On the category adjustment model: another look at Huttenlocher, Hedges, and Vevea (2000)

Sean Duffy1, John Smith2
1Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, USA
2Department of Economics, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allred S, Crawford LE, Duffy S, Smith J (2016) Working memory and spatial judgments: cognitive load increases the central tendency bias. Psychon Bull Rev 23(6):1825–1831

Ashourian P, Loewenstein Y (2011) Bayesian inference underlies the contraction bias in delayed comparison tasks. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19551

Bae GY, Olkkonen M, Allred SR, Flombaum JI (2015) Why some colors appear more memorable than others: a model combining categories and particulars in color working memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 144(4):744–763

Barth H, Lesser E, Taggart J, Slusser E (2015) Spatial estimation: a non-Bayesian alternative. Dev Sci 18(5):853–862

Blackwell D, Dubins L (1962) Merging of opinions with increasing information. Ann Math Stat 33:882–886

Bowers JS, Davis CJ (2012a) Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychol Bull 138(3):389–414

Bowers JS, Davis CJ (2012b) Is that what Bayesians believe? Reply to Griffiths, Chater, Norris, and Pouget (2012). Psychol Bull 138(3):423–426

Cassey P, Hawkins GE, Donkin C, Brown SD (2016) Using alien coins to test whether simple inference is Bayesian. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 42(3):497–503

Chater N, Tenenbaum JB, Yuille A (2006) Probabilistic models of cognition: conceptual foundations. Trends Cognit Sci 10(7):287–291

Chater N, Goodman N, Griffiths TL, Kemp C, Oaksford M, Tenenbaum JB (2011) The imaginary fundamentalists: the unshocking truth about Bayesian cognitive science. Behav Brain Sci 34(4):194–196

Choplin JM, Hummel JE (2002) Magnitude comparisons distort mental representations of magnitude. J Exp Psychol Gen 131(2):270–286

Corbin JC, Crawford LE, Vavra DT (2017) Misremembering emotion: inductive category effects for complex emotional stimuli. Mem Cognit 45(5):691–698

Corneille O, Huart J, Becquart E, Brédart S (2004) When memory shifts toward more typical category exemplars: accentuation effects in the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces. J Personal Soc Psychol 86(2):236–250

Crawford LE (2019) Reply to Duffy and Smith’s (2018) reexamination. Psychon Bull Rev 26(2):693–698

Crawford LE, Duffy S (2010) Sequence effects in estimating spatial location. Psychon Bull Rev 17(5):725–730

Crawford LE, Huttenlocher J, Engebretson PH (2000) Category effects on estimates of stimuli: perception or reconstruction? Psychol Sci 11(4):280–284

Crosetto P, Filippin A, Katuščák P, Smith J (2020) Central tendency bias in belief elicitation. J Econ Psychol 78:102273

DeCarlo LT, Cross DV (1990) Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: models and theory. J Exp Psychol Gen 119(4):375–396

Duffy S, Smith J (2018) Category effects on stimulus estimation: shifting and skewed frequency distributions—a reexamination. Psychon Bull Rev 25(5):1740–1750

Duffy S, Smith J (2020) Omitted-variable bias and other matters in the defense of the category adjustment model: a reply to Crawford. J Behav Exp Econ 85:101501

Duffy S, Huttenlocher J, Hedges LV, Crawford LE (2010) Category effects on stimulus estimation: shifting and skewed frequency distributions. Psychon Bull Rev 17:224–230

Edwards W, Lindman H, Savage LJ (1963) Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychol Rev 70(3):193–242

Elqayam S, Evans JSB (2011) Subtracting “ought” from “is”: descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. Behav Brain Sci 34(5):233–248

Eriksson K (2012) The nonsense math effect. Judgm Decis Mak 7(6):746–749

Estes WK (1956) The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychol Bull 53(2):134–140

Feldman NH, Griffiths TL, Morgan JL (2009) The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychol Rev 116(4):752–782

