Numerical investigation of Savonius wind turbine farms

Belkacem Belabes1,2,3, Abdelkader Youcefi3, Marius Paraschivoiu2
1Centre de Développement des Energies Renouvelables 2 , CDER, BP 62 Route de l'Observatoire, Bouzaréah, 16340 Algiers, Algeria
2Concordia University 3 , Montréal, Québec H3G1M8, Canada
3Laboratoire de Mécanique Appliquée 1 Faculté de Génie Mécanique, , USTO-MB, 1505 El M'noaur, Oran, Algeria

Tóm tắt

The Savonius vertical axis wind turbine is a simple device, easy to manufacture, has good starting characteristics, and rotates with wind from any direction; nevertheless, it has a lower efficiency than the other wind turbines. The aim of this paper is to numerically explore the non-linear unsteady flow over a conventional Savonius using three dimensional computations with emphasis on the placement of these turbines in a linear array and the effect of an obstacle that acts as a wind deflector. First, an infinite array of turbines is used to study the gap distance between the wind turbine axis rotors. This investigation is conducted via numerical simulations based on the computational fluid dynamics computer program Fluent 14.5. It is found that a gap distance L = 1.4R gives a very good performance. Second, four farms with different number of turbines—from 3 to 21 turbines—are studied. The effect on the power coefficient of the number of turbines in each farm is reported and analyzed. Third, a new arrangement that includes an obstacle at one end of the array of turbines is presented. The best configuration explored in this work increases the power coefficient of each Savonius wind turbine by 82% compared to a single turbine. Finally, the effect of the wind direction for the best configuration is presented and the range of wind angles for which the farm outperforms isolated turbines is calculated.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1931, Mech. Eng., 53, 333

1989, J. Sol. Energy Eng., 111, 71, 10.1115/1.3268289

2016, Renewable Energy, 86, 89, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.102

2015, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 139, 8, 10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.003

2016, Renewable Energy, 87, 332, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.015

2013, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 116, 32, 10.1016/j.jweia.2012.11.001

2016, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 156, 1, 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.06.007

2016, Renewable Energy, 89, 231, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.012

2010, Renewable Energy, 35, 2618, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.04.007

2012, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 4, 053107, 10.1063/1.4754438

2015, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 137, 78, 10.1016/j.jweia.2014.12.002

2015, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 7, 013135, 10.1063/1.4906978

2013, Renewable Energy, 60, 578, 10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.009

2014, Renewable Energy, 69, 174, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.038

2010, Renewable Energy, 35, 821, 10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.025

2015, Renewable Energy, 79, 167, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.035

1988, Wind Eng., 12, 59

2005, JSME Int. J. Ser. B Fluids Therm. Eng., 48, 9, 10.1299/jsmeb.48.9

2009, Renewable Energy, 34, 521, 10.1016/j.renene.2008.06.002

1977, Wind Tunnel Performance Data for Two-and Three-Bucket Savonius Rotors

2004

2004, Renewable Energy, 29, 1843, 10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.011

2008

1986, Bull. JSME, 29, 2115, 10.1299/jsme1958.29.2115

2011, Energy Convers. Manage., 52, 236, 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.070