On the Coherence of Wittgensteinian Constructivism

Acta Analytica - Tập 31 Số 4 - Trang 455-462 - 2016
Amit Saad1
1Shalvata Mental Health Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2009). Wittgenstein: rules, grammar and necessity—essays and exegesis of ##185-242 (Second, ex.). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Bernays, P. (1964). On platonism in mathematics, 1935. In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam (Eds.), C. D. Parsons (Trans.), Philosophy of Mathematics (pp. 274–286). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

Craig, E. (1982). Meaning, use, and privacy. Mind, XCI, 549–564.

Dummett, M. (1959). Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics. The philosophical review, 68(3), 324–348.

Dummett, M. (1975a). The philosophical basis of intuitionistic logic. Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, 80, 5–40.

Dummett, M. (1975b). Wang’s paradox. Synthese, 30, 301–324.

Heyting, A. (1966). Intuitionism: an introduction. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.

Magidor, O. (2007). Strict finitism refuted? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107(1.3), 1–9.

Magidor, O. (2011). Strict finitism and the happy sorites. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(2), 471–491.

Mawby, J. (2005). Strict finitism as a foundation for mathematics. University of Glasgow. Retrieved from http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1344/

Saad, A. (2014). Do you really mean it?—the Kripkenstein paradox and its solutions. Saarbrücken: Scholars’ Press.

Wittgenstein, L. (1964). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. (E. G. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Wright, C. (1982). Strict finitism. Synthese, 51, 203–282.