Neutron-proton interactions in the energy range (290 ÷ 970) MeV

Il Nuovo Cimento (1911-1923) - Tập 33 - Trang 1509-1537 - 2007
J. G. Rushbrooke1, D. V. Bugg1, A. J. Oxley1, J. A. Zoll1, M. Jobes2, J. Kinson1, L. Riddiford2, B. Tallini1
1Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge
2Department of Physies, The University, Birmingham

Tóm tắt

A study of inelastic n-p interactions has been made using the Birmingham 1 GeV synchrotron and a 9 in. diameter liquid hydrogen bubble chamber. 1840 three-pronged events initiated by neutrons in the energy range (290 ÷ 970) MeV have been analysed, the possible reactions being: n + p → p + p + π−; n + p → n + p + π0, π0 → e+ + e- + γ, and n + p → n + p + π+ + π−. The ratio found for the integrated cross-sections σ(n + p → n + p + π0) /σ (n + p → p + p + ρ-) = 2.67 ± 0.43 is shown to resolve a long-standing conflict with charge independence. The energy-dependence of the n + p → p + p + π− cross-section has been inferred from the expected shape of the incident neutron spectrum with the aid of earlier cross-section measurements in the energy range. The laboratory kinetic energy distributions and centre-of-mass angular distributions for protons from ppπ- events suggest that the peripheral mechanism of interaction is important at lower energies and to a greater extent than indicated by the one-pion-exchange model. However the Treiman-Yang test for this model is satisfied for events involving small momentum transfer and (3, 3) isobar production. The cross-section for the reaction n + p → n + p + π+ + π- increases more quickly above threshold than required by the statistical model of Cerulus and Hagedorn, and much more so than required by one-pion-exchange processes. Comparison with p-p scattering results, in which double-pion production is far smaller, emphasizes the importance of theT=0 channel.

Tài liệu tham khảo

D. V. Bugg, A. J. Oxley, J. A. Zoll, J. G. Rushbrooke, V. E. Barnes, J. B. Kinson, W. P. Dodd, G. A. Doran andL. Riddiford:Phys. Rev.,133 B, 1017 (1964). W. J. Fickinger, E. Pickup, D. K. Robinson andE. O. Salant:Phys. Rev.,125, 2082 (1962). G. A. Smith, H. Courant, E. C. Fowler, H. Kraybill, J. Sandweiss andH. Taft:Phys. Rev.,123, 2160 (1961);E. L. Hart, R. I. Louttit, D. Luers, T. W. Morris, W. J. Willis andS. S. Yamamoto:Phys. Rev.,126, 747 (1962). A. P. Batson, B. B. Culwick, H. B. Klepp andL. Riddiford:Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A251, 233 (1959). W. A. Wallenmeyer:Phys. Rev.,105, 1058 (1957). W. B. Fowler, R. P. Shutt, A. M. Thorndike andW. L. Whittemore:Phys. Rev.,95, 1026 (1954). F. N. Holmquist: UCRL 8559 (1958). G. B. Yodh:Phys. Rev.,98, 1331 (1955); V. Dzhelepov, K. Oganesyan andV. Fliagin:Soviet Phys. JETP,2, 757 (1956); Y. M. Kazarinov, Y. N. Simonov:Soviet Phys., JETP,8, 56 (1959); A. F. Dunaitsev andY. D. Prokoshkin:Soviet Phys. JETP,11, 540 (1960), where a comprehensive review is given of single-pion production, including an extensive list of references. J. G. Rushbrooke:Ph. D. Thesis, University of Cambridge (1962). M. Jobes:Ph. D. Thesis, University of Birmingham (1964). V. Kiselev, K. Oganesyan, R. Poze andV. Fliagin:Soviet Phys. JETP,8, 564 (1958). Further details of neutron spectra from proton-nucleus collisions may be found inB. Nelson, G. Guernsey andG. Mott:Phys. Rev.,88, 1 (1952);J. de Pangher:Phys. Rev.,99, 1447 (1955);A. J. Hartzler andR. Siegel:Phys. Rev.,95, 181, 591 (1954). Y. D. Prokoshkin andA. A. Tyapkin:Soviet Phys. JETP,5, 618 (1957); B. S. Neganov andO. Savchenko:Soviet Phys. JETP,5, 1033 (1957); A. Mesh-kowskii, I. Shalamov andV. Shebanov:Soviet Phys. JETP,8, 46 (1959); T. H. Fields, J. C. Fox, J. A. Kane, R. A. Stallwood andR. B. Sutton:Phys. Rev.,109, 1713, 1716 (1958); G. D. Mead: UCRL 10187 (1962). S. Mandelstam:Proe. Roy. Soc. (London), A244, 491 (1958). A. H. Rosenfeld:Phys. Rev.,96, 139 (1954). R. R. Larsen: UCRL 9292 (1960). H. Palevsky, J. A. Moore, R. L. Steavens, H. R. Muether, R. J. Sutter, R. E. Chrien, A. P. Jain andK. Otnes:Phys. Rev. Lett.,9, 509 (1962). W. P. Dodd:Ph. D. Thesis, University of Birmingham (1963). S. J. Lindenbaum andK. M. Sternheimer:Phys. Rev.,105, 1874 (1957); R. M. Sternheimer andS. J. Lindenbaum:Phys. Rev.,123, 333 (1961). F. F. Chen, C. P. Leavitt andA. M. Shapiro:Phys. Rev.,103, 211 (1956). F. Cerulus andR. Hagedorn:Nuovo Cimento,9, 646 (1958). R. Hagedorn:Nuovo Cimento,25, 1017 (1963). D. W. Joseph:Nuovo Cimento,16, 997 (1960). E. Ferrari andF. Selleri:Suppl. Nuovo Cimento,24, 453 (1962). E. Ferrari andF. Selleri:Nuovo Cimento,27, 1450 (1963). V. E. Barnes, D. V. Bugg, W. P. Dodd, J. B. Kinson andL. Riddiford:Phys. Rev. Lett.,7, 288 (1961). S. B. Treiman andC. N. Yang:Phys. Rev. Lett,8, 140 (1962). E. Ferrari:Phys. Lett.,2, 66 (1962). G. Morpurgo:Nuovo Cimento,4, 1222 (1956);5, 1787 (1957). P. Eberhard andM. L. Good:Phys. Rev.,120, 1442 (1960). M. Peshkin:Phys. Rev.,123, 637 (1961). R. K. Adair:Phys. Rev.,100, 1540 (1955). M. Derrick, J. C. Fetkovich, T. H. Fields andJ. Deahl:Phys. Rev.,120, 1022 (1960). N. P. Samios:Phys. Rev.,121, 275 (1961). N. P. Samios, R. Plano, A. Prodell, M. Schwarz andJ. Steinberger:Phys. Rev.,126, 1884 (1962). N. M. Kroll andW. Wada:Phys. Rev.,98, 1355 (1955). E. Ferrari: CERN Int. Rep. 6078/TH 328 (1963). C. Baltay,et al.: Interactions of High-Energy Anti-protons in Hydrogen, paper submitted to theStanford Nucleon Structure Meeting (June 24–27, 1963).