Nomenclatural considerations in naming species of Aspergillus and its teleomorphs

Cline, 2005, Implications of changes to Article 59 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature enacted at the Vienna Congress, 2005, Inoculum, 56, 3 Gams, 2003, Mycotaxon, 88, 493 Gams, 2005, Towards a single scientific name for species of fungi: a rebuttal, Inoculum, 56, 1 1994, Regnum Vegetabile, 131, 1 1988, Regnum Vegetabile, 118, 1 Hawksworth, 1988, Improved stability for biological nomenclature, Nature, 334, 301, 10.1038/334301a0 Hawksworth, 1992, The need for a more effective biological nomenclature for the 21st century, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 109, 543, 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1992.tb01450.x Hawksworth, 1993, Protected names in current use - a benefit or a threat to the taxonomist?, Cryptogamie Mycologie, 14, 149 Hawksworth, 2004, Limitation of dual nomenclature for pleomorphic fungi, Taxon, 53, 596, 10.2307/4135654 Kozakiewicz, 1992, Proposals for nomina specifica conservanda and rejicienda in Aspergillus and Penicillium (Fungi), Taxon, 41, 109, 10.2307/1222500 Peterson, 2000, Phylogenetic relationships in Aspergillus based on rDNA sequence analysis, 323 Pitt, 1979 Pitt, 1997 Pitt JI, Samson RA (1993). Species names in current use in the Trichocomaceae (Fungi, Eurotiales). In: Names in current use in the families Trichocomaceae, Cladoniaceae, Pinaceae, and Lemnaceae. (Greuter W, ed.) Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books: 13-57 (Regnum Vegetabile 128 :13-57). Raper, 1949 Rossman, 2005, Towards a single scientific name for species of fungi, Inoculum, 56, 1 Samson, 2004 Samson, 2007, The species concept in Aspergillus: recommendation of an international panel, Studies in Mycology, 59, 71, 10.3114/sim.2007.59.09 Thom, 1930 Hawksworth, 1991, Lists of Names in Current Use - a new initiative to address a continuing problem, Mycotaxon, 40, 445 1991