Nursing documentation and its relationship with perceived nursing workload: a mixed-methods study among community nurses
Tóm tắt
The time that nurses spent on documentation can be substantial and burdensome. To date it was unknown if documentation activities are related to the workload that nurses perceive. A distinction between clinical documentation and organizational documentation seems relevant. This study aims to gain insight into community nurses’ views on a potential relationship between their clinical and organizational documentation activities and their perceived nursing workload. A convergent mixed-methods design was used. A quantitative survey was completed by 195 Dutch community nurses and a further 28 community nurses participated in qualitative focus groups. For the survey an online questionnaire was used. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests, Spearman’s rank correlations and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to analyse the survey data. Next, four qualitative focus groups were conducted in an iterative process of data collection - data analysis - more data collection, until data saturation was reached. In the qualitative analysis, the six steps of thematic analysis were followed. The majority of the community nurses perceived a high workload due to documentation activities. Although survey data showed that nurses estimated that they spent twice as much time on clinical documentation as on organizational documentation, the workload they perceived from these two types of documentation was comparable. Focus-group participants found organizational documentation particularly redundant. Furthermore, the survey indicated that a perceived high workload was not related to actual time spent on clinical documentation, while actual time spent on organizational documentation was related to the perceived workload. In addition, the survey showed no associations between community nurses’ perceived workload and the user-friendliness of electronic health records. Yet focus-group participants did point towards the impact of limited user-friendliness on their perceived workload. Lastly, there was no association between the perceived workload and whether the nursing process was central in the electronic health records. Community nurses often perceive a high workload due to clinical and organizational documentation activities. Decreasing the time nurses have to spend specifically on organizational documentation and improving the user-friendliness and intercommunicability of electronic health records appear to be important ways of reducing the workload that community nurses perceive.
Tài liệu tham khảo
McCarthy B, Fitzgerald S, O'Shea M, Condon C, Hartnett-Collins G, Clancy M, et al. Electronic nursing documentation interventions to promote or improve patient safety and quality care: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(3):491–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12727.
Paans W, Nieweg RM, van der Schans CP, Sermeus W. What factors influence the prevalence and accuracy of nursing diagnoses documentation in clinical practice? A systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(17–18):2386–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03573.x.
Blair W, Smith B. Nursing documentation: frameworks and barriers. Contemp Nurse. 2012;41(2):160–8. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2012.41.2.160.
De Groot K, De Veer AJE, Paans W, Francke AL. Use of electronic health records in relation to standardized terminologies: a nationwide survey of nursing staff experiences. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;104:103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103523.
Jefferies D, Johnson M, Griffiths R. A meta-study of the essentials of quality nursing documentation. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010;16(2):112–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01815.x.
De Groot K, Triemstra M, Paans W, Francke AL. Quality criteria, instruments and requirements for nursing documentation: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(7):1379–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13919.
Wang N, Hailey D, Yu P. Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(9):1858–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05634.x.
Flemming D, Hübner U. How to improve change of shift handovers and collaborative grounding and what role does the electronic patient record system play? Results of a systematic literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(7):580–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.004.
Cooper AL, Brown JA, Eccles SP, Cooper N, Albrecht MA. Is nursing and midwifery clinical documentation a burden? An empirical study of perception versus reality. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30(11–12):1645–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15718.
Heuer AJ, Parrott JS, Percival D, Kacmarek RM. Examining the phenomenon of the administrative burden in health care, allied health and respiratory care. J Allied Health. 2016;45(2):152–6.
Bøgeskov BO, Grimshaw-Aagaard SLS. Essential task or meaningless burden? Nurses’ perceptions of the value of documentation. Nordic J Nurs Res. 2019;39(1):9–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057158518773906.
OECD. Tackling wasteful spending on health. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266414-en.
Sum MT, Chebor MA. Documentation: historical perspectives, purposes, benefits and challenges as faced by nurses. Int J Humanit Soc Sci. 2013;3(16):236–40.
Roumeliotis N, Parisien G, Charette S, Arpin E, Brunet F, Jouvet P. Reorganizing care with the implementation of electronic medical records: a time-motion study in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(4):e172–e9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001450.
Royal College of Nursing. Nurses spend 2.5 million hours a week on paper work - RCN survey. London: Royal College of Nursing; 2013.
Schenk E, Schleyer R, Jones CR, Fincham S, Daratha KB, Monsen KA. Time motion analysis of nursing work in ICU, telemetry and medical-surgical units. J Nurs Manag. 2017;25(8):640–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12502.
Yen P, Kellye M, Lopetegui M, Saha A, Loversidge J, Chipps EM, et al. Nurses’ time allocation and multitasking of nursing activities: a time motion study. AMIA Ann Symp Proc. 2018;2018:1137–6.
De Veer AJE, De Groot K, Brinkman M, Francke AL. Administratieve druk: méér dan kwestie van tijd. [Administratieve pressure: more than a matter of time]. Nivel: Utrecht; 2017.
Hagenaars LL, Van Hilten O, Klazinga NS, Jeurissen PPT. Track and trace of administrative costs in the Dutch long-term care system. J Long-Term Care. 2021;0(2021):318–28. https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.68.
