Neural Interfaces for Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: The State of the Art and Future Possibilities

PM and R - Tập 3 Số 1 - Trang 55-67 - 2011
Aimee E. Schultz1, Todd Kuiken2,3
1Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 E. Superior Street, Room 1309, Chicago, IL 60611
2Department of PM&R, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
3Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

Tóm tắt

Current treatment of upper limb amputation restores some degree of functional ability, but this ability falls far below the standard set by the natural arm. Although acceptance rates can be high when patients are highly motivated and receive proper training and care, current prostheses often fail to meet the daily needs of amputees and frequently are abandoned. Recent advancements in science and technology have led to promising methods of accessing neural information for communication or control. Researchers have explored invasive and noninvasive methods of connecting with muscles, nerves, or the brain to provide increased functionality for patients experiencing disease or injury, including amputation. These techniques offer hope of more natural and intuitive prosthesis control, and therefore increased quality of life for amputees. In this review, we discuss the current state of the art of neural interfaces, particularly those that may find application within the prosthetics field.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005

Dorrance D.W., 1912, Artificial Hand. US patent 1,042,413

LeBlanc M., 1985, Innovation and improvement of body‐powered arm prostheses: A first step, Clin Prosthetics Orthotics, 9, 13

10.1007/BF02363433

Root Spiegel S., 1989, Comprehensive Management of the Upper‐Limb Amputee, 60, 10.1007/978-1-4612-3530-9_7

10.1097/00008526-199600810-00003

Muilenberg A.L., 1989, Comprehensive Management of the Upper‐Limb Amputee, 28, 10.1007/978-1-4612-3530-9_5

Takeda H., 2009, Development of prosthetic arm with pneumatic prosthetic hand and tendon‐driven wrist, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 5048

Dalley S.A., 2009, Design of a multifunctional anthropomorphic prosthetic hand with extrinsic actuation, ASME/IEEE Trans Mechatronics, 699, 10.1109/TMECH.2009.2033113

Weir R., 2007, New multifunctional prosthetic arm and hand systems, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 4359

Schulz S., 2007, Design and evaluation of a multifunction myoelectric prosthetic hand with force feedback system and fluidic actuators for different grasping types, Disabil Rehabil, 29

10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c

10.1088/1741-2560/6/3/036004

Young DJ Farnsworth BD Triolo RJ. Wireless implantable EMG sensor for powered prosthesis control. Paper presented at: 9th International Conference on Solid‐State and Integrated‐Circuit Technology; October 2008; Beijing China.

10.1109/TBME.2008.2005942

10.1109/10.398638

10.1109/10.204774

10.1109/86.736154

10.1109/86.867872

10.1109/TBME.2003.813539

10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.01.002

10.1109/TRA.2003.808873

10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/307

10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847357

Oskoei MAaH H., 2007, Myoelectric control systems—a survey, Biomed Signal Process Control, 2, 275, 10.1016/j.bspc.2007.07.009

Li G., 2009, Quantifying pattern recognition‐based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng, 18, 185, 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2039619

10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2023282

10.1001/jama.2009.116

10.1073/pnas.0706525104

10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.039

10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2032640

10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006724

10.1016/0006-8993(85)90771-1

10.1097/00005072-198111000-00007

Jia X.F., 2007, Residual motor signal in long‐term human severed peripheral nerves and feasibility of neural signal‐controlled artificial limb, J Hand Surg Am, 32, 657, 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.02.021

Dhillon G.S., 2004, Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: Implications for neural control of artificial limbs, J Hand Surg Am, 29, 605, 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.02.006

10.1109/TNSRE.2005.856072

10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2006207

10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10303.x

10.1109/TBME.2004.827535

10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2032603

Otto Bock.AcitGaithttp://ottobockus.com/cps/rde/xchg/ob_us_en/hs.xsl/4762.html Accessed July 13 2010

10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00231-0

10.1152/jn.00937.2004

10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.025

10.1109/TBME.2003.820321

10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00143-2

10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00231-2

10.1109/TBME.2007.891168

10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.004

10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00273-9

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.02-11-01527.1982

10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2676

10.1152/jn.1993.69.3.772

10.1109/TNSRE.2007.916269

10.1109/TNSRE.2007.916289

10.1038/416141a

10.1126/science.1070291

10.1038/nature06996

10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.037

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4415-07.2008

10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/010

10.1038/nature04970

10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.019

10.1016/S0006-8993(03)03023-3

10.1088/1741-2560/6/6/066001

10.1109/TNSRE.2005.857687

10.1016/0304-3940(92)90627-J

10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135241

10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.005

10.1038/nn890

10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.09.016

10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875549

10.1038/nn1158

Penfield W., 1950, The Cerebral Cortex of Man: A Clinical Study of Localization and Function

Amaral D.G., 2000, Principles of Neural Science

10.1038/32891

10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81156-3

10.1109/TNSRE.2007.907544

10.1088/1741-2560/5/1/008

10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.10.001

10.1038/18581

10.1109/86.847812

10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.04.007

10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/012

Arbel Y., 2007, Adapting the P300‐brain computer interface (BCI) for the control of a wheelchair‐mounted robotic arm system, Psychophysiology, 44, S82

10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3

10.1109/TRO.2009.2020347

10.1212/01.WNL.0000158616.43002.6D

10.1109/86.847823

10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/001

10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01471-3

10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.021

10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.006

10.1152/jn.00249.2002

10.1101/SQB.1990.055.01.079

10.1152/jn.1993.70.5.2136

Meek S.G., 1989, Extended physiologic taction: Design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system, J Rehabil Res Dev, 26, 53

10.1682/JRRD.1992.01.0001

10.1093/brain/awp082