Numerical simulation of landslide over erodible surface
Tóm tắt
Estimating the magnitude and intensity of landslides is a fundamental requirement in quantitatively evaluating the risks involved, and preparing a mitigation strategy. Though the physics-based dynamic model of landslide can predict the travel distance, kinematic velocity, and hazard zone, the effects of erosion and the excess pore water pressure during the dynamic process of landslide are often ignored. In order to study these factors, a physics-based dynamic model of landslide considering erosion and excess pore water pressure is presented in this paper. A high-precision numerical method based on the finite volume method is proposed to solve the model equations. Several numerical tests are performed to verify the numerical method and the model. The effects of erosion and excess pore water pressure on the dynamic process of landslide are also analyzed. The numerical results indicate that the scale and mobility of a landslide are influenced by the effect of erosion and excess pore water pressure. The excess pore water pressure can reduce the resistance to shear stress from the erodible bed and lead to a higher erosion amount and longer moving distance of the landslide. It also affects the degree of erosion and further affects the dynamic process of the landslide. The sensitivity analysis of the parameters that influence excess pore water pressure indicate that these parameters have a significant impact on the evolution of excess pore water pressure, and that the degree of saturation of bed sediment has the highest influence on excess pore water pressure.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agliardi F, Crosta GB, Frattini P (2009) Integrating rockfall risk assessment and countermeasure design by 3D modelling techniques. Natural Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:4
Brufau P, García-Navarro P, Vázquez-Cendón ME (2004) Zero mass error using unsteady wetting–drying conditions in shallow flows over dry irregular topography. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 45(10):1047–1082
Crosta GB, Imposimato S, Roddeman DG (2003) Numerical modelling of large landslides stability and run-out. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:523–538
Chen H, Lee CF (2000) Numerical simulation of debris flows. Can Geotech J 37:146–160
Cao Z, Pender G, Wallis S, Carling P (2004) Computational dam-break hydraulics over erodible sediment bed. J Hydraul Eng 130(7):689–703
De Blasio FV, Elverhøi A (2008) A model for frictional melt production beneath large rock avalanches. J Geophysical Res Earth Surface (2003–2012) 113:F2
Fennema RJ, Chaudhry MH (1990) Explicit methods for 2-D transient free-surface flows. J Hydraul Eng 116(8):1013–1034
Fraccarollo L, Capart H (2002) Riemann wave description of erosional dam-break flows. J Fluid Mech 461:183–228
Fraccarollo L, Capart H, Zech Y (2003) A Godunov method for the computation of erosional shallow water transients. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 41(9):951–976
Fayssal I, Moukalled F (2012) A New Numerical Approach for Predicting the Two-Phase Flow of Refrigerants during Evaporation and Condensation. Numerical Heat Transfer Part B Fundamentals 62(5):341–369
George DL, Iverson RM (2011) A two-phase debris-flow model that includes coupled evolution of volume fractions, granular dilatancy, and pore-fluid pressure. Italian J Eng Geol Environ 10:2011–03, In press, Doi
Gerolymos N, Gazetas G (2007) A model for grain-crushing-induced landslides—Application to Nikawa, Kobe 1995. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(9):803–817
Goren L, Aharonov E (2007) Long runout landslides: the role of frictional heating and hydraulic diffusivity. Geophys Res Lett 34:7
Goren L, Aharonov E (2009) On the stability of landslides: A thermo-poro-elastic approach. Earth Planet Sci Lett 277:365–372
Gottardi G, Venutelli M (2004) Central scheme for two-dimensional dam-break flow simulation. Adv Water Resour 27:259–268
Gray JMNT (1999) Gravity-driven free surface flow of granular avalanches over complex basal topography. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A:Math Physical Eng Sci 455(1985):1841–1874
Hungr O, Corominas J, Eberhardt E (2005) Estimating landslide motion mechanism, travel distance and velocity. Proc. Int. Conf. on Landslide Risk Management, Vancouver, Canada. - Balkema, Leiden, 99–128
Hutter K, Luca I (2012) Two-layer debris mixture flows on arbitrary terrain with mass exchange at the base and the interface. Contin Mech Thermodyn 24(4–6):525–555
Iwasaki K, Inutsuka S (2011) Smoothed particle magnetohydrodynamics with a Riemann solver and the method of characteristics. Mon Not R Astron Soc 418(3):1668–1688
Iverson RM (2009) Elements of an Improved Model of Debris-flow Motion. Powders and Grains, Proc. 6 Intl. Conf. on Micromechanics of Granular Media, edited by M. Nakagawa and S. Luding Am Inst Physics Proc 1145(1):9–16
Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J Geophysic Res Solid Earth (1978–2012) 106(B1):537–552
Iverson RM (2012) Elementary theory of bed-sediment entrainment by debris flows and avalanches. J Geophysic Res Earth Surface (2003–2012) 117:F3
Iverson RM, Reid ME, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Godt JW, Griswold JP (2011) Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment. Nat Geosci 4:116–121
Iverson RM, Ouyang C (2014) Bed-sediment entrainment by rapidly evolving flows at Earth’s surface: Review and reformulation of depth-integrated theory. Rev. Geophys.
