Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis

Peter P.C.C. Verbeek1
1Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Boucher, J. (2004). Ultrasound: A window to the womb? Obstetric ultrasound and the abortion rights debate. Journal of Medical Humanities, 25, 7–19.

De Vries, G. (1993). Gerede twijfel: over de rol van de medische ethiek in Nederland. Amsterdam: De Balie.

Dorrestijn, S. (2004). Bestaanskunst in de technologische cultuur: over de ethiek van door techniek beïnvloed gedrag. Master’s thesis. University of Twente, The Netherlands.

Foucault, M. (1984a). L’usage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.

Foucault, M. (1984b). Le souci de soi. Paris: Gallimard.

Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth In P. Rabinow (Ed.), New York: New Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.

Heidegger, M. (1969). Discourse on thinking (trans: Anderson, J.M. & Freund, E.H.). New York: Harper & Row.

Hottois, G. (1996). Symbool en techniek. Kampen/Kapellen: Kok Agora/Pelckmans.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ihde, D. (1998). Expanding hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Landsman, G. H. (1998). Reconstructing motherhood in the age of “perfect” babies: Mothers of infants and toddlers with disabilities. Signs, 24, 69–99.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith, C.). London: Routledge.

Mitchell, L. (2001). Baby’s first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

O’Leary, T. (2002). Foucault. The art of ethics. London/New York: Continuum.

Oaks, L. (2000). Smoke-filled wombs and fragile fetuses: The social politics of fetal representation. Signs, 26, 63–108.

Petchesky, R. P. (1987). Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies, 13, 263–292.

Rapp, R. (1998). Refusing prenatal diagnosis: The meanings of bioscience in a multicultural world. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 23, 45–70.

Sandelowski, M. (1994). Separate, but less unequal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood. Gender and Society, 8, 230–245.

Smith, A. (2003). Do you believe in ethics? Latour and Ihde in the trenches of the Science Wars (Or: Watch out, Latour, Ihde’s got a gun). In D. Ihde & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality. (pp. 182–194). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Stormer, N. (2000). Prenatal space. Signs, 26, 109–144.

Trouw (2006, 11 December). Abortus om hazenlip komt voor-onderzoeken of echo’s leiden tot meer zwangerschapsafbrekingen. (newspaper article).

Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Penn State University Press.

Verbeek, P. P. (2006a). The morality of things—A postphenomenological inquiry. In E. Selinger (Ed.), Postphenomenology: A critical companion to Ihde. (pp. 117–130). New Albany: SUNY Press.

Verbeek, P. P. (2006b). Ethiek en technologie: moreel actorschap en subjectiviteit in een technologische cultuur. Ethische Perspectieven, 16, 267–289.

Zechmeister, I. (2001). Foetal images: The power of visual technology in antenatal care and the implications for women’s reproductive freedom. Health Care Analysis, 9, 387–400.