On the making of crystal balls: Five lessons about simulation modeling and the organization of work

Information and Organization - Tập 31 - Trang 100339 - 2021
Paul M. Leonardi1, DaJung Woo2, William C. Barley3
1Technology Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
2Department of Communication, Rutgers University, USA
3Department of Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barley, 2015, Anticipatory work: How the need to represent knowledge across boundaries shapes work practices within them, Organization Science, 26, 1612, 10.1287/orsc.2015.1012 Barley, 2012, Engineering objects for collaboration: Strategies of ambiguity and clarity at knowledge boundaries, Human Communication Research, 38, 280, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01430.x Bechky, 2003, Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor, Organization Science, 14, 312, 10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162 Beunza, 2019 Beunza, 2019, Performative work: Bridging performativity and institutional theory in the responsible investment field, Organization Studies, 40, 515, 10.1177/0170840617747917 Boland, 2007, Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction, Organization Science, 18, 631, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0304 1998 Carlile, 2004, Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries, Organization Science, 15, 555, 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094 Collins, 2002, The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience, Social Studies of Science, 32, 235, 10.1177/0306312702032002003 Daston, 2007 Day, 2014, Number ecologies: numbers and numbering practices, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15, 123, 10.1080/1600910X.2014.923011 Dodgson, 2007, “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering, Organization Science, 18, 849, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0287 Dougherty, 2012, Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation, Organization Science, 23, 1467, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0700 Edwards, 2010 Enserink, 2020, With COVID-19, modeling takes on life and death importance, Science, 367, 1414, 10.1126/science.367.6485.1414-b Fine, 2007 Garud, 2019, Performativity: Not a destination but an ongoing journey, Academy of Management Review, 44, 679, 10.5465/amr.2018.0315 Jonsson, 2018, Representation and mediation in digitalized work: Evidence from maintenance of mining machinery, Journal of Information Technology, 33, 216, 10.1057/s41265-017-0050-x Knorr-Cetina, 1999 Leonardi, 2012 Leonardi, 2013, When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances, MIS Quarterly, 749, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.04 Leonardi, 2017, Recognizing and selling good ideas: Network articulation and the making of an offshore innovation hub, Academy of Management Discoveries, 3, 116, 10.5465/amd.2015.0151 Leonardi, 2019, The coevolution of objects and boundaries over time: Materiality, affordances, and boundary salience, Information Systems Research, 30, 665, 10.1287/isre.2018.0822 Levina, 2008, Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration, MIS Quarterly, 307, 10.2307/25148842 Lobo, 2017, Aligning and reconciling: Building project capabilities for digital delivery, Research Policy, 46, 93, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.005 MacKenzie, 2006 Mackenzie, 2018, Counterperformativity, New Left Review, 113, 97 Mazmanian, 2018, “Making” your numbers: Engendering organizational control through a ritual of quantification, Organization Science, 29, 357, 10.1287/orsc.2017.1185 Poisot, 2020, COVID-19 models demand an abundance of caution, American Scientist Silver, 2012, The signal and the noise: why so many predictions fail--but some don't, Penguin Tetlock, 2005 Tetlock, 2015 Tversky, 1974, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 1124, 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 Woo, 2018, Breaking into collaboration: Communicative strategies for gaining entry when you are not invited, Journal of Communication, 1127, 10.1093/joc/jqy052 Woo, 2019, Reconceptualizing interorganizational collaborations as tensile structures: Implications of conveners’ proactive tension management, Communication Monographs, 86, 158, 10.1080/03637751.2018.1526389 Woo, 2019, Exit strategies in interorganizational collaboration: Setting the stage for re-entry, Communication Research, 0093650219851418