On the Amelioration of “Women”
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen, A. (1999). The Power of feminist theory: Domination, resistance, solidarity (Vol. 112). Boulder: Westview Press.
Ball, D. (2020). Could women be analytically oppressed? In A. Burgess, D. Plunkett, & H. Cappelen (Eds.), Conceptual ethics and conceptual engineering (pp. 35–58). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, K. (2009). Composition, colocation and metaontology. In D. J. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology (pp. 38–76). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bettcher, T. M. (2009). Trans identities and first-person authority. In L. Shrage (Ed.), Sex reassignment and personal identity (pp. 98–120). New York: Oxford University Press.
Blum, L. (2007). Three kinds of race-related solidarity. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38(1), 53–72.
Bogardus, T. (2020). Some internal problems with revisionary gender concepts. Philosophia, 48(1), 55–75.
Brownstein, M., & Saul, J. (Eds.). (2016). Implicit bias and philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chen, H.-Y. (forthcoming). Contextualism and the semantics of ‘Women’. Ergo
Dean, J. (1996). Solidarity of strangers: Feminism after identity politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dembroff, R. (2018) Real talk on the metaphysics of gender. Philosophical topics, 46(2) gendered oppression and its intersections, 21-50.
Diaz-Leon, E. (2016). Woman as a politically significant term: A solution to the puzzle. Hypatia, 31(2), 245–258.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haslanger, S. (2020). Going on, not in the same way. In A. Burgess, D. Plunkett, & H. Cappelen (Eds.), Conceptual ethics and conceptual engineering (pp. 230–260). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.
Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, K. (2016). Amelioration and inclusion: Gender identity and the concept of woman. Ethics, 126(2), 394–412.
Lugones, M. (2003). Pilgrimages = Peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
May, L. (1996). The socially responsive self : Social theory and professional ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mikkola, M. (2016). The wrong of injustice: The role of dehumanization in feminist philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Plunkett, D. (2015). Which concepts should we use? Metalinguistic negotiations and the methodology of philosophy. Inquiry, 58, 828–874.
Plunkett, D., & Sundell, T. (2013). Disagreement and the semantics of normative and evaluative terms. Philosopher’s Imprint, 13, 1–37.
Saul, J. (2006). Philosophical analysis and social kinds: Gender and race. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Volume, 106(1), 119–143.
Saul, J. (2012). Politically significant terms and philosophy of language: Methodological issues. In A. Superson & S. Crasnow (Eds.), Out from the shadows: Analytic feminist contributions to traditional philosophy (pp. 195–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
Scheman, N. (1997). Queering the center by centering the queer: Reflections on transsexuals and secular Jews. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminists Rethink the Self (124–162). Westview Press.
Thomasson, A. (2017). Metaphysical disputes and metalinguistic negotiation. Analytic Philosophy, 58(1), 1–28.
Weir, A. (2013). Identities and freedom: Feminist theory between power and connection. Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.