Nurse Practitioners do not reduce General Practitioners’ workload

Evidence-based Healthcare and Public Health - Tập 8 - Trang 335-338 - 2004
Brenda Leese1
1Reader in Primary Care Research, Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds UK.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Venning, 2000, Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care, BMJ, 320, 1048, 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1048 Shum, 2000, Nurse management of patients with minor illnesses in general practice, BMJ, 320, 1038, 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1038 Kinnersley, 2000, Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting ‘same day’ consultations in primary care, BMJ, 320, 1043, 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1043 Laurant, 2004, Impact of nurse practitioners on workload of general practitioners, BMJ, 328, 927, 10.1136/bmj.38041.493519.EE Atkin, 1993, A census of direction, Nursing Times, 89, 38 Jenkins-Clarke, 1998, Teams and seams, J Adv Nurs, 28, 1120, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00388.x Department of Health. The new GMS contract. Delivering benefits for GPs and their patients. The Stationery Office: London, 2003. Wilson, 2002, Barriers to developing the nurse practitioner role in primary care – the GP perspective, Fam Pract, 19, 641, 10.1093/fampra/19.6.641 Department of Health. Practitioners with special interests in primary care. Implementing schemes for nurses with special interests in primary care. The Stationery Office: London, 2003. Nocon, 2004, The role of UK general practitioners with special clinical interests, Br J Gen Pract, 54, 50 Department of Health. Liberating the Talents. The Stationery Office: London, 2002. Buchan, 2000, Nursing numbers in Britain, BMJ, 320, 1067, 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1067