Next Generation Quality: Assessing the Physician in Clinical History Completeness and Diagnostic Interpretations Using Funnel Plots and Normalized Deviations Plots in 3,854 Prostate Biopsies

Journal of Pathology Informatics - Tập 8 - Trang 43 - 2017
Michael Bonert1, Ihab El-Shinnawy1, Michael Carvalho1, Phillip Williams2, Samih Salama1, Damu Tang3, Anil Kapoor4
1Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
3Division of Nephrology, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
4Division of Urology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bragg, 2010, Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: Cross sectional study, BMJ, 341, 10.1136/bmj.c5065 Napolitano, 2016, Machine learning classification of surgical pathology reports and chunk recognition for information extraction noise reduction, Artif Intell Med, 70, 77, 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.06.001 Spiegelhalter, 2005, Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance, Stat Med, 24, 1185, 10.1002/sim.1970 Mayer, 2009, Funnel plots and their emerging application in surgery, Ann Surg, 249, 376, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a47b1 Albertsen, 2005, Prostate cancer and the will rogers phenomenon, J Natl Cancer Inst, 97, 1248, 10.1093/jnci/dji248 Berney, 2014, The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: Areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists, Histopathology, 64, 405, 10.1111/his.12284 Athanazio, 2017, Global Gleason grade groups in prostate cancer: Concordance of biopsy and radical prostatectomy grades and predictors of upgrade and downgrade, Histopathology, 70, 1098, 10.1111/his.13179 Arias-Stella, 2015, Prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score correlation in heterogenous tumors: Proposal for a composite Gleason score, Am J Surg Pathol, 39, 1213, 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000499 Epstein, 2005, The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma, Am J Surg Pathol, 29, 1228, 10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1 Egevad, 2016, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer _ An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading, APMIS, 124, 433, 10.1111/apm.12533 Epstein, 2016, The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system, Am J Surg Pathol, 40, 244, 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530 Duggan, 2016, Alberta Health Services: Anatomical Pathology Quality Assurance Plan, Canadian Journal of Pathology, 8, 10 Giunchi, 2017, Interpathologist concordance in the histological diagnosis of focal prostatic atrophy lesions, acute and chronic prostatitis, PIN, and prostate cancer, Virchows Arch, 470, 711, 10.1007/s00428-017-2123-1 Luttman, 1998, Next generation quality, part 1: Gateway to clinical process excellence, Top Health Inf Manage, 19, 12 Luttman, 1998, Next generation quality, Part 2: Balanced scorecards and organizational improvement, Top Health Inf Manage, 19, 22