Observed Inflation Forecasts and the New Keynesian Phillips Curve*

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics - Tập 71 Số 3 - Trang 375-398 - 2009
Chengsi Zhang1, Denise R. Osborn2, Dong Heon Kim3
1School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China (e‐mail: [email protected])
2Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research, Economics, University of
Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK (e‐mail: [email protected])
3Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea, and Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research, Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (e-mail: [email protected])

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis paper investigates the empirical success of the New Keynesian Phillips Curve (NKPC) in explaining US inflation when observed measures of inflation expectations are used in conjunction with the output gap. The paper contributes to the literature by addressing the important problem of serial correlation in the stylized NKPC and developing an extended model to account for this serial correlation. Contrary to recent results indicating no role for the output gap, we find it to be a statistically significant driving variable for inflation, with this finding robust to whether the inflation expectations series used relates to individual consumers, professional forecasters or the US Fed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adam K., 2003, Inflation Dynamics and Subjective Expectations in the United States, 10.2139/ssrn.313140

10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.04.006

10.1111/1468-2362.00019

Bernanke B. S., 1992, ‘The federal funds rate and the channels of monetary transmission’, American Economic Review, 82, 901

Boivin J., 2002, ‘Assessing changes in the monetary transmission mechanism: a VAR approach’, Economic Policy Review, 8, 97

10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0

10.1257/jel.37.4.1661

10.1162/003355300554692

Croushore D., 1993, ‘Introducing: the survey of professional forecasters’, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, 3

10.1162/003465303762687730

10.2307/2953698

10.2307/2118513

Fuhrer J. C., 1995, ‘Monetary policy trade‐offs and the correlation between nominal interest rates and real output’, American Economic Review, 85, 219

10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.10.004

10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00023-9

10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00105-7

10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.08.005

10.1016/S0169-2070(02)00075-4

10.2307/2109979

Goodfriend M., 1997, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, 231

10.2307/1912775

10.1162/0034653043125158

10.1198/073500104000000118

Judd P., 1998, ‘Taylor's rule and the fed: 1970–1997’, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, 3, 3

10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.08.007

10.1111/j.1468-0084.2004.00095.x

10.1353/mcb.2005.0031

10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00005-7

10.1353/mcb.2006.0008

10.1016/S0304-3932(98)00024-5

10.1257/aer.91.4.964

10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00065-5

10.1353/mcb.2004.0013

10.2307/2077783

Roberts J. M., 1998, Inflation Expectations and the Transmission of Monetary Policy, 10.17016/FEDS.1998.43

Roberts J. M., 2005, ‘How well does New Keynesian sticky‐price model fit the data’, Contributions to Macroeconomics, 5, 1

10.1257/aer.90.3.429

10.1086/261117

10.1086/654340

10.1353/mcb.2005.0023

10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.08.006

10.1257/000282806776157560

10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00019.x

10.1111/1468-0297.00036

10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00111-8

10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.08.010

Stock J. H., 2003, Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression

10.1002/jae.760

10.1111/1467-9442.00160

10.1086/260845

10.1257/aer.91.2.232

Woodford M., 2003, Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy

10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00131.x