Jha AK, Akiyama J, Ura M (1995) First- and Second-order flux difference splitting schemes for dam-break problem. Am Society of Civil Eng J Hydraulic Eng 121(12):877–884
Katopodes N, Strelko T (1978) Computing two-dimensional dam-break flood waves. J Hydraul Div 104(9):1269–1288
Liang DF, Falconer RA, Lin B (2006) Comparison between TVD-MacCormack and ADI-type solvers of the shallow water equations. Adv Water Resour 29(12):1833–1845
Luna BQ, Remaitre A (2012) Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run-out model incorporating entrainment. Eng Geol 128:63–75
McDougall S, Hungr O (2005) Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides. Can Geotech J 42(5):1437–1448
McDougall S, Hungr O (2004) A model for the analysis of rapid landslide motion across three dimensional terrain. Can Geotech J 41:1084–1097
Ouyang C, He S, Xu Q, Luo Y, Zhang W (2013) A MacCormack-TVD finite difference method to simulate the mass flow in mountainous terrain with variable computational domain. Comput Geosci 52:1–10
Ouyang C, He S, Xu Q (2014) MacCormack-TVD Finite Difference Solution for Dam Break Hydraulics over Erodible Sediment Beds. J Hydraulic Eng. 141(5):06014026
Pudasaini SP, Hutter K (2007) Avalanche Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Pudasaini SP, Eckart W, Hutter K (2003) Gravity-driven rapid shear flows of dry granular masses in helically curved and twisted channels. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 13(7):1019–1052
Pitman EB, Nichita CC, Patra A, Bauer A, Sheridan M, Bursik M (2003) Computing granular avalanches and landslides. Phys Fluids 15(12):3638–3646
Pitman EB, Le L (2005) A two-fluid model for avalanche and debris flows. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 363(1832):1573–1601
Sassa K (1985) The mechanism of debris flows. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco. International Society of. Soil Mech Foundation Eng 1:1173–1176
Sassa K (1989) Geotechnical model for the motion of landslides. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts. Elsevier Sci 26(2):88-88
Savage SB, Hutter K (1989) The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. J Fluid Mech 199:177–215
Savage SB, Iverson RM (2003) Surge dynamics coupled to pore-pressure evolution in debris flows. Debris-flow Hazards Mitigation Mech Prediction Assess 1:503–514
Toro EF (2009) Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics: a practical introduction. Springer Science & Business Media.
Vardoulakis I (2000) Catastrophic landslides due to frictional heating of the failure plane. Mech Cohesive-frictional Materials 5(6):443–467
VanDine DF, Bovis M (2002) History and goals of Canadian debris flow research, a review. Nat Hazards 26(1):67–80
Wang FW, Sassa K (2010) Landslide simulation by a geotechnical model combined with a model for apparent friction change. Phys Chem Earth 35:149–161
Zoppou C, Roberts S (2000) Numerical solution of the two-dimensional unsteady dam break. Appl Math Model 24(7):457–475