On imaging and seeing: Repetition priming and interactive views of imagery
Tóm tắt
The interaction between perceptual and imaginal processes was investigated, with the use of the repetition-priming paradigm. The idea is that the overlap between processes employed in imagery and processes employed in perception will be reflected in the amount of transfer from one encounter with an item that engages perception or imagery and a second encounter that engages perception or imagery. The greater the overlap between perception and imagery, the greater the transfer between them should be. The results showed that perceptual and imaginal processes transferred maximally to themselves; that is, maximum transfer occurred when an item was processed in the same way on both encounters. Further, prior use of perceptual processes transferred to the use of imaginal processes, but not vice versa. These results are discussed as they relate to the interactive view of imagery, which holds that imagery relies on many of the same mental structures and processes as perception.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Corballis, M. C., & Sergent, J. (1988). Imagery in a commissurotomized patient.Neuropsychologia, 26, 13–26.
Farah, M. J. (1985). Psychophysical evidence for a shared representational medium for mental images and percepts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 91–103.
Farah, M. J., Gazzaniga, M. S., Holtzman, J. D., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1985). A left hemisphere basis for visual mental imagery?Neuropsychologia, 23, 115–118.
Finke, R. A. (1980). Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception.Psychological Review, 87, 113–132.
Finke, R. A. (1989).Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Finke, R. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1986). Visual functions of mental imagery. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. II). New York: Wiley.
Intons-Peterson, M. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (1991). Symmetries and asymmetries between imagery and perception. In C. Cornoldi & M. McDaniel (Eds.),Imagery and cognition. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Jacoby, L., & Hayman, C. A. G. (1987). Specific visual transfer in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 456–463.
Keppel, G. (1982).Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kolers, P. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1984). Procedures of mind.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 425–449.
Kosslyn, S. M., Holtzman, J. D., Farah, M. J., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1985). A computational analysis of mental image generation: Evidence from functional dissociations in split-brain patients.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 311–341.
Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501–518.
Sergent, J. (1989). Image generation and processing of generated images in the cerebral hemispheres.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 170–178.
Wippich, W., Mecklenbräuker, S., & Halfter, M. (1989). Implicit memory in spelling from word images.Psychological Research, 51, 208–216.