No reproductive character displacement in male advertisement signals of Hyla japonica in relation to the sympatric H. suweonensis
Tóm tắt
Reproductive interaction between closely related taxa may leave a distinctive signature in which populations of interacting taxa are more dissimilar in sympatry than in allopatry. An ideal condition for such a pattern of reproductive character displacement (RCD) may occur when a population has limited gene flow and experiences strong selection pressure, exerted by an interacting taxon in areas of sympatry. In Korea, there are two closely related treefrog species: Hyla japonica, which is distributed widely throughout the country, and Hyla suweonensis, which occurs sympatrically in a narrow strip of western coastal plains. H. suweonensis is only found within the distribution of H. japonica. These two species have a similar single-note call structure. Here, we tested the possibility of RCD in H. japonica by examining geographic variation in advertisement calls. Although means of temporal and spectral characters were significantly different between the two species, sympatric populations of H. japonica and H. suweonensis overlapped in distributions of most characters. Furthermore, allopatric and sympatric H. japonica populations did not differ in all call characters. Weak genetic differentiation between sympatric and allopatric populations of H. japonica implied either substantial gene flow or recent genetic isolation. Possible explanations for no RCD in male advertisement calls of H. japonica include a difference in fine temporal characteristics between the two species, migration between sympatric and allopatric localities in H. japonica, RCD in female preferences in H. japonica, and weak selection pressure by H. suweonensis.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersen LW, Fog K, Damgaard C (2004) Habitat fragmentation causes bottlenecks and inbreeding in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1293–1302
Angelone S, Holderegger R (2009) Population genetics suggests effectiveness of habitat connectivity measures for the European tree frog in Switzerland. J Appl Ecol 46:879–887
Arens P, Sluis T, van't Westende WC, Vosman B, Vos CC, Smulders MJM (2007) Genetic population differentiation and connectivity among fragmented Moor frog (Rana arvalis) populations in The Netherlands. Landsc Ecol 22:1489–1500
Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48
Blair WF (1955) Mating call and stage of speciation in the Microhyla olivacea-M. Carolinensis complex. Evolution 9:469–480
Blair WF (1974) Character displacement in frogs. Am Zool 14:1119–1125
Brown WL, Wilson EO (1956) Character displacement. Syst Zool 5:49–64
Carson HL, Lande R (1984) Inheritance of a secondary sexual character in Drosophila silvestris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:6904–6907
Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland
Crawford NG (2010) SMOGD: software for the measurement of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol Resour 10:556–557
Crispo E, Bentzen P, Reznick DN, Kinnison MT, Hendry AP (2006) The relative influence of natural selection and geography on gene flow in guppies. Mol Ecol 15:49–62
Crossley SA (1974) Changes in mating behavior produced by selection for ethological isolation between ebony and vestigial mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 28:631–647
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London
Dobzhansky T (1940) Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am Nat 74:312–321
Eberhard WG (1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Freeland JR, Kirk H, Petersen SD (2011) Molecular ecology, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Gabor CR, Ryan MJ (2001) Geographical variation in reproductive character displacement in mate choice by male sailfin mollies. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1063–1070
Gerhardt HC (1994) Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim Behav 47:959–969
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gockel J, Kennington WJ, Hoffmann A, Goldstein DB, Partridge L (2001) Nonclinality of molecular variation implicates selection in maintaining a morphological cline of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158:319–323
Gonser RA, Collura RV (1996) Waste not, want not: toe-clips as a source of DNA. J Herpetol 30:445–447
Grant PR (1972) Convergent and divergent character displacement. Biol J Linn Soc 4:39–68
Grobler JP, Mafumo HB, Minter LR (2003) Genetic differentiation among five populations of the South African ghost frog, Heleophryne natalensis. Biochem Syst Ecol 31:1023–1032
Gwynne DT, Morris GK (1986) Heterospecific recognition and behavioral isolation in acoustic Orthoptera (Insecta). Evol Theor 8:33–38
Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14812–14817
Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633–1638
Higashi M, Takimoto G, Yamamura N (1999) Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402:523–526
Höbel G, Gerhardt HC (2003) Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution 57:894–904
Hopkins R, Levin DA, Rausher MD (2012) Molecular signatures of selection on reproductive character displacement of flower color in Phlox drummondii. Evolution 66:469–485
