Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability

Journal of Transport Geography - Tập 17 Số 3 - Trang 234-244 - 2009
Erik Jenelius1
1Division of Transport and Location Analysis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Teknikringen 78B, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anselin, 1988

Jenelius, E., 2008. Considering the user inequity of road network vulnerability. Journal of Transport and Land Use, in press.

Baran, P., 1964. On distributed communications: I. Introduction to distributed communications networks. Memorandum RM-3420-PR, Rand Corporation.

2000

Berdica, 2002, An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done, Transport Policy, 9, 117, 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2

Beser, 2001, SAMPERS – the new Swedish national travel demand forecasting tool, 101

Chen, 2007, Network-based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks, Networks and Spatial Economics, 7, 241, 10.1007/s11067-006-9012-5

Cohen, 2000, Resilience of the Internet to random breakdowns, Physical Review Letters, 85, 4626, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4626

Department for Transport, 2004. The Changing Climate: Its Impacts on the Department for Transport. UK Department for Transport, April 2004.

Glover, 1975, The effect of population density on infrastructure: The case of road building, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 23, 453, 10.1086/450808

Haggett, 1969

Holme, 2002, Attack vulnerability of complex networks, Physical Review E, 65, 056109, 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.056109

Holmgren, 2006, Using graph models to analyze the vulnerability of electric power networks, Risk Analysis, 26, 955, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00791.x

2003

Jenelius, 2006, Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis, Transportation Research Part A, 40, 537

1999, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 33, 121, 10.1002/atr.5670330202

Miljödepartementet, 2007. Sverige inför klimatförändringarna – hot och möjligheter. Klimat- och sårbarhetsutredningen, Miljödepartementet, SOU 2007:60 (in Swedish).

2007

Patuelli, 2007, Network analysis of commuting flows: a comparative static approach to German data, Networks and Spatial Economics, 7, 315, 10.1007/s11067-007-9027-6

Qiang, 2008, A unified network performance measure with importance identification and the ranking of network components, Optimization Letters, 2, 127, 10.1007/s11590-007-0049-2

Scott, 2006, Network robustness index: a new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks, Journal of Transport Geography, 14, 215, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.10.003

Sohn, 2006, Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: an accessibility approach, Transportation Research Part A, 40, 491

2006, Networks and Spatial Economics, 6, 169, 10.1007/s11067-006-9278-7

Taylor, M.A.P., D’Este, G.M., 2004. Critical infrastructure and transport network vulnerability: developing a method for diagnosis and assessment. In: Nicholson, A., Dantas, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR), Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 96–102.

Taylor, 2006, Application of accessibility based methods for vulnerability analysis of strategic road networks, Networks and Spatial Economics, 6, 267, 10.1007/s11067-006-9284-9

Transportation Research Board, 2008. Potential impacts of climate change on US transportation. Transportation Research Board Special Report 290.