New Imaging Protocols for New Single Photon Emission CT Technologies

Dilsizian V, Narula J: Atlas of Nuclear Cardiology, edn 3. Springer; Philadelphia, PA: 2009. • Slomka PJ, Patton JA, Berman DS, Germano G: Advances in technical aspects of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:255–276. This is a comprehensive review of the technical aspects of the new systems and software. Lewin HC, Hyun MC: A clinical comparison of an upright triple-head digital detector system to a standard supine dual-head gamma camera [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol 2005, 12:113. www.CardiArc.com. Accessed May 30, 2008. Jaszczak RJ, Li J, Wang H, et al.: Pinhole collimation for ultra-high-resolution, small-field-of-view SPECT. Phys Med Biol 1994, 39:425–437. Schramm NU, Ebel G, Engeland U, et al.: High-resolution SPECT using multipinhole collimation. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 2003, 50:315–320. Beekman FJ, Vastenhouw B: Design and simulation of a high-resolution stationary SPECT system for small animals. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49:4579–4592. Volokh L, Hugg J, Blevis I, et al.: Effect of detector energy response on image quality of myocardial perfusion SPECT. Paper presented at IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference. Dresden, Germany; October 19–26, 2008. Vija H, Chapman J, Ray M: IQ•SPECT technology White Paper. Siemens Medical Solutions USA Molecular Imaging; 2008:1–7. Hudson HM, Larkin RS: Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1994, 13:601–609. Ultraspect. www.UltraSPECT.com. Accessed September 6, 2008. Borges-Neto S, Pagnanelli RA, Shaw LK, et al.: Clinical results of a novel wide beam reconstruction method for shortening scan time of Tc-99m cardiac SPECT perfusion studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2007, 14:555–565. Herzog BA, Buechel RR, Katz R, et al.: Nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector technique: optimized protocol for scan time reduction. J Nucl Med 2010, 51:46–51. Buechel RR, Herzog BA, Husmann L, et al.: Ultrafast nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging on a new gamma camera with semiconductor detector technique: first clinical validation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009, In press. • Esteves FP, Raggi P, Folks RD, et al.: Novel solid-state-detector dedicated cardiac camera for fast myocardial perfusion imaging: multicenter comparison with standard dual detector cameras. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:927–934. This is the first clinical US study of the new multi-pinhole detector system. Sharir T, Ben-Haim S, Merzon K, et al.: High-speed myocardial perfusion imaging: initial clinical comparison with conventional dual detector anger camera imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 1:156–163. • Berman DS, Kang X, Tamarappoo B, et al.: Stress thallium-201/rest technetium-99m sequential dual isotope high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:273–282. This is a novel Tl/Tc protocol for dose-efficient fast stress and rest MPS scanning. Nishina H, Slomka PJ, Abidov A, et al.: Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006, 47:51–58. •• Sharir T, Slomka P, Hayes S, et al.: Multicenter trial of high-speed vs. conventional SPECT imaging: quantitative results of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, In press. This article includes a comparison of fully automated perfusion quantification for conventional and fast SPECT. Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, et al.: Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol 2005, 12:66–77. Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, et al.: Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 1995, 36:2138–2147. Maddahi J, Mendez R, Mahmarian JJ, et al.: Prospective multicenter evaluation of rapid, gated SPECT myocardial perfusion upright imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:351–357. DePuey EG, Bommireddipalli S, Clark J, et al.: Wide beam reconstruction “quarter-time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to “full-time” ordered subset expectation maximum. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:736–752. Cahill JM, Ficaro EP, Corbett JR: 4.11: Value of same-session coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring in the setting of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC). J Nucl Cardiol 2008, 15:12. Koss J, Kirch D, Steele P: Fast acquisition of myocardial perfusion and LV contractile indices with multi-pinhole SPECT [abstract]. J Nucl Med 2009, 50(Suppl 2):1144. Heller GV, Bateman TM, Johnson LL, et al.: Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2004, 11:273–281. Iskandrian AE: Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging: a new paradigm. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, In press. Venero CV, Heller GV, Bateman TM, et al.: A multicenter evaluation of a new post-processing method with depth-dependent collimator resolution applied to full-time and half-time acquisitions without and with simultaneously acquired attenuation correction. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:714–725. Ali I, Ruddy TD, Almgrahi A, et al.: Half-time SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 2009, 50:554. • Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, et al.: Multicenter investigation comparing a highly efficient half-time stress-only attenuation correction approach against standard rest-stress Tc-99m SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:726–735. This article demonstrates the feasibility of stress-only fast MPS protocols. Gambhir SS, Berman DS, Ziffer J, et al.: A novel high-sensitivity rapid-acquisition single-photon cardiac imaging camera. J Nucl Med 2009, 50:635. Kacperski K, Erlandsson K, Ben-Haim S, et al.: Iterative deconvolution of simultaneous dual radionuclide projections for CdZnTe based cardiac SPECT. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; 2008:5260–5263. Kiat H, Germano G, Friedman J, et al.: Comparative feasibility of separate or simultaneous rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m-sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 1994, 35:542. Steele PP, Kirch DL, Koss JE: Comparison of simultaneous dual-isotope multipinhole SPECT with rotational SPECT in a group of patients with coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2008, 49:1080. Ben-Haim S, Kacperski K, Hain S, et al.: Simultaneous dual-radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with a solid-state dedicated cardiac camera. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010, In press. Beller GA: Will cardiac positron emission tomography ultimately replace SPECT for myocardial perfusion imaging? J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:841–843. Funk T, Kirch DL, Koss JE, et al.: A novel approach to multipinhole SPECT for myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 2006, 47:595–602. Huang Q, Boutchko R, Reutter B, Gullberg G: Dynamic imaging with a novel dedicated cardiac SPECT system. J Nucl Med 2009, 50(Suppl 2):525P. Breault C, Roth N, Slomka P, et al.: Quantification of coronary vasodilator reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging: a feasibility study [abstract]. J Nucl Cardiol 2010, (in press). Slomka P, Kavanagh PB, Javadi M, et al.: Evaluation of a new automatic algorithm for quantification of ECG-gated 82Rb cardiac PET. J Nucl Med 2009, 50(Suppl 2):217P. Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Germano G: Applications and software techniques for integrated cardiac multimodality imaging. Exp Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2008, 6:27–41. Gutstein A, Wolak A, Lee C, et al.: Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008, 2:81-90. • Husmann L, Herzog BA, Gaemperli O, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating. Eur Heart J 2009, 30:600. Novel protocols are proposed in this article, which combine MPS and CCTA. DePuey EG: New software methods to cope with reduced counting statistics: shorter SPECT acquisitions and many more possibilities. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:335–338. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, et al.: Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:340–346. Santana CA, Garcia EV, Faber TL, et al.: Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:201–211. Slomka PJ, Cheng VY, Dey D, et al.: Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by coregistered 64-slice coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2009, 50:1621–1630. Zeng GL, Stevens AM: Multidivergent-beam stationary cardiac SPECT. Med Phys 2009, 36:2860–2869. Dey J: Conference record for IEEE NSS-MIC. 2009, In press.