On the Use of the Beta Distribution in Probabilistic Resource Assessments
Tóm tắt
The triangular distribution is a popular choice when it comes to modeling bounded continuous random variables. Its wide acceptance derives mostly from its simple analytic properties and the ease with which modelers can specify its three parameters through the extremes and the mode. On the negative side, hardly any real process follows a triangular distribution, which from the outset puts at a disadvantage any model employing triangular distributions. At a time when numerical techniques such as the Monte Carlo method are displacing analytic approaches in stochastic resource assessments, easy specification remains the most attractive characteristic of the triangular distribution. The beta distribution is another continuous distribution defined within a finite interval offering wider flexibility in style of variation, thus allowing consideration of models in which the random variables closely follow the observed or expected styles of variation. Despite its more complex definition, generation of values following a beta distribution is as straightforward as generating values following a triangular distribution, leaving the selection of parameters as the main impediment to practically considering beta distributions. This contribution intends to promote the acceptance of the beta distribution by explaining its properties and offering several suggestions to facilitate the specification of its two shape parameters. In general, given the same distributional parameters, use of the beta distributions in stochastic modeling may yield significantly different results, yet better estimates, than the triangular distribution.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bowman, K. O., & Shenton, L. R. (2007). Type beta distribution, moment method, Karl Pearson and R. A. Fisher. Far East Journal of Theoretical Statistics, 23(2), 133–164.
Capen, E. C. (2010). The difficulty of assessing uncertainty. SPE Economics and Management, 2(1), 4–11. Also available as http://www.spe.org/ejournals/spe/EEM/2010/04/SPEEM_Apr10_SecondLook.pdf. Accessed in February 2011.
Charpentier, R. R., & Klett, T. R. (2000). Monte Carlo simulation method. In U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-60, disk 1, chapter MC.
Curtis, J., Kumar, N., Ray, P., Riese, R., & Ritter, J. (2001). Resource assessment methodology used by the USGS. American Association of Petroleum Geologists. http://www.aapg.org/committees/resource_evaluation/gas_assess_method.cfm. Accessed in March 2011.
Dale, A. I. (1999). A history of inverse probability: from Thomas Bayes to Karl Pearson. New York: Springer Verlag Inc.
Forbes, C., Evans, M., Hastings, N., & Peacock, B. (2011). Statistical distributions (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Willey.
Gupta, A. K., & Nadarajah, S. (2004). Mathematical properties of the beta distribution. In A. K. Gupta & S. Nadarajah (Eds.), Handbook of beta distribution and its applications. CRC Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=cVmnsxa-VzwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22beta+distribution%22&source=bl&ots=JoCmj32Emb&sig=i4onTbw4tWQ8L4cU_BDNH1eNU3o&hl=en&ei=qRcKTZ7kFIK78gbbjb2fAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CFEQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed in January 2011.
Herrerías-Pleguezuelo, R., García-Pérez, J., & Cruz-Rambaud, S. (2003). A note on the reasonableness of PERT hypotheses. Operations Research Letters, 31(1), 60–62.
Hudak, D. G. (1994). Adjusting triangular distributions for judgmental bias. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 1025–1031.
Krishnamoorthy, K. (2006). Handbook of statistical distributions with applications. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Meyer, M. A., & Booker, J. M. (2001). Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment: A practical guide. Philadelphia, PA: Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).
Nadarajah, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2004). Beta function and the incomplete beta function. In A. K. Gupta & S. Nadarajah (Eds.), Handbook of beta distribution and its applications. CRC Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=cVmnsxa-VzwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22beta+distribution%22&source=bl&ots=JoCmj32Emb&sig=i4onTbw4tWQ8L4cU_BDNH1eNU3o&hl=en&ei=qRcKTZ7kFIK78gbbjb2fAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CFEQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed in January 2011.
Vose, D. (2008). Quantitative risk analysis: A quantitative guide (3rd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.