On Intergenerational Equity and Its Clash with Intragenerational Equity and on the Need for Policies to Guide the Regulation of Disposal of Wastes and Other Activities Posing Very Long-Term Risks
Tóm tắt
This article begins with some history of the derivation of 40 CFR Part 191, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard that governs the geologic disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level and transuranic radioactive wastes. This is followed by criticisms of the standard that were made by a Sub-Committee of the EPA Science Advisory Board, by the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and by a panel of the National Academies of Science and Engineering. The large disparity in the EPA approaches to regulation of disposal of radioactive wastes and disposal of hazardous, long-lived, nonradioactive chemical waste is illustrated. An examination of the intertwined matters of intergenerational equity and the discounting of future health effects follows, together with a discussion of the conflict between intergenerational equity and intragenerational equity. Finally, issues related to assumptions in the regulations concerning the future state of society and the biosphere are treated, as is the absence of any national philosophy or guiding policy for how to deal with societal activities that pose very long-term risks.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR Part 191– Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Wastes: Final Rule, Federal Register 50(182), 38066–38089(1985).
F. L. Galpin, R. L. Clark, and C. Petti, An Inside Look at the 40 CFR 191 Containment Requirements, Proc. Int Conf. on Waste Management, Las Vegas, April 1992.
Environmental Protection Agency, High-Level and Transuranic Wastes: Background Information Document for Final Rule, EPA 520/1–85–023, August 1985.
J. Martin, Recollections, Talk presented to the Board on Radioactive Waste Management, National Academy of Science, September 22, 1992.
National Academy of Sciences, Waste Isolation Systems Panel, AStudy of the Isolation System for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Wastes (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1983).
Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board, Report on the Review of Proposed Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes (40 CFR 191), High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Advisory Subcommittee, January 1984.
Environmental Protection Agency, High-Level and Transuranic Wastes: Response to Comments for Final Rule, EPA 520/ 1–85–024–2, 1985.
Environmental Protection Agency, “40 CFR Part 191: Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes, Proposed Rule”, Federal Register 47, 58196 (1982).
Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR Part 191, Working Draft 2, January 31, 1990.
Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR Part 191, Working Draft 3, April 26, 1991.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Letter dated August 27, 1990 from R. F. Browning of USNRC to R. Guimond of EPA.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Letter dated October 23, 1991 from R. M. Bernero of USNRC to M. Oge of EPA.
Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste, Letter dated December 21, 1989to Hon. K. M. Carr, Chairman, USNRC, Subject: Comments on Proposed Revisions of EPA's High-Level Waste Standards.
Environmental Protection Agency, Population Risks from Uranium Ore Bodies, EPA520/3–8–009, October 1980.
National Academy of Sciences, Board on Radioactive Waste Management, Rethinking High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1990).
Environmental Protection Agency, Regulatory Impact Analysis for EPA's High-Level Waste Standard (40 CFR Part 191), Draft, 402–R-92–007, August 1992.
C. E. Foutes, Economic Aspects of EPA's HLW Draft Proposed Legislation, Proc. Conf. Waste Management’ 91, Tucson, February 24–28, 1991.
National Energy Policy Act of 1992, Public Law 102–486, 106 Stat. 2776 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 13201 et seq.
A. Cornelissen, Development on Criteria for Geologic Waste Disposal in the Netherlands, Proc. of NEA Workshop, Paris, November 5–7, 1991, 71–80.
D. Okrent, On Intergenerational Equity and Policies to Guide the Regulation of Disposal of Wastes Posing very Long-Term Risks, University of California, Los Angeles Report, UCLA ENG-22–94.
B. Ross, Disposal Safety, Personal communication.
T. P. Wagner, The Complete Guide to the Hazardous Waste Regulations (Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991).
Environmental Protection Agency, Report to Congress: Wastes from the Combustion of Coal by Electric Utility Power Plants, EPA/530–SW-88–002, 1988.
Environmental Protection Agency, “40 CFR Part 261, Regulatory Determination for Wastes from the Extraction and Bene-ficiation of Ore and Minerals,” Federal Register 51(128), pp. 24496–24502(1986).
Environmental Protection Agency, “40 CFR Part 261, Special Wastes from Mineral Processing (Mining Waste Exclusion): Final Regulatory Determination and Final Rule,” Federal Register 56,(114), pp. 27300–27330(1991).
Environmental Protection Agency, Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems, Office of Policy Analysis, February 1987.
