On the dynamic effects of explicit FEM in sheet metal forming analysis

Engineering Computations - Tập 15 Số 6 - Trang 750-776 - 1998
W.J.Chung1, J.W.Cho1, T.Belytschko2
1Department of Supercom Applications, Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Suwon, South Korea
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois USA

Tóm tắt

This study is concerned with dynamic effects when we use explicit FEM for sheet metal forming analysis. Since sheet metal forming is a quasi‐static process, time scaling and mass scaling techniques have been widely used in order to save computation time. However, to define suitable scale factor still requires several trials. In this study, an internal energy error estimate which indicates accumulated incremental errors due to dynamic effects is suggested. This estimate is applied to each subdomain to consider the locality of deformation. Draw bending problem is analyzed to show the effectiveness of the suggested method. An analytic solution is derived for simplified draw bending to compare with the computed results. The cause of stress error in this problem is investigated and the method to reduce the stress error is suggested. Finally, the suggested method is applied to S‐rail benchmark test.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1.Belytschko, T., “An overview of semidiscretization and time integration procedures”, in Belytschko, T. and Hughes, T.J.R. (Eds), Computational Methods for Transient Analysis, North‐Holland, 1983, pp. 1‐65.

2.Hughes, T.J.R., “Analysis of transient algorithms with particular reference to stability behaviour”, in Belytschko, T. and Hughes, T.J.R. (Eds), Computational Methods for Transient Analysis, North‐Holland, 1983, pp. 67‐155.

3.Hallquist, J.O., Goudreau, G.L. and Benson, D.J., “Sliding interfaces with contact‐impact in large‐scale, Lagrangian computations”, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg, Vol. 51, 1985, pp. 107‐37.

4.Rebelo, N., Nagtegaal, J.C., Taylor, L.M. and Passman, R., “Comparison of implicit and explicit methods in the simulation of metal forming processes”, Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, Numiform′92, Conference Proceedings, September 14‐18 1992, Valbonne, France, 1992, p. 99‐108.

5.Prior, A.M., “Applications of implicit and explicit finite element techniques to metal forming”, J. of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 45, 1994, pp. 649‐56.

6.Belytschko,T., Ong, J.‐S., Liu, W.K. and Kennedy, J.M., “Hourglass control in linear and nonlinear problems”, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., Vol. 43, 1983, pp. 251‐76.

7.Belytschko, T., Lin, J.I. and Tsay, C.S., “Explicit algorithms for one point quadrature shell element”, Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg, Vol. 42, 1984, pp. 225‐51.

8.Schweizerhof, K., Weimar, K., Hallquist, J.O. and Stillman, D., “Improving standard shell elements, friction models, and contact algorithms for the efficient solution of sheet metal forming problems with LS‐DYNA3D”, Proceedings of FE‐Simulation of 3‐D sheet Metal Forming Processes in Automotive Industry, Zurich (Switzerland) VDI‐verlag, 1991, pp. 499‐515.

9.Mattiasson, K.et al., “On the use of explicit time integration in finite element simulation of industrial sheet forming processes”, FE‐simulation of 3‐D Sheet Metal Forming Processes in Automotive Industry, VDI berichte 894, Conference Proceedings, May 14‐16, Zurich, 1991, pp. 479‐97.

10.Galbraith, P.C.et al., “Evaluation of an LS‐DYNA3D model for deep drawing of aluminum sheet”, Proceedings of FE‐Simulation of 3‐D sheet Metal Forming Processes in Automotive Industry, Zurich (Switzerland) VDI‐verlag, 1991, pp. 441‐66.

11.Aberlence, F. and Babeau, J.L., “OPTRIS and FICTURE: Industrial tools to modelize sheet metal forming”, Numerical Methods in Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Numiform’92, Conference Proceedings, September 14‐18 1992, Valbonne, France, 1992, pp. 397‐402.

12.Makinouchi, M., Nakamachi, E., Onate, E. and Wagoner, R.H. (Eds), NUMISHEET’93‐Second International Conference on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes ‐ verification of simulation with experiment, Tokyo (Japan) 1993.

13.Huo, T. and Nakamachi, E., “Evaluation of dynamic explicit/elasto viscoplastic finite element Method in Sheet Forming Simulation”, Proceeding of The 2nd International Conference‐NUMISHEET′93, Tokyo (Japan), 1993, pp. 173‐86.

14.Mattiasson, K.“Simulation of springback in sheet metal forming”, in Balkema, A.A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes‐NUMIFORM′95, 1995, pp. 115‐24.

15.“S‐rail benchmark test”, Benchmark test of NUMISHEET′96, Dearbon Michigan, September 29‐October 3, 1996.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Engineering Computations

Tập 15 Số 6

750-776

Thông tin tác giả