New evidence of agriculture as an underdeveloped sector of the U.S. economy

The Annals of Regional Science - Tập 14 - Trang 43-56 - 1980
Bill R. Miller1, Fred C. White1
1Department of Agric. Economics, University of Georgia, USA

Tóm tắt

The most frequently used form of macroeconomic model at the state and also sub-state levels has been input-output analysis. A principal problem of input-output studies has been the high cost of constructing transaction tables describing economic flows in the model. As an alternative, this paper develops an econometric inter-industry model to quantify the linkages between the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors of state and sub-state economies. The model is estimated for the 48 contiguous states, and value added multipliers are calculated for agriculture and basic industries. In contrast to conventional views, the results from this study indicate that, at the margin, a majority of the states are over-industrialized and underdeveloped in agriculture. Increased agricultural output without significant increases in costs would be relatively more important than additional production in basic industries. This situation is no doubt new, resulting from the current structure of the U.S. economy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alonso, William. “Aspects of Regional Planning and Theory in the United States,”Regional Policy Readings in Theory and Applications, John Friedmann and William Alonso, eds., Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1975, 773–787. Anderson, Clayton Oswal. “Simulation of the Peanut Production Area Economy in Georgia: Implications for Changes in the Peanut Program,” Masters Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 1978. Chen, Dean T. “The Wharton Agricultural Model: Structure, Specification, and Some Simulation Results,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59 (1977), 107–116 Cromarty, William A. “An Econometric Model for United States Agriculture,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54 (1959), 556–574. Czamanski, Stanislaw and E. E. Malizia. “Applicability and Limitations in the Use of National Input-Output Tables for Regional Studies,”The Regional Science Association Papers, 23 (1969), 65–83. Doeksen, Gerald A. and Charles H. Little. “An Analysis of Oklahoma's Economy by Districts Using Input-Output Techniques,”Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, December 1969, 27–36. Evans, Michael K. “An Agricultural Sub-model for the United States Economy,”Essays in Industrial Economics II, ed. L. Klein, University of Pennsylvania, 1969, 63–145. Fox, Karl A. “A Sub-model of the Agricultural Sector,” The BrookingsQuarterly Econometric Model of the United States, eds. James S. Duessenberry, Garry Fromm, Lawrence R. Klein and Edwin Kuh, Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1965, 409–461. Haveman, R. H. and John V. Krutilla.Unemployment, Idle Capacity, and the Evaluation of Public Expenditures: National and Regional Analysis. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968. Heady, Earl O. and W. Chandler.Linear Programming Methods, Fourth Printing, Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Press, 1964. Heien, Dale, Jim Matthews, and Abner Womack. “A Methods Note on the Gauss-Seidel Algorithm for Solving Econometric Models,”Agricultural Economics Research, 25 (1973), 71–80. Hoover, E. M. and Joseph Fisher. “Research in Regional Economic Growth,”Problems in the Study of Economic Growth, Universities—National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1949. Miernyk, W. H.The Elements of Input-Output Analysis, Fifth Printing, New York: Random House, 1967. Miller, Bill R. and Peng Li-Liu. “Regional Input-Output Models Adjusted by Import-Export Survey Data,”Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 7 (1975), 61–68. Morrison, W. I. and P. Smith. “Nonsurvey Input-Output Techniques at the Small Area Level: An Evaluation,”Journal of Regional Science, 14 (1974), 1–4. Nicholls, William H. “Industrialization, Factor Markets, and Agricultural Development,”Regional Policy Readings in Theory and Applications, John Friedmann and William Alonso, eds., Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1975, 358–379. North, Douglass C. “Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth,”Regional Policy Readings in Theory and Applications, John Friedmann and William Alonso, eds., Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1975, 332–347. Perloff, Harvey and Lowdon Wingo, Jr. “Natural Resource Endowment and Regional Economic Growth,”Regional Policy Readings in Theory and Applications, John Friedmann and William Alonso, eds., Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1975, 307–331. Roop, Joseph M. and Randolph H. Zeitner. “Agricultural Activity and the General Economy: Some Macromodel Experiments,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59 (1977), 117–125. U.S. Bureau of the Census.U.S. Census of Population, 1970 and Area of the United States, 1940, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1972. U.S. Bureau of the Census.Annual Survey of Manufacturers, 1975, M75 (A8)-6, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1976. U.S. Bureau of the Census.U.S. Census of Retail Trade, 1972, Area Series, RC72A-1 to 52, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1973. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.Survey of Current Business, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, August 1976 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Employment and Earnings, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1975. U.S. Department of Agriculture.State Farm Income Statistics, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1976.