Neural Habituation Enhances Novelty Detection: an EEG Study of Rapidly Presented Words
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbott, L. F., Varela, J. A., Sen, K., & Nelson, S. B. (1997). Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science, 275(5297), 220–224.
Anderson, J. R., Zhang, Q., Borst, J. P., & Walsh, M. M. (2016). The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Sternberg’s method. Psychological Review, 123(5), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000030.
Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M. (2001). Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 18(6), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/79.962275.
Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994). A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)90113-9.
Brouwer, H., Crocker, M. W., Venhuizen, N. J., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2017). A neurocomputational model of the N400 and the P600 in language processing. Cognitive Science, 41(Suppl 6), 1318–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461.
Burt, J. S., Kipps, T. J., & Matthews, J. R. (2014). Repetition in visual word identification: Benefits and costs. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 67(10), 1986–2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.896386.
Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. J. (2011). LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1961189.1961199.
Cheyette, S. J., & Plaut, D. C. (2017). Modeling the N400 ERP component as transient semantic over-activation within a neural network model of word comprehension. Cognition, 162, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.016.
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A 2-stage model for multiple-target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 109–127.
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
Davelaar, E. J., Tian, X., Weidemann, C. T., & Huber, D. E. (2011). A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(4), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0056-8.
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.
Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 109(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.1.75.
Di Lollo, V., & Bischof, W. F. (1995). The inverse-intensity effect in duration of visible persistence. Perception, 24, 25–25.
Di Lollo, V., & Dixon, P. (1992). Inverse duration effects in partial report. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1089.
Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/Hbm.10010.
Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64(1–2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00100-5.
Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans-A framework for defining “early” visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-001-0906-7.
Frank, S. L., Otten, L. J., Galli, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences. Brain and Language, 140, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.006.
Gomez Gonzalez, C. M., Clark, V. P., Fan, S., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 7(1), 41–51.
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006.
Haufe, S., Meinecke, F., Gorgen, K., Dahne, S., Haynes, J. D., Blankertz, B., et al. (2014). On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 87, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.067.
Huber, D. E. (2008). Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 137(2), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.324.
Huber, D. E., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003). Persistence and accommodation in short-term priming and other perceptual paradigms: Temporal segregation through synaptic depression. Cognitive Science, 27(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00012-0.
Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M., Quach, R., & Lyle, K. B. (2002). Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Memory & Cognition, 30(5), 745–757. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196430.
Huber, D. E., Clark, T. F., Curran, T., & Winkielman, P. (2008a). Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: Testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1305–1324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013370.
Huber, D. E., Tian, X., Curran, T., O'Reilly, R. C., & Woroch, B. (2008b). The dynamics of integration and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013625.
Irwin, K. R., Huber, D. E., & Winkielman, P. (2010). Automatic affective dynamics: An activation-habituation model of affective assimilation and contrast. Modeling Machine Emotions for Realizing Intelligence, 1, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12604-8.
Kappenman, E. S., Luck, S. J., Rossion, B., & Jacques, C. (2012). The N170: Understanding the time course of face perception in the human brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, 14–14.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.
Laszlo, S., & Armstrong, B. C. (2014). PSPs and ERPs: Applying the dynamics of post-synaptic potentials to individual units in simulation of temporally extended event-related potential reading data. Brain and Language, 132, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.002.
Laszlo, S., & Plaut, D. C. (2012). A neurally plausible parallel distributed processing model of event-related potential word reading data. Brain and Language, 120(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.001.
Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532.
Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133(4), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.475.
Long, G. M., Toppino, T. C., & Mondin, G. W. (1992). Prime-time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(6), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.3758/Bf03211697.
Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213.
Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Morey, R. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks-data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance, 10, 531–556.
Potter, K. W., Donkin, C., & Huber, D. E. (2018). The elimination of positive priming with increasing prime duration reflects a transition from perceptual fluency to disfluency rather than bias against primed words. Cognitive Psychology, 101, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.004.
Rabovsky, M., & McRae, K. (2014). Simulating the N400 ERP component as semantic network error: Insights from a feature-based connectionist attractor model of word meaning. Cognition, 132(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.010.
Rabovsky, M., Hansen, S. S., & McClelland, J. L. (2018). Modelling the N400 brain potential as change in a probabilistic representation of meaning. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0406-4.
Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive-processes. Psychological Review, 95(3), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.318.
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1019–1025.
Rieth, C. A., & Huber, D. E. (2010). Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 596–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018737.
Rieth, C. A., & Huber, D. E. (2013). Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030870.
Rieth, C. A., & Huber, D. E. (2017). Comparing different kinds of words and word-word relations to test an habituation model of priming. Cognitive Psychology, 95, 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.002.
Rugg, M. D. (1985). The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 22(6), 642–647.
Rusconi, P., & Huber, D. E. (2018). The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1717–1739. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1385-6.
Tian, X., & Huber, D. E. (2010). Testing an associative account of semantic satiation. Cognitive Psychology, 60(4), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.003.
Tian, X., & Huber, D. E. (2013). Playing “duck duck goose” with neurons: Change detection through connectivity reduction. Psychological Science, 24(6), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612459765.
Webster, M. A., & MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.3758/Bf03212974.
Weidemann, C. T., Huber, D. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2008). Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.257.