Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors

Theoretical Medicine - 1992
Eugene Garfield1, Alfred Welljams-Dorof1
1Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, USA

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this paper was to determine if quantitative rankings of highly cited research authors confirm Nobel prize awards. Six studies covering different time periods and author sample sizes were reviewed. The number of Nobel laureates at the time each study was published was tabulated, as was the number of high impact authors who later became laureates. The Nobelists and laureates-to-be were also compared with non-Nobelists to see if they differed in terms of impact and productivity. The results indicate that high rankings by citation frequency identify researchersof Nobel class — that is, a small set of authors that includes a high proportion of actual Nobelists and laureates-to-be. Also, the average impact (citations per author) of Nobelists and laureates-to-be is sufficiently high to distinguish them from non-Nobelists in these rankings. In conclusion, a simple, quantitative, and objective algorithm based on citation data can effectively corroborate —and even forecast — a complex, qualitative, and subjective selection process based on human judgement.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Zuckerman H.Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: The Free Press, 1977.

Garfield E. Citation indexing for studying science.Nature 1970;227:669–71.

Garfield E. More on forecasting Nobel Prizes and the most-cited scientists of 1972! In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 1. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1977:487–8.

Garfield E. The 250 most-cited primary authors, 1961–1975. Part I. How the names were selected. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:326–36.

Garfield E. The 250 most-cited primary authors, 1961–1975. Part II. The correlation between citedness, Nobel Prizes, and academy memberships. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:337–47.

Garfield E. The 250 most-cited primary authors, 1961–1975. Part III. Each author's most-cited publication. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:348–63.

Garfield E. The 300 most-cited authors, 1961–1976, including co-authors at last. 1. How the names were selected. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:538–50.

Garfield E. The 300 most-cited authors, 1961–1976, including co-authors. Part 2. The relationship between citedness, awards, and academy memberships. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:587–612.

Garfield E. The 300 most-cited authors, 1961–1976, including co-authors. 3A. Their most-cited papers — introduction and journal analysis. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:689–700.

Garfield E. The 300 most-cited authors, 1961–1976, including co-authors. 3B. Their most-cited papers and a correction note. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:701–10.

Garfield E. The 300 most-cited authors, 1961–1976, including co-authors. 3C. Their most-cited papers and affiliation data. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:711–22.

Garfield E. The 1,000 contemporary scientists most-cited 1965–1978. Part 1. The basic list and introduction. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 5. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1983:269–78.

Garfield E. The 1,000 most-cited contemporary authors. Part 2A. Details on authors in the physical and chemical sciences and some comments about Nobels and academy memberships. In: Garfield E.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 5. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1983:428–36.

Garfield E. The 1,000 most-cited contemporary authors. Part 2B. Details on authors in biochemistry, biophysics, cell biology, enzymology, genetics, molecular biology, and plant sciences. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 5. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1983:533–41.

Garfield E. The 1,000 most-cited contemporary authors. Part 2C. Details on authors in hematology, histology, immunology, microbiology, physiology, and virology. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 5. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1983:542–50.

Garfield E. The 1,000 most-cited contemporary authors. Part 2D. Details on authors in cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, nephrology, neurobiology, neurology, neuropharmacology, nuclear medicine, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, psychiatry, and surgery. In: Garfield E,Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 5. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1983:562–70.

Garfield E. The 1,000 most-cited contemporary scientists. Part 3. Details on their current institutional affiliations. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 5. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1983:591–606.

Garfield E. Are the 1979 prizewinnersof Nobel class? In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 4. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1981:609–17.

Cole JR, Cole S.Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973.

Cole S, Cole JR. Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science.American Sociological Review 1967;32:377–90.

Bayer AE, Folger J. Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science.Sociology of Education 1966;39:381–90.

Sher IH, Garfield E. New tools for improving and evaluating the effectiveness of research. In: Yovits MC, Gilford DM, Wilcox RH, Staveley E, Lemer HD, eds.Research Program Effectiveness. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1966:135–46.

Pendlebury D. The 1989 Nobel Prize in medicine: 20 who deserve it.The Scientist 1989 Oct 2:14(col 1), 16(col 1), 19(col 3).

Garfield E. Who will win the Nobel Prize in economics? Here's a forecast based on citation indicators.Current Contents 1990; Mar 12:3–7.

Garfield E. The 100 most-cited authors of 20th century literature. Can citation data forecast the Nobel Prize in literature? In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 4. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1981:363–9.

Garfield E. Citation classics. 2. Articles from the life sciences 1930–39. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 2. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1977:611–16.

