Next generation DES simulation: A research agenda for human centric manufacturing systems

Journal of Industrial Information Integration - Tập 28 - Trang 100354 - 2022
Chris J Turner1, Wolfgang Garn1
1Surrey Business School at the University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU30 7GW, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fishman, 2013 Research Council of the Plattform Industrie 4, 2019. Key themes of Industrie 4.0. Research and development needs for successful implementation of Industrie 4.0 Research Council of the Plattform Industrie 4.0. Available at: https://en.acatech.de/publication/key-themes-of-industrie-4-0/download-pdf?lang=en (Accessed 22nd February 2021). Maier, J., "Made smarter review", 2017, [online] Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/655570/20171027_MadeSmarter_FINAL_DIGITAL.pdf. Industrial Internet Consortium (2021) Introduction, Available at: http://www.iiconsortium.org/about-us.htm (Accessed 22nd February 2021). M. Breque, L. De Nul, and A. Petridis, “Industry 5.0. towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient european industry”. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021. Ding, 2019, Defining a Digital Twin-based Cyber-Physical Production System for autonomous manufacturing in smart shop floors, Int. J. Prod. Res., 57, 6315, 10.1080/00207543.2019.1566661 AMRC, 2020. Untangling the requirements of a Digital Twin, Available at: https://www.amrc.co.uk/files/document/404/1604658922_AMRC_Digital_Twin_AW.pdf, Accessed on 16/04/2021. Nance, 1996, A history of discrete event simulation programming languages, 369 Swain, 2019, 2019 Simulation Software Survey, OR/MS Today Bijl, 2011, Advanced 3D visualization for simulation using game technology, 2810 Gubbi, 2013, Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 29, 1645, 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 Turner, 2021, Human in the Loop: industry 4.0 technologies and scenarios for worker mediation of automated manufacturing, IEEE Access, 9, 103950, 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3099311 Syafrudin, 2018, Performance analysis of IoT-based sensor, big data processing, and machine learning model for real-time monitoring system in automotive manufacturing, Sensors, 18, 2946, 10.3390/s18092946 Turner, 2020, Utilizing Industry 4.0 on the construction site: challenges and opportunities, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 17, 746, 10.1109/TII.2020.3002197 Zhong, 2017, Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review, Engineering, 3, 616, 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015 Wang, 2010, Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 77, 803, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.006 Chen, 2018, Edge computing in IoT-based manufacturing, IEEE Commun. Mag., 56, 103, 10.1109/MCOM.2018.1701231 Sun, 2019, AI-enhanced offloading in edge computing: when machine learning meets industrial IoT, IEEE Netw., 33, 68, 10.1109/MNET.001.1800510 Patel, 2017, On using the intelligent edge for IoT analytics, IEEE Intell. Syst., 32, 64, 10.1109/MIS.2017.3711653 Cheng, 2018, Industrial IoT in 5G environment towards smart manufacturing, J. Industr. Inf. Integr., 10, 10 Zhao, 2020, Presents the technology, protocols, and new innovations in industrial internet of things (IIoT), 39 Ye, 2018, An AutomationML/OPC UA-based Industry 4.0 solution for a manufacturing system, 1, 543 Profanter, 2019, OPC UA versus ROS, DDS, and MQTT: performance evaluation of industry 4.0 protocols, 955 Liu, 2019, A cyber-physical machine tools platform using OPC UA and MTConnect, J. Manuf. Syst., 51, 61, 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.04.006 Krasniqi, 2016, Use of IoT technology to drive the automotive industry from connected to full autonomous vehicles, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49, 269, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.078 Hoffmann, 2016, Semantic integration of multi-agent systems using an OPC UA information modeling approach, 744 Onggo, B.S., Proudlove, N.C., D'Ambrogio, S.A., Calabrese, A., Bisogno, S. and Ghiron, N.L., 2017. A BPMN extension to support discrete-event simulation for healthcare applications: an explicit representation of queues, attributes and data-driven decision points. J. Oper. Res. Soc., pp. 1–15. Ghosh, 2021, Developing sensor signal-based digital twins for intelligent machine tools, J. Industr. Inf. Integr., 24 Glaessgen, E. and Stargel, D., 2012, April. The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA (p. 1818). Boschert, 2016, Digital twin-the simulation aspect, 59 Yang, 2020, A multi-platform virtual practice for education in chemical engineering, 263 Rodič, 2017, Industry 4.0 and the new simulation modelling paradigm, Organizacija, 50, 10.1515/orga-2017-0017 Vieira, 2018, Setting an industry 4.0 research and development agenda for simulation-a literature review, Int. J. Simul. Model, 17, 377, 10.2507/IJSIMM17(3)429 Kritzinger, 2018, Digital Twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51, 1016, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 Lee, 2015, A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems, Manuf. Lett., 3, 18, 10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 Turner, 2019, Intelligent decision support for maintenance: an overview and future trends, Int. J. Computer Integr. Manuf., 32, 936, 10.1080/0951192X.2019.1667033 Turner, 2020, Intelligent decision support for maintenance: a new role for audit trails, 396 Ruppert, 2020, Integration of real-time locating systems into digital twins, J. Industr. Inf. Integr., 20 Kosacka-Olejnik, 2021, How Digital Twin Concept Supports Internal Transport Systems?