On Fair Person Classification Based on Efficient Factor Score Estimates in the Multidimensional Factor Analysis Model

Psychometrika - Tập 83 - Trang 563-585 - 2018
Pascal Jordan1, Martin Spiess1
1University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

Since Hooker, Finkelman and Schwartzman (Psychometrika 74(3): 419–442, 2009) it is known that person parameter estimates from multidimensional latent variable models can induce unfair classifications via paradoxical scoring effects. The open question as to whether there is a fair and at the same time multidimensional scoring scheme with adequate statistical properties is addressed in this paper. We develop a theorem on the existence of a fair, multidimensional classification scheme in the context of the classical linear factor analysis model and show how the computation of the scoring scheme can be embedded in the context of linear programming. The procedure is illustrated in the framework of scoring the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV).

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bartholomew, D. J. (1996). Comment on: Metaphor taken as math: Indeterminacy in the factor analysis model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(4), 551–554. Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2010). Investigation of the factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): Exploratory and higher order factor analyses. Psychological Assessment, 22(4), 827–836. Ellis, J. L., & Junker, B. W. (1997). Tail-measurability in monotone latent variable models. Psychometrika, 62(4), 495–523. Finkelman, M. D., Hooker, G., & Wang, Z. (2010). Prevalence and magnitude of paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(6), 744–761. Gignac, G. E., & Watkins, M. W. (2013). Bifactor modeling and the estimation of model-based reliability in the WAIS-IV. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(5), 639–662. Guttman, L. (1955). The determinacy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common? Factor theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 8(2), 65–81. Hampel, P., & Petermann, F. (2006). Fragebogen zum Screening psychischer Störungen im Jugendalter (SPS-J). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 35(3), 204–214. Holland, P. W. (1994). Measurements or contests? Comments on Zwick, Bond and Allen/Donoghue. In Proceedings of the social statistics section of the American Statistical Association (pp. 27–29). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Hooker, G., Finkelman, M., & Schwartzman, A. (2009). Paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika, 74(3), 419–442. Hooker, G. (2010). On separable tests, correlated priors, and paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika, 75(4), 694–707. Hooker, G., & Finkelman, M. (2010). Paradoxical results and item bundles. Psychometrika, 75(2), 249–271. Jordan, P., & Spiess, M. (2017). Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9588-3. Jordan, P., & Spiess, M. (2012). Generalizations of paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika, 77, 127–152. Krijnen, W. P., Dijkstra, T. K., & Gill, R. D. (1998). Conditions for factor (in) determinacy in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 63(4), 359–367. Lax, P. D. (2007). Linear algebra and its applications (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Lee, S. Y. (2007). Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach (1st ed.). Hoboken: Wiley. Maraun, M. D. (1996). Metaphor taken as math: Indeterminacy in the factor analysis model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(4), 517–538. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press. McDonald, R. P. (1996). Latent traits and the possibility of motion. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(4), 593–601. Mulaik, S. A. (1996). On Maraun’s deconstructing of factor indeterminancy with constructed factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(4), 579–592. Mulaik, S. A. (1994). Kant, Wittgenstein, objectivity, and structural equations modeling. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Advances in cognitive assessment: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 209–236). New York: Plenum. Nesterov, Y., & Nemirovskii, A. (1994). Interior-point polynomial algorithms in convex programming. Philadelphia: SIAM. R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 25 Sept 2017. Reckase, M. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. New York: Springer. Reckase, M. D., & Luo, X. (2015). A paradox by another name is good estimation. In R. E. Milsap, D. M. Bolt, A. van der Ark, & W. C. Wang (Eds.), Quantitative psychology research: The 78th annual meeting of the psychometric society (pp. 465–486). New York: Springer. Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rockafellar, R. T., & Wets, R. J. B. (2009). Variational analysis (317th ed.). Berlin: Springer. Searle, S. R., Casella, G., & McCulloch, C. E. (2006). Variance components. New York: Wiley. Segall, D. O. (2000). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 27–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Soetaert, K., Van den Meersche, K., & van Oevelen, D. (2009). limSolve: Solving linear inverse models. R-package version 1.5.1. Steiger, J. H. (1979). Factor indeterminacy in the 1930’s and the 1970’s some interesting parallels. Psychometrika, 44(2), 157–167. van der Linden, W. J. (2012). On compensation in multidimensional response modeling. Psychometrika, 77(1), 21–30. van Rijn, P. W., & Rijmen, F. (2012). A note on explaining away and paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory (ETS No. RR-12-13). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. van Rijn, P., & Rijmen, F. (2015). On the explaining-away phenomenon in multivariate latent variable models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 68(1), 1–22. Ward, L. C., Bergman, M. A., & Hebert, K. R. (2012). WAIS-IV subtest covariance structure: Conceptual and statistical considerations. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 328–340. Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Technical and interpretive manual (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Wilson, E. B. (1928). Review of professor Spearman’s “the abilities of man”. Science, 67, 244–248.