Occupying New Spaces: the “Digital Turn” of Afro-Brazilian Religions During the Covid-19 Outbreak

International Journal of Latin American Religions - Tập 4 - Trang 250-258 - 2020
Giovanna Capponi1, Patrício Carneiro Araújo2
1Département de la recherche et de l’enseignement, Musée du quai Branly, Paris, France
2Instituto de Humanidades, Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira (UNILAB), Redenção, Brazil

Tóm tắt

This paper intends to analyze how Afro-Brazilian religious minorities (like Candomblé and Umbanda) are responding to the Covid-19 crisis in Brazil both at a religious and political level. Drawing a comparison between the reactions of Neo-Pentecostal churches and Afro-Brazilian religions, we will describe how the pandemic outbreak and the social distancing measures allowed Afro-religious practitioners to occupy new online spaces. In doing so, these religions found new modalities of practising rituals and transmitting sacred knowledge in the digital world. Despite the fundamental importance of bodily engagement in these religious expressions, Candomblé and Umbanda practitioners are increasing their presence online through producing different types of pedagogical, educational and ritual contents. While on the one hand, this new content aims at promoting social distancing and sanitary precautionary measures, on the other hand, it involves a restructuring of the dynamics of legitimation and power that are present in Afro-religious social structures. We will analyze these changing dynamics as consequences of the “crisis of the body” that resulted from the lockdown measures.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Beliso-De Jesús AM (2015) Electric Santería. Racial and sexual assemblages of transnational religion. Columbia University Press, New York Capponi G, Carneiro Araújo P (2015) “Eu me declaro”: diálogo sobre transformações, autodefinições e reivindicações políticas nos cultos afro brasileiros, In. II Simpósio Sudeste ABHR: Gênero e religião: Violência, fundamentalismos e política, PUC/SP: São Paulo Carneiro E (1969) Candomblés da Bahia. Rio de Janeiro: Tecnoprint Carneiro Araújo P (2016) Ekodidé no sambódromo: segredo ritual, candomblé e espaço público no carnaval paulistano. Áltera – Revista de Antropologia 2(3):13–36 Castillo L Earl (2008) Entre a oralidade e a escrita: a etnografia nos candomblés da Bahia. Salvador: Edufba da Silva V Gonçalves (2007) “Neopentecostalismo e religiões afrobrasileiras: significado do ataque aos símbolos da herança religiosa africana no Brasil contemporâneo”, in Mana 13(1):207–237 Grossi A (2020) Religion on lockdown: on the articulation of Vodu, media and science. Religious Matters in an Entangled World. https://religiousmatters.nl/religion-on-lockdown-on-the-articulation-of-vodu-media-and-science/. Accessed 28 Sep 2020 Hartikainen EI (2020) “Religion, law, and Bolsonaro’s decree on essential services.” Covid-19, Fieldsights, May 12. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/religion-law-and-bolsonaros-decree-on-essential-services. Last accessed 20 Jun 2020 Kramer WE (2005) “Spectacle and the staging of power in Brazilian Neo Pentecostalism” in: Latin American Perspectives 32 (1): 95–120 Mariano R (2004) Expansão Pentecostal no Brasil: O Caso da Igreja Universal. Estudos Avançados 18(52):121–138 Martini M (2020) 2020. “Interdenominational cooperation in religious new media projects: the case of the Christian Media Center”. In: International Journal of Latin American Religions 4, 137–147 Mason M Atwood (2002) Living Santería: rituals and experiences in an afro-Cuban religion. Washington DC: Smithsonian Books Meyer B (2009) Aesthetic formations: media, religion, and the senses. Palgrave Macmillian, New York Meyer B (2011) Mediation and immediacy: sensational forms, semiotic ideologies and the question of the medium. Soc Anthropol 19(1):23–39 Reinhardt B (2020) Atmospheric presence: reflections on “mediation” in the anthropology of religion and technology. Anthropol Q 93(1):1523–1553 Stolow J (2005) Religion and/as media. Theory Cult Soc 22(4):119–146 Van de Port M (2020) Moonlight. Mater Relig 16(1):110–112