Environmental Protection Agency, Stabilization/Solidification ofCERCLAandRCRAWastes,EPA/625/6–89/022,May1989.
Science Advisory Board, EPA, Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection, SAB-EC-90–021, September 1990.
J. V. Rodricks, Brett, S. M., and Renn, G. C., “Significant Risk Decisions in Federal Regulatory Agencies,” Regulatory Toxicol.Pharmacol. 7, 307–320(1987).
C. B. Doty and C. C. Travis, “The Superfund Remedial Action Decision Process: A Review of Fifty Records of Decision”, JAPCA Journal, 39(12), 1535 (1989).
Environmental Protection Agency, “40 CFR Part 300, National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan: Final Rule,” Federal Register 55(46), 8666–8865(1990).
Environmental Protection Agency, “40 CFR Part 91, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes, Final Rule,” Federal Register 58(242), 66398–66416(1993).
D. Okrent and L. Xing, “Future Risk from a Hypothesized RCRA Site Disposing of Carcinogenic Metals, Should a Loss of Societal Memory Occur,”J.Hazardous Materials, 38, 363–384 (1993).
R. Z. Shu and D. Okrent, On the Need for Policy Regarding Risks Arising Hundreds or Thousands of Years in the Future from Hazardous Waste Sites and Municipal Land Fills, Proc. Int. Conf. Probabilistic Safety assessment and Management (PSAM 4), Vol. 2, New York City, September 13–18, 1998, pp. 1675–1680.
E. Brown Weiss, In Fairness to Future Generations (Transnational Publishers, 1989).
A. C. Kadak, The Societal Fairness of Intergenerational Equity, Proc. Int. conf. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 4), Vol. 2, New York City, September 13–18, 1998, pp. 1005–1010.
R. Coulon, Criteria and Basic Objectives for Radiological Protection: An Overview of Existing International Criteria and Recommendations to Evaluate High Activity Wastes, in Proc. Of OECD Nuclear Energy Agency W, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes: Radiation Protection and Safety Criteria, Paris, November 5–7, 1991.
National Academy of Sciences, Decision Making in the Environmental Protection Agency (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1977).
R. L. Keeney, “Understanding Life-Threatening Risks.” Risk Analysis 15(6), 627 (1995).
K. J. Arrow, “Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health and Safety Regulation?,” Science 272, 221 (1996).
R. B. Belzer, Star-Trek Economics: Discounting and Warps in the Space-Time Continuum, Proc. Int. Conf. On Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 4), New York City, Vol. 4, September 13–18, 1998, pp. 2359–2364.
D. E. MacLean, “Comparing Values in Environmental Policies: Moral Issues and Moral Arguments” in Valuing Health Risks, Costs and Benefits for Environmental Decision Making (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1990).
B. L. Cohen, “Discounting in Assessment of Future Radiation Effects,” Health Physics 45(3), 4687 (1983).
D. J. Egan, Jr., “EPA's Environmental Standards for High Level Radioactive Waste Disposal,” Waste Management 1, 31 (1983).
ICRP, Radiation Protection Principals for the Disposal of Solid Radioactive Waste, Publication 46, Annals of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 15(4) (1985).
Nordic Authorities, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste-Consideration of Some Basic Criteria-AConsultative Document, Report of Radiation Protection and Safety Authorities in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 1989.
National Academy of Sciences, Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain Standards, (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1995).
M. L. Cropper, S. K. Aydede, and P. R. Portney, Discounting Human Lives (Resources for the Future, June 1991).
Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR Part 191: Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Wastes, Draft Federal Register Notice dated February 3, 1992.
S. Kaplan, and B. J. Garrick, Towards a Realistic Assessment of the Intrusion Scenario, Proc. EPRI Workshop 1, September 24–26, 1991.
J. Jowett, and N. A. Chapman, UK Studies of Intrusion Frequency, Proc. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Workshop, Paris, June 5–7, 1989.
S. C. Hora, D. von Winterfeldt, and K. M. Trauth, Expert Judgment on Inadvertent Human Intrusion into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND-3063, December 1991.
B. L. Cohen, Situations in Which the Problem Disappears, p. C-77 of SAND-3063, ibid.
Nordic Authorities, Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Waste: Consideration of Some Basic Criteria, The Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Authorities in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, 1993.
Environmental Protection Agency, Background Information Document for the Repromulgation of 40 CFR Part 191, Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes, Final Draft, September 1989.
K. D. Walker, Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Personal communication, 1993.