Newly Licensed RNs' Characteristics, Work Attitudes, and Intentions to Work

American Journal of Nursing - Tập 107 Số 9 - Trang 58-70 - 2007
Christine Kovner1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, Carol S. Brewer1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, Susan Fairchild1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, Shakthi Poornima1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, Hongsoo Kim1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, Maja Djukic1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
1A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF NEWLY LICENSED RNS AND THEIR EMPLOYMENT PATTERNS IS CRUCIAL TO REDUCING TURNOVER RATES.
2AJN editor-in-chief Diana Mason serves on the national advisory group for this research project. She recused herself from all decisions regarding the acceptance of this article for publication. AJN editorial board member Donna Diers, PhD, RN, FAAN, served as the handling editor.
3Christine T. Kovner is a professor at New York University College of Nursing in New York City. Carol S. Brewer is an associate professor in the School of Nursing at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
4Contact author: Christine T. Kovner, [email protected].
5Hongsoo Kim is an assistant professor at the New York University College of Nursing.
6Maja Djukic is a research assistant at the New York University College of Nursing.
7Support for this study was provided by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in Princeton, NJ.
8Susan Fairchild is a project director at New York University College of Nursing. Shakthi Poornima is a research assistant at the University at Buffalo Department of Linguistics.
9The authors of this article have no significant ties, financial or otherwise, to any company that might have an interest in the publication of this educational activity.
10The authors would like to thank the national advisory group for this project: Brenda L. Cleary, Linda Quinn Everett, David Goodman, Kevin Kenward, Diana J. Mason, and James Price.

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

A, 2007, Better late than never: workforce supply implications of later entry into nursing., Health Aff (Millwood), 26, 178, 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.178

2002, RN vacancy and turnover rates in 2000., J Nurs Adm, 32, 437, 10.1097/00005110-200209000-00001

R, 2004, A partnership between nursing education and practice: using an empowerment model to retain new nurses., J Nurs Adm, 34, 26, 10.1097/00005110-200401000-00007

2002, New graduate orientation in the rural community hospital., J Contin Educ Nurs, 33, 203, 10.3928/0022-0124-20020901-05

M, 2004, Medication management by graduate nurses: before, during and following medication administration., Nurs Health Sci, 6, 83, 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.00178.x

S, 2003, Minimum staffing ratios: the California workforce initiative survey., Nurs Econ, 21, 65

A, 2004, Improving the retention rate of newly graduated nurses., J Nurses Staff Dev, 20, 268, 10.1097/00124645-200411000-00006

1997, Student pre-entry experience and first year of employment., J Contin Educ Nurs, 28, 223, 10.3928/0022-0124-19970901-09

B, 2004, New nurses perceptions of nursing practice and quality patient care., J Nurs Care Qual, 19, 76, 10.1097/00001786-200401000-00014

2004, Structured orientation for new graduates: a retention strategy., J Nurses Staff Dev, 20, 118, 10.1097/00124645-200405000-00003

O, 2001, New graduate RN internship program: a collaborative approach for system-wide integration., J Nurses Staff Dev, 17, 144, 10.1097/00124645-200105000-00010

2000, Sense of belonging and new graduate job satisfaction., J Nurses Staff Dev, 16, 103, 10.1097/00124645-200005000-00002

2004, Supporting new nurses in evidence-based practice., J Nurs Adm, 34, 490, 10.1097/00005110-200411000-00004

2003, A study of transition: the new nurse graduate at 3 months., J Contin Educ Nurs, 34, 103, 10.3928/0022-0124-20030501-05

, Design and methods for the community tracking study., The Center, d

G, 1997, Job satisfaction and organizational attachment of nurses holding doctoral degrees., Nurs Res, 46, 163, 10.1097/00006199-199705000-00007

1993, Nurses job satisfaction: a meta-analysis of related variables., Nurs Res, 42, 36

B, 1988, Measurement of kinship responsibility for organizational research., J Appl Psychol, 73, 402, 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.402

W, 1988, Differences in work unit outcomes. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover among hospital nursing department employees., West J Nurs Res, 10, 98, 10.1177/019394598801000110

M, 1992, Employee commitment: resolving some issues., Work Occup, 19, 211, 10.1177/0730888492019003001

2001, Reflections on the determinants of voluntary turnover., Int J Manpow, 22, 600, 10.1108/EUM0000000006233

1998, Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory., J Occup Health Psychol, 3, 356, 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356

2002, Development of the practice environment scale of the Nursing Work Index., Res Nurs Health, 25, 176, 10.1002/nur.10032

F, 1997, Developing and testing an integrative model of the work-family interface., J Vocat Behav, 50, 145, 10.1006/jvbe.1996.1577

1985, Toward a consensual structure of mood., Psychol Bull, 98, 219, 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219

K, 2006, Factors associated with work satisfaction of registered nurses., J Nurs Scholarsh, 38, 71, 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2006.00080.x

1990, Economic, psychological, and sociological determinants of voluntary turnover., J Behav Econ, 19, 321, 10.1016/0090-5720(90)90034-5

Price, 3, The development of a causal model of voluntary turnover. In: Griffeth R, Hom P, editors. Innovative theory and empirical research on employee turnover. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Pub.; 2004., p, -34

S, 1999, Review of magnet hospital research: findings and implications for professional nursing practice., J Nurs Adm, 29, 9, 10.1097/00005110-199901000-00003

2006, Variations in nursing practice environments: relation to staffing and hospital characteristics., Nurs Res, 55, 1, 10.1097/00006199-200601000-00001

2270217, Cal. Admin., Code tit, 2003

A, 2002, Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction., JAMA, 288, 1987, 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987

2002, Stresses and challenges for new graduates in hospitals., Nurse Educ Today, 22, 225, 10.1054/nedt.2001.0695

C, 2004, The graduate nurse experience., J Nurs Adm, 34, 303, 10.1097/00005110-200406000-00010

Halfer, 2006, Graduate nurse perceptions of the work experience., Nurs Econ, 24, 150

2006, The impact of a nurse externship program on the transition process from graduate to registered nurse: Part III. Recruitment and retention effects., J Nurses Staff Dev, 22, 11, 10.1097/00124645-200601000-00003

Hayes, 2006, Career intentions of nursing students and new nurse graduates: a review of the literature., Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh, 3, Article, 10.2202/1548-923X.1281

2004, Work identities of nurses: between caring and efficiency demands., Career Development International, 9, 274, 10.1108/13620430410535850

2006, Generational diversity: impact on recruitment and retention of registered nurses., J Nurs Adm, 36, 10, 10.1097/00005110-200601000-00004

2005, What nurses want. Different generations. Different expectations., Hosp Health Netw, 79, 34

S, 2005, The multigenerational nursing work force: essential differences in perception of work environment., J Nurs Adm, 35, 283

2004, The costs of nurse turnover: part 1: an economic perspective., J Nurs Adm, 34, 562

2005, The costs of nurse turnover, part 2: application of the Nursing Turnover Cost Calculation Methodology., J Nurs Adm, 35, 41

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

American Journal of Nursing

Tập 107 Số 9

58-70

Thông tin tác giả