—Literature Review, Energies, 14, 4919, 10.3390/en14164919 Liu, 2019, Digital twin-driven rapid individualised designing of automated flow-shop manufacturing system, Int. J. Prod. Res., 57, 3903, 10.1080/00207543.2018.1471243 Kousi, 2019, Digital twin for adaptation of robots’ behavior in flexible robotic assembly lines, Procedia Manuf., 28, 121, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.020 Lu, 2020, Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: connotation, reference model, applications and research issues, Robot Comput. Integr. Manuf., 61, 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837 Zhang, 2019, Digital twin-driven cyber-physical production system towards smart shop-floor, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 10, 4439, 10.1007/s12652-018-1125-4 Russell, 2010, B978 Haugeland, 1989 Kurzweil, 1990, 580 Salin, 1992, Machine learning and artificial intelligence: an introduction, Anal. Chem. (Washington, DC), 64, 49A, 10.1021/ac00025a742 Poole, D., Mackworth, A. and Goebel, R. "Computational Intelligence: a Logical Approach,", 1998. Zhang, 2021, Study on artificial intelligence: the state of the art and future prospects, J. Industr. Inf. Integr. Meindl, B. and Templ, M. "Analysis of commercial and free and open-source solvers for linear optimization problems," Eurostat and Statistics Netherlands within the project ESSnet on common tools and harmonised methodology for SDC in the ESS (20), 2012. Gearhart, 2013 Louvieris, 2010, Assessing critical success factors for military decision support, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 8229, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.062 Van Lent, 2004, An explainable artificial intelligence system for small-unit tactical behavior, 900 Adadi, 2018, Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), IEEE Access, 6, 52138, 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 Core, M.G., Lane, H.C., Van Lent, M., Gomboc, D., Solomon, S. and Rosenberg, M., 2006, July. Building explainable artificial intelligence systems. In AAAI (pp. 1766–1773). Došilović, 2018, Explainable artificial intelligence: a survey, 0210 Arrieta, 2020, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI, Information Fusion, 58, 82, 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 Weller A. (2019) Transparency: motivations and Challenges. In: Samek W., Montavon G., Vedaldi A., Hansen L., Müller KR. (eds) Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11700. Springer, Cham. Pu, 2007, Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems, Knowl. Based Syst., 20, 542, 10.1016/j.knosys.2007.04.004 Kirsch, A., 2017. Explain to whom? Putting the User in the Center of Explainable AI. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Comprehensibility and Explanation in AI and ML 2017 Co-Located With 16th International Conference of the Italian Association For Artificial Intelligence (AI* IA 2017). Norman, 2002 Gunning, 2019, DARPA's explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program, AI Mag., 40, 44 Vilone, G. and Longo, L., 2020. Explainable artificial intelligence: a systematic review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.00093. Fahner, 2018, Developing transparent credit risk scorecards more effectively: an explainable artificial intelligence approach, Data Anal., 2018, 17 Kuppa, 2020, Black Box Attacks on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods in Cyber Security, 1 Tjoa, E. and Guan, C., 2020. A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai): toward medical xai. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. Holzinger, 2019, Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine, Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev., 9, e1312 Putnam, V. and Conati, C., 2019, March. Exploring the Need for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS). In IUI Workshops (Vol. 19). Zeldam, S.G., 2018. Automated Failure Diagnosis in Aviation Maintenance Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (Master's thesis, University of Twente). Rehse, 2019, Towards explainable process predictions for industry 4.0 in the dfki-smart-lego-factory, KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 33, 181, 10.1007/s13218-019-00586-1 Miller, 2019, Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences, Artif. Intell., 267, 1, 10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 Guidotti, 2018, A survey of methods for explaining black box models, ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR), 51, 10.1145/3236009 Freitas, 2014, Comprehensible classification models, ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett., 15, 1, 10.1145/2594473.2594475 Wooldridge, 2012 Nigel, 2019 