On the Norms of Visual Argument: A Case for Normative Non-revisionism

Adriaans, P. 2012. Information. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 edn), ed. E. Zalta, 1–56. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/information. Barceló-Aspeitia, A. 2012. Words and images in argumentation. Argumentation 26: 355–368. Barwise, J., and J. Etchemendy. 1996. Visual information and valid reasoning. In Logical reasoning with diagrams, ed. G. Allwein, and J. Barwise, 3–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Barwise, J., and E. Hammer. 1996. Diagrams and the concept of logical system. In Logical reasoning with diagrams, ed. G. Allwein, and J. Barwise, 49–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bateson, G. 1973. Steps to an ecology of mind. Frogmore, At. Albans: Paladin. Beal, G., E. Rogers, and J. Bohlen. 1957. Validity of the concept of stages in the adoption process. Rural Sociology 22: 166–168. Birdsell, D., and L. Groarke. 1996. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 33: 1–10. Birdsell, D., and L. Groarke. 2007. Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 43: 103–113. Blair, J.A. 1996. The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy 33: 23–39. Reprinted in J.A. Blair, Groundwork in the theory of argumentation, 205–223. Amsterdam: Springer (2012). Blair, J.A. 2004. The rhetoric of visual arguments. In Defining visual rhetorics, ed. C.A. Hill, and M. Helmers, 41–61. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Reprinted in J.A. Blair, Groundwork in the theory of argumentation, 261–279. Amsterdam: Springer (2012). Blair, J.A. 2015. Probative norms for multimodal visual arguments. Argumentation 29: 217–233. Bohlen, J. and G. Beal. 1957. The diffusion process. Special Report No. 18 (Agriculture Extension Service, Iowa State College) 1: 56–77. http://www.soc.iastate.edu/extension/pub/comm/SP18.pdf. Brandom, R. 2000. Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Brown, H. 1988. Rationality. London: Routledge. Brown, J. 1997. Proofs and pictures. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 161–181. Brown, J. 2008. Philosophy of mathematics: A contemporary introduction to the world of proofs and pictures, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. Dove, I. 2002. Can pictures prove? Logique et Analyse 179–180: 309–340. Dove, I. 2011. Visual analogies and arguments. In Argumentation: Cognition and community: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21, 2011, CD ROM, ed. F. Zenker et al., 1–16. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Dove, I. 2012. On images as evidence and arguments. In Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 223–238. Dordrecht: Springer. Dove, I. 2013. Visual arguments and meta-arguments. In Virtues of argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013, CD ROM, ed. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewiński, 1–15. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Dove, I. 2016. Visual scheming: Assessing visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy 52: 254–264. Engel, P. 2000. Introduction: The varieties of belief and acceptance. In Believing and accepting, ed. P. Engel, 1–30. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Fleming, D. 1996. Can pictures be arguments? Argumentation and Advocacy 33: 105–131. Floridi, L. 2003. Two approaches to the philosophy of information. Minds and Machines 13: 459–469. Floridi, L. 2005. Is semantic information meaningful data? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 351–370. Floridi, L. 2010. Information: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Floridi, L. 2011. The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gilbert, M. 1994. Multi-modal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24: 159–177. Gilbert, M. 1997. Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Godden, D. 2004. Arguing at cross-purposes: Discharging the dialectical obligations of the coalescent model of argumentation. Argumentation 17: 219–243. Godden, D. 2010. The importance of belief in argumentation: Belief, commitment and the effective resolution of a difference of opinion. Synthese 172: 397–414. Godden, D. 2013. On the norms of visual argument. In Virtues of argumentation. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013, CD ROM, ed. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewiński, 1–13. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Godden, D. 2014. Teaching rational entitlement and responsibility: A Socratic exercise. Informal Logic, Teaching Supplement 34: 124–151. Godden, D. 2015a. Argumentation, rationality, and psychology of reasoning. Informal Logic 35: 135–166. Godden, D. 2015b. Images as arguments: Progress and problems, a brief commentary. Argumentation 29: 235–238. Godden, D. 2015c. On the priority of agent-based argumentative norms. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy. doi: 10.1007/s11245-014-9296-x. Godden, D. 2016. Visual argument: Content, commensurability, and cogency. In Argumentation and reasoned action: Proceedings of the first European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 9-12 June 2015, vol. II, ed. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewiński. Govier, T. 2005. A practical study of argument, 6th ed. Toronto: Thompson-Wadsworth. Groarke, L. 1996. Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic 18: 105–129. Groarke, L. 2002. Toward a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In Advances in pragma-dialectics, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 137–151. Amsterdam: SicSat. Groarke, L. 2003. Commentary on R. Johnson’s “Why ‘visual arguments’ aren’t arguments.” In Informal logic at 25: Proceedings of the windsor conference, CD-ROM, ed. J.A. Blair et al., 1–4. