Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty

Gender and Society - Tập 24 Số 5 - Trang 616-646 - 2010
Stephen Benard1, Shelley J. Correll2
1Indiana University,
2Stanford University

Tóm tắt

This research proposes and tests a new theoretical mechanism to account for a portion of the motherhood penalty in wages and related labor market outcomes. At least a portion of this penalty is attributable to discrimination based on the assumption that mothers are less competent and committed than other types of workers. But what happens when mothers definitively prove their competence and commitment? In this study, we examine whether mothers face discrimination in labor-market-type evaluations even when they provide indisputable evidence that they are competent and committed to paid work. We test the hypothesis that evaluators discriminate against highly successful mothers by viewing them as less warm, less likable, and more interpersonally hostile than otherwise similar workers who are not mothers. The results support this “normative discrimination” hypothesis for female but not male evaluators. The findings have important implications for understanding the nature and persistence of discrimination toward mothers.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/089124390004002002

10.1177/001979390305600204

10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768

Benard, Stephen, 2008, Hastings Law Journal, 59, 101

10.2307/2093465

10.3386/w9873

Blair-Loy, Mary., 2003, Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives

10.2307/2096302

10.1177/089124300014003004

10.2307/2657415

10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665

10.1177/0003122410365307

10.2466/pr0.1987.61.2.565

10.1177/0002716204268776

Coltrane, Scott, 2008, Gender and families

Connell, Robert W., 1995, Masculinities

10.1086/511799

Correll, Shelley J., 2003, Expectation states theory

10.1177/002188639002600104

Crittenden, Ann., 2001, The price of motherhood: Why the most important job in the world is still the least valued

10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x

10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

10.2307/2095848

10.1023/A:1018850404838

10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00383.x

10.1177/0730888404266364

10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00423.x

10.1002/job.4030140704

Harkness, Susan, 1999, The family gap in pay: Evidence from seven industrialised countries. CASE paper 29

Hays, Sharon., 1996, The cultural contradictions of motherhood

10.1111/0022-4537.00234

10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416

Hochschild, Arlie., 1989, The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. Reissue ed

Kanter, Rosabeth Moss., 1977, Men and women of the corporation

Kimmel, Michael., 1994, Masculinity as homophobia

Kimmel, Michael., 2004, The gendered society, 2

10.5465/amr.1992.4279534

Long, J. Scott., 1997, Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables

10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb02362.x

10.1177/0730888404263908

Misra, Joya, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association

Moss-Racusin, Corinne A., 2009, Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 141

10.1016/0749-5978(88)90025-8

10.1177/0146167207310027

10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00382.x

Pierce, Jennifer L., 1995, Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms

10.2307/2095043

10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629

10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199601)17:1<33::AID-JOB778>3.0.CO;2-F

Sigle-Rushton, Wendy, Paper presented at the conference on Cross-National Comparisons of Expenditures on Children

10.1525/9780520941793

Townsend, Nicholas W., 2002, The package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men’s lives

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey., 2008, Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

10.2307/2657300

10.1257/jep.12.1.137

10.1023/A:1024600323316

Williams, Joan C., 2000, Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it

Williams, Joan C., 2006, Opt out or pushed out? How the press covers work-family conflict