On the Notion of Organisational Integrity
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Robert Audi and Patrick E Murphy ‘The many faces of integrity’ Business Ethics Quarterly 16 no 1 (2006) pp 3–21
See, for example, Stewart R Clegg ‘Radical Revisions: Power, Discipline and Organizations’ Organization Studies 10 no 1 (1989) pp 97–115, where Clegg argues that Foucault’s perspective on the industrial society and disciplinary control are latently present in the work of Weber. J R Barker and G Cheney ‘The Concept and Practices of Discipline in Contemporary Organizational Life’ Communication Monographs 61 no 1 (1994) pp 19–43, where they assert that Foucault’s concept of discipline is a logical offspring of Weber’s perception of growing rationalization of society.
Audi and Murphy op. cit.
See for example the discussion of corporate citizenship in Business Ethics Quarterly 18 no 1.
Celia Wells ‘Corporate Responsibility’ in R Chadwick, D Callahan, P Singer (eds) Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics Vol I pp 653–661 Academic Press.
Whether or not an organisation can be regarded as having moral agency is an ongoing debate within the business ethics literature. But even proponents of the assertion that it can would not stick to the organisation-as-person metaphor in such a strict way. Their position is somewhat moderated into ‘person like characteristics’ and the position is pragmatically defended with regard to liabilities. For an overview of the debate and the numerous positions, see chapter three of Muel Kaptein and Johan Wempe The Balanced Company. A Theory of Corporate Integrity Oxford OUP 2002.
See for example: Ronald J Burke and Cary L Cooper (eds) The Organization in Crisis: Downsizing, Restructuring, and Privatization Oxford Blackwell 2000; Cary L Cooper and Ronald J Burke (eds) The New World of Work: Challenges and Opportunities Oxford Blackwell 2002; Duncan Gallie, Michael White, Yuan Cheng and Mark Tomlinson Restructuring the Employment Relationship Oxford OUP 1998; In the context of New Public Management, see for example Geert Van Hootegem De draaglijke traagheid van het management. Tendensen in het productie- en personeelsbeleid Leuven Acco 2000.
Robert C Solomon Business and Excellence Oxford, Oxford University Press 1993 pp 81–82.
Lynn Sharp Paine ‘Managing for organizational integrity’ Harvard Business Review 72 no 2 (1994) pp 106–117.
Robert H Meyers Self-governance and Cooperation p 73 Aldershot Ashgate 1999.
Thomas E Becker ‘Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness’ Academy of Management Review 23 no 1 (1998) pp 154–161.
Bruce Barry and Caroll U Stephens ‘Objections to an Objectivist Approach to Integrity’ Academy of Management Review 23 no 1 p 162 (1998) pp 162–169.
Edwin A Locke and Thomas E Becker ‘Rebuttal to a Subjectivist Critique of an Objectivist Approach to Integrity in Organizations’ Academy of Management Review 23 no 1 (1998) pp 170–175.
ibid.
Richard Double Metaethical Subjectivism Aldershot Ashgate 2006 p 4 (emphasis in orginal).
ibid. p 12.
Cora Diamond ‘Integrity’ in Lawrence C Becker and Charlotte B Becker Encyclopedia of Ethics New York Garland Publ 1992 pp 618–21 cited in Audi and Murphy 2006 op. cit.
Stephen L Carter Integrity New York, Harper Perennial 1997.
Wim Vandekerckhove ‘Integrity: Talking the Walk Instead of Walking the Talk’ in Chris Carter, Stewart Clegg, Martin Kornberger, Stephan Laske, Martin Messner (eds) Business Ethics as Practice Cheltenham and Northampton Edward Elgar 2007 pp 153–168.
Lynn McFall op. cit.
Thomas E Becker op. cit. Edwin A Locke and Thomas E Becker op. cit.
Ayn Rand The Fountainhead New York, New American Library 1943.
Marvin Brown Corporate Integrity Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2005.
See Wim Vandekerckhove Whistleblowing and Organizational Social Responsibility Aldershot, Ashgate 2006, and a discussion on unanticipated ‘dark side’ effects of establishing such organisational precondition in Eva E Tsahuridu and Wim Vandekerckhove ‘Whistleblowing and Moral Autonomy in Organisations’ Journal of Business Ethics 82 no 1 (2008) pp 107–118.