Fugate JM (2013) Categorical perception for emotional faces. Emot Rev 5(1):84–89

Goodman ND, Frank MC, Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB, Battaglia PW, Hamrick JB (2015) Relevant and robust: a response to Marcus and Davis (2013). Psychol Sci 26(4):539–541

Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB (2006) Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychol Sci 17(9):767–773

Griffiths TL, Chater N, Norris D, Pouget A (2012) How the Bayesians got their beliefs (and what those beliefs actually are): comment on Bowers and Davis (2012). Psychol Bull 138(3):415–422

Hahn U (2014) The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad? Front Psychol 5:765

Hayes KJ (1953) The backward curve: a method for the study of learning. Psychol Rev 60(4):269–275

Hemmer P, Steyvers M (2009a) Integrating episodic memories and prior knowledge at multiple levels of abstraction. Psychon Bull Rev 16(1):80–87

Hemmer P, Steyvers M (2009b) A Bayesian account of reconstructive memory. Top Cognit Sci 1:189–202

Hemmer P, Tauber S, Steyvers M (2015) Moving beyond qualitative evaluations of Bayesian models of cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 22(3):614–628

Hertwig R, Pachur T, Kurzenhäuser S (2005) Judgments of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 31(4):621–642

Holden MP, Curby KM, Newcombe NS, Shipley TF (2010) A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 36(3):590–604

Hollingworth HL (1910) The central tendency of judgment. J Philos Psychol Sci Methods 7(17):461–469

Hund AM, Spencer JP (2003) Developmental changes in the relative weighting of geometric and experience-dependent location cues. J Cognit Dev 4(1):3–38

Huttenlocher J, Hedges LV, Vevea JL (2000) Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? J Exp Psychol Gen 129:220–241

Jesteadt W, Luce RD, Green DM (1977) Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3(1):92–104

Jones M, Love BC (2011a) Bayesian fundamentalism or enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition. Behav Brain Sci 34(4):169–188

Jones M, Love BC (2011b) Pinning down the theoretical commitments of Bayesian cognitive models. Behav Brain Sci 34(4):215–231

Jones M, Curran T, Mozer MC, Wilder MH (2013) Sequential effects in response time reveal learning mechanisms and event representations. Psychol Rev 120(3):628–666

Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds) Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 49–81

Kahneman D, Tversky A (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychol Rev 80(4):237–251

Laming D (1984) The relativity of ‘absolute’ judgements. Br J Math Stat Psychol 37(2):152–183

Lewandowsky S, Griffiths TL, Kalish ML (2009) The wisdom of individuals: exploring people’s knowledge about everyday events using iterated learning. Cognit Sci 33(6):969–998

Marcus GF, Davis E (2013) How robust are probabilistic models of higher-level cognition? Psychol Sci 24(12):2351–2360

Marcus GF, Davis E (2015) Still searching for principles: a response to Goodman et al. (2015). Psychol Sci 26(4):542–544

McCullough S, Emmorey K (2009) Categorical perception of affective and linguistic facial expressions. Cognition 110(2):208–221

Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psychol Rev 115(2):502–517

Mozer MC, Pashler H, Homaei H (2008) Optimal predictions in everyday cognition: the wisdom of individuals or crowds? Cognit Sci 32(7):1133–1147

Norris D, McQueen JM (2008) Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychol Rev 115(2):357–395

Olkkonen M, Allred SR (2014) Short-term memory affects color perception in context. PLoS ONE 9(1):e86488

Olkkonen M, McCarthy PF, Allred SR (2014) The central tendency bias in color perception: effects of internal and external noise. J Vis 14(11):1–15

Perfors A, Tenenbaum JB, Griffiths TL, Xu F (2011) A tutorial introduction to Bayesian models of cognitive development. Cognition 120(3):302–321

Persaud K, Hemmer P (2014) The influence of knowledge and expectations for color on episodic memory. Proc Cognit Sci Soc 36:1162–1167

