On the Road to Justice: Some Selected Suggestions for the Future of Social Justice Research

Social Justice Research - Tập 36 - Trang 352-370 - 2023
Herman Steensma1
1Department of Social, Economic, and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

In this paper, several aspects of social justice research are reviewed to analyze the current state of the field and to suggest refinements and new directions. The micro–macro-levels problem is discussed, including the policy of affirmative action. A canon of relevant philosophers is proposed. The strong influence of justice principles on social change research, search conferences and group interventions are demonstrated. The information value of social justice theories can be strengthened in several ways. Expanded information value implies increased effectiveness of advice and interventions. Possibilities to integrate justice criteria in total quality management are discussed. Contemporary quality management focuses on triple-P criteria: people, planet, profit, highly relevant for basic and applied justice research. The current state of the social justice discipline is rather good, but there is room for improvement. Finally, interdisciplinary research is the future, in particular for studies to solve complex societal and global problems.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press. Aristotle (335 BC). Ethica Nicomachea. (1998). Nicomachean ethics (D.P. Chase, Transl.) Dover. Beccaria, C. (1764). Dei delitti e delle pene. (1986, transl.) On crimes and punishments. Hackett Publishing Co. Boudon, R. (1977). Effets pervers et ordre social. PUF. Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., & Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 173–202). Plenum. Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (1997). Large group interventions: Engaging the whole system for rapid change. Jossey-Bass. Bushe, G. R. (2013). The appreciative inquiry model. In Kessler, E. H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (pp. 41–44). Clayton, S., Kals, E., & Feygina, I. (2016). Justice and environmental sustainability. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 369–386). Springer. Coleman, J. S. (1986). Social theory, social research and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1309–1335. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative Inquiry in organizational life. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129–169). JAI Press. Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2001). A positive revolution in change. In D. L. Cooperrider, P. Sorenson, D. Whitney, & T. Yeager (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: An emerging direction for organizational development (pp. 9–29). Stipes. Elden, M., & Chisholm, R. F. (1993). Emerging varieties of action research: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 46(2), 121–142. Emery, M. (1993). Participative design for participative democracy. Centre for Continuing Education, Australian National University. Emery, M., & Purser, R. (1996). The search conference. Jossey-Bass. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield: Charles C Thomas. Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanism in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67. Holman, P., Devane, T., & Cady, S. (2008). The change handbook: The definitive resource on today’s best methods for engaging whole systems. Berrett-Koehler. Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual aid—A factor of evolution. McClure Phillips & Co. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer. Leyland, A. H., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2020). Health in context. In A. H. Leyland & P. P. Groenewegen (Eds.), Multilevel modelling for public health and health services research—Health in context (pp. 13–27). Springer. Liebig, S., & Sauer, C. (2016). Sociology of justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 37–59). Springer. Lindenberg, S. (1977). Individuelle Effekte, kollektive Phänomene und das Problem der Transformation. In K. Eichner & W. Habermehl (Eds.), Probleme der Erklärung sozialen Verhaltens (pp. 46–84). Hain. Liu, M. (1997). Fondements et pratiques de la recherche-action. L’Harmattan. Oakes, J. M. (2009). Commentary: Individual, ecological, and multilevel fallacies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 38(2), 361–368. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. Rockström, J., Gupta, J., Qin, D., et al. (2023). Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature, 619, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8 Sabbagh, C., & Schmitt, M. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of social justice theory and research. Springer. Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. In Raphael, D. D., & Macfie, A. L. (Eds.), (1976) Oxford University Press. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner, & W.B. Todd (eds.) (1976) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Steensma, H. (2014). Rechtvaardigheid: De kernfactor voor total quality management. Sigma, Platform Voor Kwaliteitsmanagement, 59(2), 30–36. Steensma, H., & van der Vlist, R. (1998). Action research to reduce sickness absenteeism. A case study. Concepts and Transformations, 3(3), 179–206. Törnblom, K. Y., & Kazemi, A. (2007). Toward a resource production theory of distributive justice. In K. Törnblom & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Distributive and procedural justice: Research and social applications (pp. 39–66). Ashgate. Toulmin, S., & Gustavsen, B. (1996). Beyond theory: Changing organizations through participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Vermunt, R., & Steensma, H. (2001). Stress and justice in organizations: An exploration into justice processes with the aim to find mechanisms to reduce stress. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace (Vol. 2, pp. 27–48). Erlbaum.