On the appropriate use of QCA in environmental management research: A comment on Hossu et al.

Baumgartner, M., and A. Thiem. 2017. Often trusted but never (properly) tested: Evaluating qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research (Online ahead of print). Dressler, Wolfram H., D. Wilson, J. Clendenning, R. Cramb, R. Keenan, S. Mahanty, T.B. Bruun, O. Mertz, and Rodel D. Lasco. 2017. The impact of swidden decline on livelihoods and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia: A review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015. Ambio 46: 291–310. Hossu, C.A., I.C. Ioja, L.E. Susskind, D.L. Badiu, and A.M. Hersperger. 2018. Factors driving collaboration in natural resource conflict management: Evidence from Romania. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1016-0. Ide, T. 2018. Does environmental peacemaking between states work? Insights on cooperative environmental agreements and reconciliation in international rivalries. Journal of Peace Research 55: 351–365. Marx, A., and A. Dusa. 2011. Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification. Methodological Innovations Online 6 (2): 103–148. Schneider, Carsten Q., and C. Wagemann. 2012. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thiem, A. 2013. Clearly crisp, and not fuzzy: a reassessment of the (putative) pitfalls of multi-value QCA. Field Methods 25 (2): 197–207.