On Dutch windows
Tóm tắt
In The Netherlands, living room windows are big, left uncovered day and night, and elaborately decorated. This pattern, which is widespread in all urban and rural regions in this country, disappears abruptly as soon as the border into Germany is crossed where windows are generally smaller, consistently covered, and more sparsely decorated. Going south into Flanders, the disappearance of open and decorated windows is gradual but noticeable. The cognitive and sensory meaning of a single object in material culture, the Dutch window, is examined as a concrete articulation of the boundary between the public and private realms by “thinking it with” successive conceptual frames in sociology. Assuming that material objects are embodiments of ideas, the study focuses on (a) the norms for looking and for looking out of the windows, (b) the territorial boundary being established and, (c) the information game played through the windows in a context of the notion of privacy. Photographs of the cultural objects under consideration, i.e., Dutch windows, are presented throughout the text as reminders that the cultural and material realms are sensually linked. The study concludes that objects in material culture must be examined in terms of the active, purposive acts we accomplish by adapting the objects to our practical and expressive needs.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bates, A. 1964 “Privacy: A Useful Concept?” Social Forces 43: 432–37.
Berardo F. 1974 “Marital Invisibility and Family Privacy.” In Stephen T. Marguilis (Ed.) Man Environment Interactions: Evaluations and Applications. Vol. 6. pp. 36–48. Milwakee, Wisconsin: Environmental Design Research Association.
Clay, G. 1980 Close-Up: How to Read the American City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
De Weert, A. A. G. M. 1976 Belevings -en gebruikswaarde verbonden met ramen en overige binnen/buitenverbindingen van woningen. Amsterdam: Nationale Woningraad.
Douglas, M. & Isherwood B. 1979 World of Goods. New York: Basic Books.
Durkheim, E. 1969 The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.
Foucault, M. 1977 Discipline and Punish. Alan Sheridan (trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
Galle, O. R., Gove, W. R. & McPherson, J. M. 1970 “Population Density and Pathology.” Science 176: 23–30.
1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday and Company.
1969 Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goudsblom, J. 1967 Dutch Society. New York: Random House.
Groenman, S. 1981 Personal communication.
Jacobs, J. 1961 The Death and Life of American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
Jourard, S. 1971 The Transparent Self. New York: Van Nostrand.
Lyman, S. M. & Scott, M. B. 1967 “Territoriality: A Neglected Sociological Dimension.” Social Problems 15 (2).
Marcuse, H. 1978 The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marx, K. 1973 Grundisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Martin Nicolaus (trans. and intro.). Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
1967a Manuel d'Ethnographie. Paris: Editions Payot.
1967b The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. E. E. Evans-Pritchard (intro.), Ian Cunnison (trans.) New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Mukerji, C. 1983 From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism. Columbia University Press.
Newspaper Enterprize Association 1984 World Almanac. New York: Newspaper Enterprize Association.
Riemersma, J. C. 1967 Religious Factors in Early Dutch Capitalism 1550–1650. The Hague: Mouton.
Simmel, G. 1964 The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Kurt Wolff (trans., ed., and intro.) New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Schama, S. 1987 The Embarrassment of Riches. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Social and Cultural Planning Office 1978 Social and Cultural Report. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office.
Weber, M. 1978 Economy and Society. G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Westin, A. 1967 Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.