Garfield E. Citation classics. 3. Articles from the physical sciences published in the 1930s. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 2. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1977:617–22.

Garfield E. Highly cited articles. 35. Biochemistry papers published in the 1940s. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:45–51.

Garfield E. Highly cited articles. 36. Physics, chemistry and mathematics papers published in the 1940s. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:54–60.

Garfield E. Highly cited articles. 37. Biomedical articles published in the 1940s. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:76–83.

Garfield E. Highly cited articles. 38. Physics and chemistry papers published in the 1950s. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:125–9.

Garfield E. Highly cited articles. 39. Biochemistry papers published in the 1950s. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:147–54.

Garfield E. Highly cited articles. 40. Biomedical and behavioral papers published in the 1950s. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 3. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980:179–86.

Garfield E. Most-cited articles of the 1960s. 1. Physical sciences. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 4. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1981:156–66.

Garfield E. Most-cited articles of the 1960s. 2. Biochemistry and molecular biology. In: Garfield E. ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 4. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1981:254–63.

Garfield E. Most-cited articles of the 1960s. 3. Preclinical basic research. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 4. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1981:370–8

Garfield E. Most-cited articles of the 1960s. 4. Clinical research. In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 4. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1981:379–88.

Garfield E. The 100 most-cited papers ever and how we selectCitation Classics. In: Garfield E, ed.The Awards of Science and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1985:175–81. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 7).

Garfield E. The articles most cited in 1961–1982. 2. Another 100Citation Classics highlight the technology of science. In: Garfield E, ed.The Awards of Science and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1985:218–27. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 7).

Garfield E. The articles most cited in 1961–1982. 3. Another 100 all-timeCitation Classics. In: Garfield E, ed.The Awards of Science and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1985:270–6. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 7).

Garfield E. The articles most cited in 1961–1982. 4. 100 additionalCitation Classics. In: Garfield E, ed.The Awards of Science and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1985:306–12. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 7).

Garfield E. The articles most cited in 1961–1982. 5. Another 100Citation Classics and a summary of the 500 papers identified to date. In: Garfield E, ed.The Awards of Science and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1985:326–35. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 7).

Garfield E. The articles most cited in theSCI from 1961 to 1982. 6. MoreCitation Classics to think about. In: Garfield E, ed.Ghostwriting and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1986:132–9. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 8).

Garfield E. The articles most cited in theSCI from 1961 to 1982. 7. Another 100Citation Classics: the Watson-Crick double helix has its turn. In: Garfield E, ed.Ghostwriting and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1986:187–96. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 8).

Garfield E. The articles most cited in theSCI from 1961 to 1982. 8. Ninety-eight more classic papers from unimolecular reaction velocities to natural opiates: the changing frontiers of science. In: Garfield E, ed.Ghostwriting and Other Essays. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1986:311–19. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 8).

Garfield E. The articles most cited in theSCI, 1961–1982. 9. More contemporary classics of science. In: Garfield E, ed.Towards Scientography. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1988:55–64. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 9).

Garfield E. The 1,000 articles most cited in 1961–1982. 10. Another 100 citation classics cap the millenary. In: Garfield E, ed.Towards Scientography. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1988:118–29. (Essays of an Information Scientist; Vol 9).

Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr Al, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.J Biol Chem 1951;193:265–75.

Merton RK.On the Shoulders of Giants: a Shandean Postscript. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1965.

Garfield E. The ‘obliteration phenomenon’ in science — and the advantage of being obliterated! In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 2. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1977:396–8.

Watson JD, Crick FHC. Molecular structure of nucleic acids.Nature 1953;171:737–8.

Garfield E. Premature discovery or delayed recognition — why? In: Garfield E, ed.Essays of an Information Scientist. Vol 4. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1981:488–93.

Zuckerman H, Lederberg J. Postmature scientific discovery?Nature 1986;324:629–31.

Garfield E. The most-cited papers of all time,SCI 1945–1988. Part 1A. TheSCI Top 100 — will the Lowry method ever be obliterated?Current Contents 1990; Feb 12:3–14.

Garfield E. The most-cited papers of all time,SCI 1945–1988. Part 2. The second 100Citation Classics. Current Contents 1990; June 25:3–13.

Garfield E. The most-cited papers of all time,SCI 1945–1988. Part 3. Another 100 from theCitation Classics hall of fame.Current Contents 1990; Aug 20:3–13.

Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents.Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1973;24:265–9.

Small H, Garfield E. The geography of science: discipinary and national mappings.Journal of Information Science 1985;147–59.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Theoretical Medicine

Thông tin tác giả