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Groarke, L. 2007. Beyond words: Two dogmas of informal logic. In Reason reclaimed: Essays in honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph Johnson, ed. H.V. Hansen, and R.C. Pinto, 135–152. Newport News, VA: Vale Press. Groarke, L. 2009. Commentary on G. Roque’s “What is visual in visual argumentation?” In Argument cultures: Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), CD-ROM, ed. J. Ritola, 1-3. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Groarke, L. 2013. On Dove, visual evidence and verbal repackaging. In Virtues of argumentation. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013, ed. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewiński, 1–8. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Groarke, L. 2014. Visual argument, Wittgenstein and Patterson: How to do things without words. In International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), 8th International Conference on Argumentation, at the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, July 1–4, 2014. Groarke, L. 2015. Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation 29: 133–155. Groarke, L., and C. Tindale. 2012. Good reasoning matters!, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Groarke, L., C.H. Palczewski, and D. Godden. 2016. Navigating the visual turn in argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 52: 217–235. Guarini, M. 2011. Commentary on Ian Dove’s “Visual analogies and arguments.” In Argumentation: Cognition and community: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21, 2011, CD ROM, ed. F. Zenker et al., 1–5. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Hesse, D. 1992. Aristotle’s Poetics and Rhetoric: Narrative as rhetoric’s fourth mode. In Rebirth of rhetoric: Essays in language, culture, and education, ed. R. Andrews, 19–38. London: Routledge. Hammer, E., and N. Danner. 1996. Towards a model theory of Venn diagrams. In Logical reasoning with diagrams, ed. G. Allwein, and J. Barwise, 109–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johnson, R.H. 2003. Why “visual arguments” aren’t arguments. In Informal logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor conference, CD-ROM, ed. J.A. Blair et al., 1–13. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Johnson, R.H. 2010. On the evaluation of visual arguments: Roque and the autonomy thesis. [Unpublished conference paper, presented to] Persuasion et argumentation: Colloque international organisé par le CRAL à l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 105 Bd. Raspail, 75006 Paris, Salle 7, 7–9 Septembre 2010. Johnson, R., and J.A. Blair. 1994. Logical self-defense, 3rd ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill. Kitcher, P., and A. Varzi. 2000. Some pictures are worth 2ℵ0 sentences. Philosophy 75: 377–381. Kjeldsen, J. 2012. Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 239–255. Dordrecht: Springer. Kjeldsen, J. 2013. Virtues of visual argumentation. In Virtues of argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013, CD ROM, ed. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewiński, 1–13. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Kjeldsen, J. 2015a. The rhetoric of thick representation: How pictures render the importance and strength of an argument salient. Argumentation 29: 197–215. Kjeldsen, J. 2015b. The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation 29: 115–132. Kjeldsen, J. 2015c. Where is visual argument? In Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 107–117. Dordrecht: Springer. Lake, R., and B. Pickering. 1998. Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation 12: 79–93. Morgan, S. 2005. More than pictures? An exploration of visually dominant magazine ads as arguments. Journal of Visual Literacy 25: 145–166. Mumma, J. 2010. Proofs, pictures, and Euclid. Synthese 175: 255–287. O’Keefe, D.J. 1977. Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association 13: 121–128. Patterson, S. 2010. “A picture held us captive”: The later Wittgenstein on visual argumentation. Cogency 2: 105–134. Pinto, R.C. 2006. Evaluating inferences: The nature and role of warrants. Informal Logic 26: 287–317. Pinto, R.C. 2009. Argumentation and the force of reasons. Informal Logic 29: 268–295. Rogers, E. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe: Free Press. Roque, G. 2009. What is visual in visual argumentation? In Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), CD-ROM, ed. J. Ritola, 1–9. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Roque, G. 2012. Visual argumentation: A further reappraisal. In Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 273–288. Dordrecht: Springer. Roque, G. 2015. Should visual arguments be propositional in order to be arguments? Argumentation 29: 177–195. Siegel, H. 1988. Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking and education. New York: Routledge. Siegel, H. 1997. Rationality redeemed: Further dialogues on an educational ideal. New York: Routledge. Siegel, H. 2004. Rationality and judgment. Metaphilosophy 35: 597–613. Shin, S.-J. 1996. Situation-theoretic account of valid reasoning with Venn diagrams. In Logical reasoning with diagrams, ed. G. Allwein, and J. Barwise, 81–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tseronis, A. 2013. Argumentative functions of visuals: Beyond claiming and justifying. In Virtues of argumentation. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013, CD ROM, ed. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewiński, 1–17. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Van den Hoven, P. 2011. The story behind the plot: About the propositionality of visually presented argumentation. In Argumentation: Cognition and community: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21, 2011, CD ROM, ed. F. Zenker et al., 1–8. Windsor, ON: OSSA. Van den Hoven, P. 2015. Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation 29: 157–176. Walton, D., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Willard, C. 1989. A theory of argumentation. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.