I.J. Bateman, I.H. Langford, A.P. Jones, G.N. Kerr, Bound and path effects in multiple-bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Resource Energy Econom. 23(3) (2001a) 191–213. I.J. Bateman, A. Munro, B. Rhodes, C. Starmer, R. Sugden, Does part-whole bias exist? An experimental investigation, Econom. J. 107(441) (1997a) 322–332. I.J. Bateman, A. Munro, B. Rhodes, C. Starmer, R. Sugden, A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences, Quart. J. Econom. 112(2) (1997b) 479–505. Beattie, 1998, On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation, J. Risk Uncertainty, 17, 5, 10.1023/A:1007711416843 Bishop, 1992, Existence values in benefit-cost analysis and damage assessments, Land Econom., 68, 405, 10.2307/3146697 Boyle, 1994, An investigation of part–whole biases in contingent valuation studies, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 27, 64, 10.1006/jeem.1994.1026 K.J. Boyle, M.P. Welsh, R.C. Bishop, The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies, J. Environ. Econom. Manage. 25 (1993) S-80–S-99. Brown, 1995, Does better information about the good avoid the embedding effect?, J. Environ. Manage., 44, 1, 10.1006/jema.1995.0026 R.T. Carson, Contingent valuation surveys and tests of insensitivity to scope, in: R.J. Kopp, W.W. Pommerehne, N. Schwarz (Eds.), Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1997. Carson, 1998, Sequencing and valuing public goods, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 36, 314, 10.1006/jeem.1998.1050 Carson, 2001, Contingent valuation, Environ. Resource Econom., 19, 173, 10.1023/A:1011128332243 R.T. Carson, T. Groves, M.J. Machina, Incentive and information properties of preference questions, Unpublished Draft Manuscript, University of California, San Diego, February 2000. Carson, 1993, The issue of scope in contingent valuation surveys, Amer. J. Agri. Econom., 75, 1263, 10.2307/1243469 Carson, 1995, Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 28, 155, 10.1006/jeem.1995.1011 R.T. Carson, R.C. Mitchell, Public preferences toward environmental risks: the case of trihalomethanes, in: A. Alberini, D. Bjornstad, J. Kahn (Eds.), Handbook of Contingent Valuation, Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT, forthcoming. Cubitt, 2001, On money pumps, Games Econom. Behav., 37, 121, 10.1006/game.2000.0834 P.A. Diamond, J.A. Hausman, G.K. Leonard, M.A. Denning, Does contingent valuation measure preferences? Experimental evidence, in: J.A. Hausman (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993. Environment Agency, West Midlands-tame local environment agency plan consultation report, Environment Agency, Lichfield, 1998. Ferraro, 2003, Detecting other-regarding behavior with virtual players, J. Econom. Behav. Organ., 51, 99, 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00137-3 S. Georgiou, I.J. Bateman, M. Cole, D. Hadley, Contingent ranking and valuation of river water quality improvements: testing for scope sensitivity, ordering and distance decay effects, CSERGE Global Environmental Change Working Paper GEC2000-18, CSERGE, UEA, 2000. Giraud, 1999, Internal and external scope in willingness-to-pay estimates for threatened and endangered wildlife, J. Environ. Manage., 56, 221, 10.1006/jema.1999.0277 Hammitt, 1999, Willingness to pay for health protection, J. Risk Uncertainty, 8, 33, 10.1023/A:1007760327375 W.M. Hanemann, Neo-classical economic theory and contingent valuation, in: I.J. Bateman, K.G. Willis (Eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999, pp. 42–96. Harrison, 1992, Valuing public goods with the contingent valuation method, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 23, 248, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90003-F J.P. Hoehn, The benefits–costs evaluation of multi-part public policy: a theoretical framework and critique of estimation methods, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1983. Hoehn, 1982 D. Kahneman, Comments, in: R.C. Cummings, D.S. Brookshire, W.D. Schulze (Eds.), Valuing Environmental Goods, Totawa, NJ, Roman and Allenheld, 1986. Kahneman, 1992, Valuing public goods, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 22, 57, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S Knetsch, 1984, Willingness to pay and compensation demanded, Quart. J. Econom., 99, 507, 10.2307/1885962 Loomis, 1993, Some empirical evidence on embedding effects in contingent valuation of forest protection, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 25, 45, 10.1006/jeem.1993.1025 Mitchell, 1989 Payne, 2000, Valuation of multiple environmental programs, J. Risk Uncertainty, 21, 95, 10.1023/A:1026573527618 N.A. Powe, Using contingent valuation to value nested goods: a case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, 1999. A. Randall, J.P. Hoehn, G.S. Tolley, The structure of contingent markets: some empirical results, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, Washington, DC, 1981. Rollins, 1998, The case for diminishing marginal existence values, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 36, 324, 10.1006/jeem.1998.1045 Samuelson, 1988, Status quo bias in decision making, J. Risk Uncertainty, 1, 7, 10.1007/BF00055564 Schkade, 1994, How people respond to contingent valuation questions, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 26, 88, 10.1006/jeem.1994.1006 Schulze, 1998, Embedding and calibration in measuring non-use values, Resource Energy Econom., 20, 163, 10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00034-1 Smith, 1992, Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 22, 71, 10.1016/0095-0696(92)90020-W Smith, 1986 Smith, 1987, An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk changes, J. Polit. Econom., 95, 89, 10.1086/261443 Smith, 1996, Do contingent valuation estimates pass a scope test? A meta-analysis, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 31, 287, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0045 Smith, 1999, Marine debris beach quality, and non-market values, Environ. Resource Econom., 10, 223, 10.1023/A:1026465413899 R. Sugden, Public goods and contingent valuation, in: I.J. Bateman, K.G. Willis (Eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991, pp. 131–151. Thaler, 1980, Toward a positive theory of consumer choice, J. Econom. Behav. Organization, 1, 39, 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 G.S. Tolley, A. Randall, G. Blomquist, R. Fabian, G. Fishelson, A. Frankel, J. Hoehn, R. Krumm, E. Mensah, Establishing and valuing the effects of improved visibility in the Eastern United States, Interim Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1983. Tversky, 1991, Loss aversion in riskless choice, Quart. J. Econom., 106, 1039, 10.2307/2937956 Wonnacott, 1984