Normality in medicine: an empirical elucidation
Tóm tắt
Normality is both a descriptive and a normative concept. Undoubtedly, the normal often operates normatively as an exclusionary tool of cultural authority. While it has prominently found its way into the field of medicine, it remains rather unclear in what sense it is used. Thus, our study sought to elucidate people’s understanding of normality in medicine and to identify concepts that are linked to it. Using convenient sampling, we carried out a cross-sectional survey. Since the survey was advertised through social media, we employed an online survey. We performed descriptive and inferential analyses. Predictors were chosen in a theory-driven manner. In total, 323 persons from 21 countries completed the survey. Analysis revealed that the overall acceptance of normality in medicine was associated with notions of injustice, authority, discrimination, and with having a medical profession. More precisely, for the field of mental health, injustice insensitivity, genderism and transphobia, and authority were positively associated with a person’s acceptance of normality; and, for the field of physical health, injustice insensitivity and having a medical profession were positively associated with a person’s acceptance of normality. Finally, participants’ acceptance of the use of normality in the area of mental health was lower than in the area of physical health. What is considered normal has implications for clinical practice, both at an individual and at a policy-level. Acknowledging its normalistic condition, the discipline of medicine has to confront itself with its own contribution to the augmentation of social inequalities through the excessive reliance on the concept of normality. Research that centers the lived experiences of those who are being systematically marginalized because they are deemed abnormal is needed. By empirically elucidating the conceptual relationships between normality in medicine and other variables, we provide points of leverage to deprive normality of its normative power. For medicine, this is needed to first do no harm.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Stephens E. #notnormal. Cult Stud Rev. 2019;25:278–80.
Cryle P, Stephens E. Normality - A Critical Genealogy. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 2017.
Bear A, Knobe J. Normality: Part descriptive, part prescriptive. Cognition. 2017;167:25–37.
Wysocki T. Normality: a Two-Faced Concept. Rev Philos Psychol. 2020;11(4):689–716.
Eysenck HJ. Uses and abuses of psychology. Middlesex: Penguin; 1953.
Canguilhem G. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books; 1991.
Rost M. “To Normalize is to Impose a Requirement on an Existence.” Why Health Professionals Should Think Twice Before Using the Term “Normal” With Patients. Bioethical Inquiry. 2021;18:389–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10122-2.
Catita M, Águas A, Morgado P. Normality in medicine: a critical review. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2020;15(1):3.
Wellman M. The concept of normal in medicine. Can Med Assoc J. 1958;79(1):43–4.
Thomson RG. Extraordinary Bodies - Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press; 1997.
Liebelt C. Reshaping ‘Turkish’ Breasts and Noses: On Cosmetic Surgery, Gendered Norms and the ‘Right to Look Normal’. In: Liebelt C, Böllinger S, Vierke U. (eds) Beauty and the Norm. Palgrave Studies in Globalization and Embodiment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91174-8_7.
Kittay E. “Thoughts on the Desire for Normality,” Surgically Shaping Children: Technology, Ethics, and the Pursuit of Normality, ed. Erik Parens. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2006.
Butt L. Measurements, Morality, and the Politics of “Normal” Infant Growth. Journal of Medical Humanities. 1999;20(2):81–100.
Davis LJ. Enforcing normalcy : disability, deafness, and the body. London: Verso; 1995.
Armstrong T. The myth of the normal brain: embracing neurodiversity. AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(4):348–52.
Freedman JE, Honkasilta JM. Dictating the boundaries of ab/normality: a critical discourse analysis of the diagnostic criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder. Disabil Soc. 2017;32(4):565–88.
Mason PH. What Is Normal? A Historical Survey and Neuroanthropological Perspective. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of Neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands; 2015. p. 343–63.
Carter JB. Heart of Whiteness: Normal Sexuality and Race in America, 1880-1940. Durham: Duke University Press; 2007. ISBN 978-0-8223-3948-9.
Reis E. Bodies in Doubt: an American History of Intersex. Johns Hopkins pbk. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2012.
Benincasa L. Teaching lessons in exclusion: researchers’ assumptions and the ideology of normality. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2012;25(8):1087–106.
Harris A, Karimshah A. Young Muslims, Stigma and the Work of Normality. Sociology. 2018;53(4):617–33.
Canetto SS. What is a normal family? Common assumptions and current evidence. J Primary Prevent. 1996;17(1):31–46.
Cretton V. Performing whiteness: racism, skin colour, and identity in Western Switzerland. Ethn Racial Stud. 2018;41(5):842–59.
Müller UA. Far Away So Close: Race, Whiteness, and German Identity. Identities. 2011;18(6):620–45.
Evers D. Neurodiversity, Normality, and Theological Anthropology. Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences. 2017;4(2):160–84.
Against AR, Function N. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2000;31:33–53.
Chadwick R. Normality as Convention and as Scientific Fact. In: Schramme T, Edwards S, editors. Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands; 2017. p. 17–28.
Bruckmüller S. Singled Out as the Effect to be Explained: Implications for Collective Self-Esteem. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013;39(2):237–49.
Bruckmüller S, Hegarty P, Abele AE. Framing gender differences: Linguistic normativity affects perceptions of power and gender stereotypes. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2012;42(2):210–8.
Hacking I. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
De Clercq E, Starke G, Rost M. “Waking up” the sleeping metaphor of normality in connection to intersex or DSD: a scoping review of medical literature. Hist Phil Life Sci. 2022;44(4):50.