Petzold P (1981) Distance effects on sequential dependencies in categorical judgments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7(6):1371–1385

Petzold P, Haubensak G (2004) The influence of category membership of stimuli on sequential effects in magnitude judgment. Percept Psychophys 66(4):665–678

Petzschner FH, Glasauer S, Stephan KE (2015) A Bayesian perspective on magnitude estimation. Trends Cognit Sci 19(5):285–293

Poulton EC (1979) Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychol Bull 86(4):777–803

Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2012) E-Prime 2.0. http://www.pstnet.com. Accessed Oct 2015

Rahnev D, Denison RN (2018) Suboptimality in perceptual decision making. Behav Brain Sci 41:1–66

Roberson D, Damjanovic L, Pilling M (2007) Categorical perception of facial expressions: evidence for a “category adjustment” model. Mem Cognit 35(7):1814–1829

Sailor KM, Antoine M (2005) Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian? Mem Cognit 33:840–851

Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW (2004) Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows”. Soc Psychol Q 67(4):319–342

Savage LJ (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York. Reprinted in 1972 by Dover, New York

Schutte AR, Spencer JP (2009) Tests of the dynamic field theory and the spatial precision hypothesis: capturing a qualitative developmental transition in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35(6):1698–1725

Sidman M (1952) A note on functional relations obtained from group data. Psychol Bull 49(3):263–269

Siegler RS (1987) The perils of averaging data over strategies: an example from children’s addition. J Exp Psychol Gen 116(3):250–264

Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci 22(11):1359–1366

Spencer JP, Hund AM (2002) Prototypes and particulars: geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. J Exp Psychol Gen 131(1):16–37

Spencer JP, Hund AM (2003) Developmental continuity in the processes that underlie spatial recall. Cognit Psychol 47(4):432–480

Sperber D (2010) The guru effect. Rev Philos Psychol 1(4):583–592

Staddon JE, King M, Lockhead GR (1980) On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 6(2):290–301

Steegen S, Tuerlinckx F, Gelman A, Vanpaemel W (2016) Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci 11(5):702–712

Stevens SS, Greenbaum HB (1966) Regression effect in psychophysical judgment. Percept Psychophys 1(5):439–446

Stewart N, Brown GD, Chater N (2002) Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 28(1):3–11

Tauber S, Navarro DJ, Perfors A, Steyvers M (2017) Bayesian models of cognition revisited: setting optimality aside and letting data drive psychological theory. Psychol Rev 124(4):410–441

Tenenbaum JB, Griffiths TL, Kemp C (2006) Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends Cognit Sci 10(7):309–318

Twedt E, Crawford LE, Proffitt DR (2015) Judgments of others’ heights are biased toward the height of the perceiver. Psychon Bull Rev 22(2):566–571

Vines TH, Albert AY, Andrew RL, Débarre F, Bock DG, Franklin MT, Gilbert KJ, Moore JS, Renaut S, Rennison DJ (2014) The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Curr Biol 24(1):94–97

Wagenmakers EJ, Wetzels R, Borsboom D, Maas HLJ (2011) Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi. J Personal Soc Psychol 100(3):426–432

Wicherts JM, Veldkamp CL, Augusteijn HE, Bakker M, van Aert RC, Van Assen MA (2016) Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: a checklist to avoid p-hacking. Front Psychol 7:1832

Wilder M, Jones M, Mozer MC (2009) Sequential effects reflect parallel learning of multiple environmental regularities. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 22:2053–2061

Woods AT, Poliakoff E, Lloyd DM, Dijksterhuis GB, Thomas A (2010) Flavor expectation: the effect of assuming homogeneity on drink perception. Chemosens Percept 3(3–4):174–181

Young SG, Hugenberg K, Bernstein MJ, Sacco DF (2009) Interracial contexts debilitate same-race face recognition. J Exp Soc Psychol 45(5):1123–1126

Yu AJ, Cohen JD (2009) Sequential effects: superstition or rational behavior? Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 21:1873–1880