On relations between DEA-risk models and stochastic dominance efficiency tests

Central European Journal of Operations Research - Tập 22 Số 1 - Trang 13-35 - 2014
Martin Branda1, Miloš Kopa1
1Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Sokolovská 83, Prague, Czech Republic

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper W (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078–1092

Basso A, Funari S (2001) A data envelopment analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance. Eur J Oper Res 135(3):477–492

Basso A, Funari S (2003) Measuring the performance of ethical mutual funds: a DEA approach. J Oper Res Soc 54:521–531

Bawa VS, Bodurtha JN, Rao MR, Suri HL (1985) On determination of stochastic dominance optimal sets. J Financ 40:417–431

Branda M (2012a) Stochastic programming problems with generalized integrated chance constraints. Optimization 61(8):949–968

Branda M (2012b) Sample approximation technique for mixed-integer stochastic programming problems with several chance constraints. Oper Res Lett 40(3):207–211

Branda M (2012c) Diversification-consistent data envelopment analysis with general deviation measures. Eur J Oper Res. Available, online 17 November 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.007

Branda M, Dupačová J (2012) Approximations and contamination bounds for probabilistic programs. Ann Oper Res 193(1):3–19

Branda M, Kopa M (2012a) DEA-risk efficiency and stochastic dominance efficiency of stock indices. Czech J Econ Financ 62(2):106–124

Branda M, Kopa M (2012b) Equivalence of stochastic dominance and DEA-risk models. Working paper, Oper Res Lett (submitted to)

Branda M, Kopa M (2012c) From stochastic dominance to DEA-risk models: portfolio efficiency analysis. In: Sakalauskas L, Tomasgard A, Wallace SW (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop on stochastic programming for implementation and advanced applications. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania, pp 13–18

Charnes A, Cooper W (1962) Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Res Logist Q 9:181–196

Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

Chen Z, Lin R (2006) Mutual fund performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis with new risk measures. OR Spectr 28:375–398

Cook WD, Seiford LM (2009) Data envelopment analysis (DEA) thirty years on. Eur J Oper Res 192:1–17

Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis. Springer, Berlin

Daraio C, Simar L (2006) A robust nonparametric approach to evaluate and explain the performance of mutual funds. Eur J Oper Res 175(1):516–542

Dentcheva D, Ruszczynski A (2006) Portfolio optimization with stochastic dominance constraints. J Banking Financ 30(2):433–451

Dupačová J, Kopa M (2012) Robustness in stochastic programs with risk constraints. Ann Oper Res 200(1):55–74

Fábián CI, Mitra G, Roman D (2011) Processing Second-order Stochastic Dominance models using cutting-plane representations. Math Program 130(1):33–57

Fishburn PC (1974) Convex stochastic dominance with continuous distribution functions. J Econ Theory 7:143–158

Galagadera UA, Silvapulle P (2002) Australian mutual fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. Manag Financ 28(9):60–73

Gollmer R, Gotzes U, Schultz R (2011) A note on second-order stochastic dominance constraints induced by mixed-integer linear recourse. Math Program Ser A 126(1):179–190

Gotoh J-Y, Konno H (2000) Third-degree stochastic dominance and mean-risk analysis. Manag Sci 46(2):289–301

Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Pólya G (1934) Inequalities, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Hanoch G, Levy H (1969) The efficient analysis of choices involving risk. Rev Econ Stud 36(3):335–346

Jablonsky J (2012) Multicriteria approaches for ranking of efficient units in DEA models. Cent Eur J Oper Res 20(3):435–449

Kopa M (2010) Measuring of second-order stochastic dominance portfolio efficiency. Kybernetika 46(3):488–500

Kopa M, Chovanec P (2008) A second-order stochastic dominance portfolio efficiency measure. Kybernetika 44(2):243–258

Kopa M, Post T (2009) A portfolio efficiency test based on FSD optimality. J Financ Quant Anal 44(5):1103–1124

Kuosmanen T (2004) Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria. Manag Sci 50(10):1390–1406

Lamb JD, Tee K-H (2012a) Data envelopment analysis models of investment funds. Eur J Oper Res 216(3):687–696

Lamb JD, Tee K-H (2012b) Resampling DEA estimates of investment fund performance. Eur J Oper Res 223(3):834–841

Levy H (2006) Stochastic dominance: investment decision making under uncertainty, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

Lizyayev A (2012) Stochastic dominance efficiency analysis of diversified portfolios: classification, comparison and refinements. Ann Oper Res 196(1):391–410

Lozano S, Gutiérrez E (2008) Data envelopment analysis of mutual funds based on second-order stochastic dominance. Eur J Oper Res 189:230–244

Luedtke J (2008) New formulations for optimization under stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J Optim 19(3):1433–1450

Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91

Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification in investments. Wiley, New York

Meskarian R, Xu H, Fliege J (2012) Numerical methods for stochastic programs with second order dominance constraints with applications to portfolio optimization. Eur J Oper Res 216(2):376–385

Murthi BPS, Choi YK, Desai P (1997) Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: a non-parametric approach. Eur J Oper Res 98(2):408–418

von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Ogryczak W, Ruszczynski A (2001) On consistency of stochastic dominance and mean-semideviation models. Math Program Ser B 89:217–232

Ogryczak W, Ruszczynski A (2002) Dual stochastic dominance and related mean-risk models. SIAM J Optim 13:60–78

Pflug G (2000) Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. In: Uryasev SP (ed) Probabilistic constrained optimization. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 272–281

Post T (2003) Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency. J Financ 58:1905–1932

Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–41

Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Banking Financ 26:1443–1471

Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S, Zabarankin M (2006) Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Financ Stoch 10:51–74

Soleimani-damaneh M (2012) On a basic definition of returns to scale. Oper Res Lett 40(2):144–147

Whitmore GA (1970) Third-degree stochastic dominance. Am Econ Rev 60(3):457–459