Howard DS (1993) Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Harrison RG (ed) Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 46–69
Jang Y, Gerhardt HC (2006) Divergence in female calling song discrimination between sympatric and allopatric populations of the southern wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:150–158
Jang Y, Bockhorst A, Gerhardt HC (2007) Reproductive isolation in the wood cricket Gryllus vernalis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ethology 113:87–96
Jang Y, Won Y-J, Choe J (2009) Convergent and divergent patterns of morphological differentiation provide more evidence for reproductive character displacement in a wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). BMC Evol Biol 9:27
Jang Y, Hahm EH, Lee H-J, Park S, Won Y-J, Choe JC (2011) Geographic variation in advertisement calls in a tree frog species: gene flow and selection hypotheses. PLoS One 6:e23297
Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026
Keller SR, Sowell DR, Neiman M, Wolfe LM, Taylor DR (2009) Adaptation and colonization history affect the evolution of clines in two introduced species. New Phytol 183:678–690
Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12
Kirkpatrick M, Ravigné V (2002) Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am Nat 159:S22–S35
Kuramoto M (1980) Mating calls of treefrogs (genus Hyla) in the Far East, with description of a new species from Korea. Copeia 1980:100–108
Kuramoto M (1984) Systematic implications of hybridization experiments with some Eurasian treefrogs (Genus Hyla). Copeia 1984:609–616
Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725
Lemmon EM (2009) Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution 63:1155–1170
Lemmon AR, Smadja C, Kirkpatrick M (2004) Reproductive character displacement is not the only possible outcome of reinforcement. J Evol Biol 17:177–183
Lenormand T (2002) Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 17:183–189
Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452
Marquez R, Bosch J (1997) Male advertisement call and female preference in sympatric and allopatric midwife toads. Anim Behav 54:1333–1345
Marshall JL, Arnold ML, Howard DJ (2002) Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol Evol 17:558–563
McLister JD, Stevens ED, Bogart JP (1995) Comparative contractile dynamics of calling and locomotor muscles in three hylid frogs. J Exp Biol 198:1527–1538
Mendelson TC, Shaw KL (2005) Sexual behaviour: rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433:375–376
Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323
Nei M, Chesser RK (1983) Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann Hum Genet 47:253–259
Noor MA (1995) Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674–675
Noor MAF (1999) Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503–508
Park S (2011) Reproductive isolation based on call characters in two tree frog species in Korea. Ms. Thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul
Park S-R, Cheon S-M, Yang S-Y (1996) The classification of call types in genus Hyla in habitats around South Korea. Korean J Zool 39:207–214
Pfennig KS (2000) Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav Ecol 11:220–227
Pfennig KS, Pfennig DW (2009) Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Q Rev Biol 84:253–276
Räsänen K, Hendry AP (2008) Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Biol Lett 11:624–636
Rice AM, Pfennig DW (2010) Does character displacement initiate speciation? Evidence of reduced gene flow between populations experiencing divergent selection. J Evol Biol 23:854–865
Sætre GP, Moum T, Bures S, Král M, Adamjan M, Moreno J (1997) A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589–592
Servedio MR, Noor MAF (2003) The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:339–364
Tajima F (1989) Statistical methods to test for nucleotide mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739
van Doorn GS, Luttikhuizen PC, Weissing FJ (2001) Sexual selection at the protein level drives the extraordinary divergence of sex-related genes during sympatric speciation. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2155–2161
Waage JK (1979) Reproductive character displacement in Calopteryx (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Evolution 33:104–116
Wasserman M, Koepfer HR (1977) Character displacement for seuxal isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 31:812–823
Wilson AB, Noack-Kunnmann K, Meyer A (2000) Incipient speciation in sympatric Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fishes: sexual selection versus ecological diversification. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2133–2141
Yang S-Y (2000) Monograph of Korean Amphibia. Academy Book, Seoul
Yang S-Y, Min M-S (1997) Intra and interspecific diversity and speciation of two tree frogs in the genus Hyla. Korean J Genet 19:71–87
Yang S-Y, Park B-S (1988) Speciation of the two species of the genus Hyla (Anura) in Korea. Korean J Zool 31:11–20
Yoo E, Jang Y (2012) Abiotic effects on calling phenology of three frog species in Korea. Anim Cell Syst 16:260–267