United Nations Development Programme - Human Development Reports. Human Development Index (HDI) 2020 [Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi.
Cheuvront JP. Life-Long Coupled Relationships and Psychoanalysis: Reconsidering Developmental Milestones and Measures of Normality in Clinical Theory. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology. 2009;5(1):37–58.
Zentralarchiv für empirische Sozialforschung (ZA) & Zentrum für Umfragen MuAZeV. Religiosity scale. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS) 2014 [Available from: https://zis.gesis.org/skala/ZA-ZUMA-Religiosit%C3%A4tsskala.
Link J. Versuch über den Normalismus. Wie Normalität produziert wird. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag; 2009.
Link J. Normale Krisen? Normalismus und die Krise der Gegenwart. Konstanz: University Press; 2013.
Breyer B. Left-Right Self-Placement (ALLBUS). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). 2015. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis83.
Rammstedt B, John OP. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J Res Pers. 2007;41(1):203–12.
Eidelman S, Crandall CS. Bias in Favor of the Status Quo. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2012;6(3):270–81.
Jäger F. A Social Psychological Concept of Normality - An examination oftheemergence, perpetuationand shift of unnoticed standards, and their influence on behaviorand social dynamics. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller University Jena; 2018.
Sibley CG, Duckitt J. Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008;12(3):248–79.
Rosenberg M. Self-Esteem Scale. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). 2002. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis46.
Herman JL, Stevens MJ, Bird A, Mendenhall M, Oddou G. The Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale: Towards a more refined measure for international management research. Int J Intercult Relat. 2010;34(1):58–65.
Reno RR, Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA. The transsituational influence of social norms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64(1):104–12.
Smith JR, Hogg MA, Martin R, Terry DJ. Uncertainty and the influence of group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship. Br J Soc Psychol. 2007;46(4):769–92.
Zhang H, Hook JN, Johnson KA. Moral Foundations Questionnaire. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK, editors. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 1–3.
Beierlein C, Baumert A, Schmitt M, Kemper CJ, Kovaleva A, Rammstedt B. Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität-Skalen-8 (USS-8). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). 2014. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis36.
Tebbe EA, Moradi B, Ege E. Revised and abbreviated forms of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale: Tools for assessing anti-trans* prejudice. J Couns Psychol. 2014;61(4):581–92.
Schilt K, Westbrook L. Doing Gender, Doing Heteronormativity: “Gender Normals”, Transgender People, and the Social Maintenance of Heterosexuality. Gend Soc. 2009;23(4):440–64.
United Nations Human Rights. Combatting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity - Fact Sheets 2020 [Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Discrimination/Pages/LGBTFactSheets.aspx.
White Hughto JM, Reisner SL, Pachankis JE. Transgender stigma and health: A critical review of stigma determinants, mechanisms, and interventions. Soc Sci Med. 1982;2015(147):222–31.
Hooker SA. SF-36. In: Gellman MD, Turner JR, editors. Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine. New York: Springer New York; 2013. pp. 1784–1786.
Stefanek E, Strohmeier D, Fandrem H, Spiel C. Depressive symptoms in native and immigrant adolescents: the role of critical life events and daily hassles. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012;25(2):201–17.
Harrell FE. Regression Modeling Strategies. 2nd ed. Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer; 2015.
Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek BA. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;96(5):1029–46.
Haidt J. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books; 2012.
Graham J, Haidt J, Koleva S, Motyl M, Iyer R, Wojcik SP, Ditto PH. Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;47:55–130.
Kapp SK, Gillespie-Lynch K, Sherman LE, Hutman T. Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity Developmental psychology. 2013;49(1):59–71.
Robertson SM. Neurodiversity, Quality of Life, and Autistic Adults: Shifting Research and Professional Focuses onto Real-Life Challenges. Disabil Stud Q. 2009;30.
Nicolaidis C. What can physicians learn from the neurodiversity movement? Virtual Mentor. 2012;14(6):503–10.
Nicpon MF, Allmon A, Sieck B, Stinson RD. Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going? Gifted Child Quarterly. 2011;55(1):3–17.
Budding D, Chidekel D. ADHD and giftedness: A neurocognitive consideration of twice exceptionality. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2012;1(2):145–51.
Holland K. Lay theories and criticisms of mental health news: elaborating the concept of biocommunicability. Disabil Soc. 2018;33(8):1327–48.
Miranda F. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press. 2007.
Link BG, Phelan J. Stigma power. Soc Sci Med. 1982;2014(103):24–32.
Phelan JC, Link BG, Dovidio JF. Stigma and prejudice: one animal or two? Social science & medicine (1982). 2008;67(3):358–67.
Knaak S, Mantler E, Szeto A. Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare: Barriers to access and care and evidence-based solutions. Healthc Manage Forum. 2017;30(2):111–6.
Avasthi A, Sarkar S, Grover S. Approaches to psychiatric nosology: A viewpoint. Indian journal of psychiatry. 2014;56(3):301–4.
Manrai AK, Patel CJ, Ioannidis JPA. In the Era of Precision Medicine and Big Data, Who Is Normal? JAMA. 2018;319(19):1981–2.
Hellman D. Discrimination, Concept of. In: Chadwick R, editor. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. p. 833–41.
Thomson G. Needs and Justice. In: Chadwick R, editor. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. p. 208–15.
Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and brain sciences. 2010;33(2–3):61–83 discussion -135.
World Health Organization. Vision Statement by WHO Director-General 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/vision.
Shklar JN. The faces of injustice. Yale University Press. 1990.