On opulence driven poverty traps

Journal of Population Economics - Tập 6 - Trang 67-81 - 1993
Charles van Marrewijk1, Jos Verbeek2,3
1Department of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2Tinbergen Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3The World Bank, Washington, USA

Tóm tắt

Endogenous population growth, i.e., making the rate of population growth dependent on society's opulence, causes parametric changes to have a larger impact and can cause multiplicity of steady states in a dynamic intertemporal optimization framework. This provides a simple explanation for the possibility of differing growth paths between countries (using a standard production function) or another explanation of the ‘poverty trap’. We give two examples (‘opulence sensitivity’ and ‘production sensitivity’) that both give rise to three steady states in which poor (rich) countries will evolve over time to the low (high) income steady state. In both examples there are middle income countries that will choose the low (high) income steady state if they are impatient (patient), where patience is measured through the rate of time preference o. Foreign aid in the form of a large transfer of capital from abroad enables poor and impatient middle income countries to move to the high income steady state.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barro RJ, Becker GS (1989) Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica 57:481–501 Benhabib J, Jovanovic B (1991) Externalities and growth accounting. Am Econ Rev 81:82–113 Blanchard OJ, Fischer S (1989) Lectures on macroeconomics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Blomqvist AG, Pitchford JD (1977) Population policy, individual welfare and optimal economic growth. Mimeo Australian National University Brock WA, Malliaris AG (1989) Differential equations, stability and chaos in dynamic economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam Cigno A (1992) Children and pensions. Presidential address to the European Society for Population Economics, Pisa. J Popul Econ 5:175–183 Dechert WD, Nishimura K (1983) A complete characterization of optimal growth paths in an aggregated model with a non-concave production function. J Econ Theory 31:332–354 Dellas H, de Vries CG (1991) Piecemeal versus precipitous factor market integration. University of Leuven, CES discussion paper no. 82 Ehrlich I (1990) The problem of development: Introduction. J Polit Econ 98:s1-s11 Liviatan N, Samuelson PA (1969) Notes on turnpikes: stable and unstable. J Econ Theory 1:454–475 Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Mon Econ 22:3–42 Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107:407–437 Nelson RR (1956) A theory of the low level equilibrium trap in underdeveloped economies. Am Econ Rev 46:894–908 Pitchford JD (1974) Population in economic growth. North-Holland, Amsterdam Raut LK (1991) Capital accumulation, income distribution and endogenous fertility in an overlapping generations general equilibrium model. J Dev Econ 34:123–150 Romer PM (1986a) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1037 Romer PM (1986b) Cake eating, chattering, and jumps: Existence results for variational problems. Econometrica 54:897–908 Rosenzweig MR (1990) Population growth and human capital investments: Theory and evidence. J Polit Econ 98:08-s70 Sato R, Davis EG (1971) Optimal savings policy when labor grows endogenously. Econometrica 39:877–897 Skiba AK (1978) Optimal growth with a convex-concave production function. Econometrica 46:527–539 Unites Nations (1983) Statistical Yearbook World Bank (1987) World development report