New Sonographic Classification of Adenomyosis: Do Type and Degree of Adenomyosis Correlate to Severity of Symptoms?

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology - Tập 27 - Trang 1308-1315 - 2020
Caterina Exacoustos1, Giulia Morosetti1, Francesca Conway1, Sara Camilli1, Francesco Giuseppe Martire1, Lucia Lazzeri2, Emilio Piccione1, Errico Zupi1
1Department of Biomedicine and Prevention Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” (Drs. Exacoustos, Morosetti, Conway, Camilli, Giuseppe Martire, Piccione, and Zupi), Rome
2Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Siena (Dr. Lazzeri), Siena, Italy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Van den Bosch, 2015, Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 46, 284, 10.1002/uog.14806

Parazzini, 2005, Determinants of short term recurrence rate of endometriosis, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 121, 216, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.033

Vercellini, 1995, Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: a study on frequency distribution and patient characteristics, Hum Reprod, 10, 1160, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136111

Bergholt, 2001, Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy, Hum Reprod, 16, 2418, 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2418

Bromley, 2000, Adenomyosis: sonographic findings and diagnostic accuracy, J Ultrasound Med, 19, 529, 10.7863/jum.2000.19.8.529

Seidman, 1996, Pathologic findings from the Maryland Women's Health Study: practice patterns in the diagnosis of adenomyosis, Int J Gynecol Pathol, 15, 217, 10.1097/00004347-199607000-00005

Naftalin, 2012, How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic, Hum Reprod, 27, 3432, 10.1093/humrep/des332

Shwayder, 2014, Imaging for uterine myomas and adenomyosis, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 21, 362, 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.011

Bazot, 2001, Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology, Hum Reprod, 16, 2427, 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2427

Dueholm, 2007, Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis, Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 19, 505, 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f1bf00

Exacoustos, 2014, Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 28, 655, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.04.010

Leyendecker, 2015, Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 291, 917, 10.1007/s00404-014-3437-8

Vercellini, 2014, Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Hum Reprod, 29, 964, 10.1093/humrep/deu041

Bergeron, 2006, Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20, 511, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.016

Tomassetti, 2013, Adenomyosis and subfertility: evidence of association and causation, Semin Reprod Med, 31, 101, 10.1055/s-0032-1333475

Naftalin, 2016, Association between ultrasound features of adenomyosis and severity of menstrual pain, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 47, 779, 10.1002/uog.15798

Lazzeri, 2018, A sonographic classification of adenomyosis: interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of type and degree of the myometrial involvement, Fertil Steril, 110, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.031

Higham, 1990, Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 97, 734, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x

Guerriero, 2008, Diagnostic value of transvaginal ‘tenderness-guided’ ultrasonography for the prediction of location of deep endometriosis, Hum Reprod, 23, 2452, 10.1093/humrep/den293

Bazot, 2002, Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 20, 605, 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00852.x

Kepkep, 2007, Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 30, 341, 10.1002/uog.3985

Reinhold, 1996, Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation, Radiology, 199, 151, 10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633139

Naftalin, 2012, How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic, Hum Reprod, 27, 3432, 10.1093/humrep/des332

Siegler, 1994, J Reprod Med, 39, 841

Ferenczy, 1998, Pathophysiology of adenomyosis, Hum Reprod Update, 4, 312, 10.1093/humupd/4.4.312

Haines, 1995

Van den Bosch, 2019, Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 53, 576, 10.1002/uog.19096

Levgur, 2000, Adenomyosis: symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations, Obstet Gynecol, 95, 688

Parazzini, 1997, Risk factors for adenomyosis, Hum Reprod, 12, 1275, 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1275

Weiss, 2009, Adenomyosis a variant, not a disease? Evidence from hysterectomized menopausal women in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), Fertil Steril, 91, 201, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.025

Sakhel, 2012, Sonography of adenomyosis, J Ultrasound Med, 31, 805, 10.7863/jum.2012.31.5.805

Naftalin, 2014, Is adenomyosis associated with menorrhagia, Hum Reprod, 29, 473, 10.1093/humrep/det451