Wagner, G. AOR modelling and simulation: towards a general architecture for agent-based discrete event simulation, International Bi-Conference Workshop On Agent-Oriented Information Systems, 2003, pp. 174–188. Dubiel, B. and Tsimhoni, O. Integrating agent based modeling into a discrete event simulation, Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference (2005), 2005, pp. 1029–1037. Abar, 2017, Agent based modelling and simulation tools: a review of the state-of-art software, Computer Science Review, 13, 10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.03.001 Railsback, 2016, Agent-based simulation platforms: review and development recommendations, Simulation, 609 Cheliotis, 2020, An agent-based model of public space use, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. Sutcliffe, 2019, Reflecting on the design process for virtual reality applications, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., 35, 168, 10.1080/10447318.2018.1443898 Wang, 2019, Cooperative ramp merging system: agent-based modeling and simulation using game engine, SAE Int. J. Connected Autom. Vehicles, 2 Mourtzis, 2014, Design and planning of manufacturing networks for mass customisation and personalisation: challenges and outlook, Procedia CIRP, 19, 1, 10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.004 Longo, 2020, Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: a human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future, Appl. Sci., 10, 4182, 10.3390/app10124182 Nahavandi, 2019, Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution, Sustainability, 11, 4371, 10.3390/su11164371 Emmanouilidis, 2019, Enabling the human in the loop: linked data and knowledge in industrial cyber-physical systems, Annu. Rev. Control, 47, 249, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.03.004 Turner, 2016, Discrete event simulation and virtual reality use in industry: new opportunities and future trends, IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst., 46, 882, 10.1109/THMS.2016.2596099 Oyekan, 2019, Using Therbligs to embed intelligence in workpieces for digital assistive assembly, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 11, 2489, 10.1007/s12652-019-01294-2 Mourtzis, 2020, Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: state of the art and new trends, Int. J. Prod. Res., 58, 1927, 10.1080/00207543.2019.1636321 Romero, D., Stahre, J., Wuest, T., Noran, O., Bernus, P., Fast-Berglund, Å. and Gorecky, D., 2016, October. Towards an operator 4.0 typology: a human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference On Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE46), Tianjin, China (pp. 29–31). Milgram, 1994, A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays, IEICE Trans Inf Syst, 77, 1321 Mann, S., Furness, T., Yuan, Y., Iorio, J. and Wang, Z., 2018. All reality: Virtual, augmented, mixed (x), mediated (x,y), and multimediated reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.08386. Liu, Y., Dong, H., Zhang, L. and El Saddik, A. "Technical evaluation of HoloLens for multimedia: a first look," IEEE Multimedia (25:4), 2018, pp. 8–18. Khoshelham, 2019, Indoor mapping eyewear: geometric evaluation of spatial mapping capability of hololens, 805 Choi, 2015, Virtual reality applications in manufacturing industries: past research, present findings, and future directions, Concurrent Eng., 23, 40, 10.1177/1063293X14568814 Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) (2001) Virtual Reality Technology/Market Report. Daejon, 30 December pp. 12–29. Hummel, 2012, An evaluation of open source physics engines for use in virtual reality assembly simulations, 346 Ayani, 2018, Digital Twin: applying emulation for machine reconditioning, Procedia Cirp, 72, 243, 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.139 Jörg, 2019, Software Control for a Cyber-Physical System in a Manufacturing Environment based on a Game Engine, 1 Glatt, 2021, Modeling and implementation of a digital twin of material flows based on physics simulation, J. Manuf. Syst., 58, 231, 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.04.015 Aivaliotis, 2019, The use of Digital Twin for predictive maintenance in manufacturing, Int. J. Computer Integr. Manuf., 32, 1067, 10.1080/0951192X.2019.1686173 Erez, 2015, Simulation tools for model-based robotics: comparison of Bullet, Havok, MuJoCo, ODE and PhysX, 4397 Millington, 2010 Fumarola, M., Seck, M. and Verbraeck, A. "An approach for loosely coupled discrete event simulation models and animation components" 'Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference', 2010, pp. 2161–2170. Prajapat, 2020, Real-time discrete event simulation: a framework for an intelligent expert system approach utilising decision trees, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 110, 2893, 10.1007/s00170-020-06048-5 Prajapat, 2019, A framework for next generation interactive and immersive des models, 671 Veneri, 2018 Alcácer, 2019, Scanning the industry 4.0: a literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems, Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., 22, 899 Lu, 2017, Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues, J. Industr. Inf. Integr., 6, 1