Michel L, Waelli M, Allen D, Minvielle E. The content and meaning of administrative work: a qualitative study of nursing practices. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(9):2179–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13294.
OECD WHO. Paying for performance in health care: implications for health system performance and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press McGraw-Hill; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264224568-en.
Tyler DA, Parker VA, Engle RL, Brandeis GH, Hickey EC, Rosen AK, et al. An exploration of job design in long -term care facilities and its effect on nursing employee satisfaction. Health Care Manage Rev. 2006;31(2):137–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004010-200604000-00007.
De Veer AJE, Francke AL. Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(7):846–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.016.
American Nurses Association (ANA). Principles for nurse documentation: Guidance for registered nurses. Silver Spring: ANA; 2010. Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/~4af4f2/globalassets/docs/ana/ethics/principles-of-nursing-documentation.pdf.
Müller-Staub M, Abt J, Brenner A, Hofer B. Expert report on the responsibility of nursing. Swiss Association for Nursing Science: Bern; 2015.
V&VN [Dutch Nurses Association]. Richtlijn Verpleegkundige en Verzorgende Verslaglegging [Guideline nursing documentation]. To be published in 2022.
Baumann LA, Baker J, Elshaug AG. The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2018;122(8):827–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.014.
Moore EC, Tolley CL, Bates DW, Slight SP. A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses' time. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(5):798–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz231.
Vehko T, Hypponen H, Puttonen S, Kujala S, Ketola E, Tuukkanen J, et al. Experienced time pressure and stress: electronic health records usability and information technology compentence play a role. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0891-z.
Wisner K, Lyndon A, Chesla CA. The electronic health record's impact on nurses' cognitive work: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;94:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.03.003.
Müller-Staub M, De Graaf-Waar H, Paans W. An internationally consented standard for nursing process-clinical decision support Systems in Electronic Health Records. Comput Inform Nurs. 2016;34(11):493–502. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000277.
Alghamdi MG. Nursing workload: a concept analysis. J Nurs Manag. 2016;24(4):449–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12354.
Griffiths P, Saville D, Ball J, Jones J, Pattison N, Monks T, et al. Nursing workload, nurse staffing methodologies and tools: a systematic scoping review and discussion. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;103:103487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103487.
Hoogendoorn ME, Brinkman S, Spijkstra JJ, Bosman RJ, Margadant CC, Haringman J, et al. The objective nursing workload and perceived nursing workload in Intensive Care Units: Analysis of association. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;114(103852). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103852
Collins S, Couture B, Kan MJ, Dykes P, Schnock K, Knaplund C, et al. Quantifying and visualizing nursing flowsheet documentation burden in acute and critical care. AMIA Ann Symp Proc. 2018;2018:348–57.
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd e.d.). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications; 2018.
Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(9 Part 2):2134–56.
Hanson WE, Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, Petska KS, Creswell JD. Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;5(2):224–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224.
Tates K, Zwaanswijk M, Otten R, Van Dulmen S, Hoogerbrugge PM, Kamps WA, et al. Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: Examples from paediatric oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-15.
Zwaanswijk M, Van Dulmen S. Advantages of asynchronous online focus groups and face-to-face focus groups as perceived by child, adolescent and adult participants: A survey study. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(756). https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-756.
De Lange J, Deusing E, Van Asch IF, Peeters J, Zwaanswijk M, Pot AM, et al. Factors facilitating dementia case management: results of online focus groups. Dementia (London). 2018;17(1):110–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301216634959.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92–8. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074.
Fraczkowski D, Matson J, Dunn LK. Nurse workarounds in the electronic health record: an integrative review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(7):1149–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa050.
Moy AJ, Schwartz JM, Chen RJ, Sadri S, Lucas E, Cato KD, et al. Measurement of clinical documentation burden among physicians and nurses using electronic health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(5):98–1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa325.
Vishwanath A, Singh SR, Winkelstein P. The impact of electronic medical record systems on outpatient workflows: a longitudinal evaluation of its workflow effects. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(11):778–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.006.
Keenan G, Yakel E, Dunn Lopez K, Tschannen D, Ford YB. Challenges to nurses’ efforts of retrieving, documenting, and communicating patient care information. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(2):245–51. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000894.
Dunn Lopez K, Chin CL, Leitão Azevedo RF, Kaushik V, Roy B, Schuh W, et al. Electronic health record usability and workload changes over time for provider and nursing staff following transition to new EHR. Appl Ergon. 2021;93:103359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103359.
Lavin MA, Harper E, Barr N. Health information technology, patient safety, and professional nursing care documentation in acute care settings. Online J Issues Nurs. 2015;20(2).
Sockolow PS, Liao C, Chittams JL, Bowels KH. Evaluating the impact of electronic health records on nurse clinical process at two community health sites. Nurs Inform. 2012;2012(381).
Kieft RAMM, Vreeke EM, De Groot EM, Volkert PA, Francke AL, Delnoij DMJ. The development of a nursing subset of patient problems to support interoperability. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(158).