New (Other?) Directions in Corporate Social Responsibility
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this article is to challenge scholars of corporate social responsibility and CSR officers of private corporations to rethink their subject matter and their approach. The fundamental problem that needs to be addressed in CSR scholarship is whether it is descriptive or normative or something else. I maintain that much of the current literature is inadequately descriptive and philosophically deficient with regard to norms. I suggest a number of additional activities for CSR research (e.g., consumer responsibility) compatible with a morally pluralistic world that is hospitable to a market economy.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1990). Dialectic of the Enlightenment. J. Cumming (trans.). New York: Continuum.
Bloom, A. (1987). The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Brenkert, G. (2002). Entrepreneurship, Ethics, and the Good Society (Ruffin Series in Business Ethics. Society of Business Ethics).
Buruma, I., & Margalit, A. (2005). Occidentalism. The West in the Eyes of its Enemies. London: Penguin.
Capaldi, N. (1998). The enlightenment project in the analytic conversation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture.
Capaldi, N. (2004). The ethical foundations of free market societies. The Journal of Private Enterprise, XX(1), 30–54.
Carl Becker, C. (1962). The Heavenly City of the 18th-Century Philosophers. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. (2016). Managers’ Political Ideology and Gender Inequality within Organizations. Social Science Research Network.
Carroll, A. (2008). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Jouvenel, B. (1974). The Treatment of Capitalism by Continental Intellectuals. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Capitalism and the Historians. Chicago: Universirty of Chicago Press.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
Epstein, E. M. (1999). The continuing quest for accountable, ethical, and humane corporate capitalism. Business & Society, 38, 253–267.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (pp. 32–33). New York: Times Magazine.
Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.
Hollander, P. (2006). Political Pilgrims: Western Intellectuals in Search of the Good Society. New York: Transaction books.
Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59–67.
Klein, P. (2006). Why Economists Still Support Socialism. Mises Daily Article.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
McCarthy, J. (Ed.). (1998). Modern Enlightenment and the Rule of Reason. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
Mises, L. (1975). The Anti-Capitalist Mentality. Auburn: Mises Institute.
Nozick, R. (1998). Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism? Washington, D.C.: Cato Policy Report.
Ryan, L. V. (2006). Foundation and form of the field of business ethics. Journal of Private Enterprise, XXI(2), 34–49.
Schumpeter, J. (1975). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.
Shaw, W. H. (1996). Business ethics today: A survey. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 489–500.
Solomon, D. (2006). Domestic disarray and imperial ambition: contemporary applied ethics and the prospects for global bioethics. In H. T. Engelhardt (Ed.), Global Bioethics. Salem: Ma. Scrivener.
Tierney, J. (2006). Capitalism with a Heart. New York Times.
Wood, J. A., Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (1998). Ethical attitudes of students and business professionals: A study of moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 249–257.