Nekton community change along estuarine salinity gradients: Can salinity zones be defined?
Tóm tắt
Organisms tend to inhabit predictable portions of estuaries along salinity gradients between the ocean inlets (salinity > 35 psu) and the freshwater tributaries (salinity = 0). Previous studies have suggested that the continuous change in biological community structure along this gradient is relatively rapid at certain salinities. This is the basis for estuarine salinity zonation schemes similar to the classic Venice System (i.e., 0–0.5, 0.5–5, 5–18, 18–30, 30–40, > 40). An extensive database (n > 16,000 samples) of frequency of occurrence of nekton was used to assess evidence for estuarine salinity zones in two southwest Florida estuaries: Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor. Rapid change in nekton community structure occurred at each end of the estuarine salinity gradient, with comparatively slow (but steady) change in between. There was little strong evidence for estuarine salinity zones at anything other than low salinities (0.1–1). As previously suggested by other authors, estuaries may be regarded as ecoclines, because they form areas of relatively slow but progressive ecological change. The ends of the estuarine salinity gradient appear to be ecotones (areas of rapid change) at the interfaces with adjacent freshwater and marine habitats. This study highlights the rapid change that occurs in nekton community structure at low salinities, which is of relevance to those managing freshwater inflow to estuaries.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Able, K. W., D. M. Nemerson, R. Bush, andP. Light. 2001. Spatial variation in Delaware Bay (U.S.A.) marsh creek fish assemblages.Estuarzes 24:441–452.
Alber, M. 2002. A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management.Estuarzes 25:1246–1261.
Anonyumous. 1958. The Venice System for the classification of marine waters according to salinity.Limnology and Oceanography 3:346–347.
Atrill, M. J. andS. D. Rundle. 2002. Ecotone or ecocline: Ecological boundaries in estuaries.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55:929–936.
Baltz, D. M. andR. F. Jones. 2003. Temporal and spatial patterns of microhabitat use by fishes and decapod crustaceans in a Louisiana estuary.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:662–678.
Boesch, D. F. 1977. A new look at the zonation of benthos along the estuarlne gradient, p. 245–266. In B. C. Coull (ed.), Ecology of Marine Benthos. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina.
Bray, J. R. andJ. T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin.Ecological Monographs 27:325–349.
Browder, J. A. andD. Moore. 1981. A new approach to determining the quantitative relationship between fishery production and the flow of fresh water to estuaries, p. 403–430. In R. Cross and D Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the National Symposium on Freshwater Inflow to Estuaries, Volume 1. FWS/OBS-81/04. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
Bulger, A. J., B. P. Hayden, M. E. Monaco, D. M. Nelson, andM. G. Mccormick-Ray. 1993. Biologically-based estuarine salinity zones derived from a multivariate analysis.Estuaries 16:311–322.
Christensen, J. D., M. E. Monaco, andT. A. Lowery. 1997. An index to assess the sensitivity of Gulf of Mexico species to changes in estuarine salinity regimes.Gulf Research Reports 9:219–229.
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure.Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117–143.
Clarke, K. R. andR. M. Warwick. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edition. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, U.K.
Croghan, P. C. 1983. Osmotic regulation and the evolution of brackish- and fresh-water faunas.Journal of the Geological Society of London 140:39–46.
Deaton, L. E. andM. J. Greenberg. 1986. There is no horohalinicum.Estuaries 9:20–30.
Drinkwater, K. F. andK. T. Frank. 1994. Effects of river regulation and diversion on marine fish and invertebrates.Aquatic Conservatzon: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 4:135–151.
Estevez, E. D. 2002. Review and assessment of biotic variables and analytical methods used in estuarine inflow studies.Estuaries 25:1291–1303.
Estevez, E. D., K. Dixon, andM. S. Flannery. 1991. West-coastal rivers of peninsular Florida, p. 187–221. In R. J. Livingston (ed.), The Rivers of Florida. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Farrell, M. D., J. Good, D. Hornsby, A. Janicki, R. Mattson, S. Upchurch, K. Champion, J. Chen, S. Grabe, K. Malloy, R. Nijbroek, J. Schneider, D. Wade, M. Wessel, andP. Batchelder. 2005. Technical Report: MFL Establishment for the Lower Suwannee River and Estuary, Little Fanning, Fanning, and Manatee Springs. Water Resource Associates, Inc., Tampa, Florida.
Flannery, M. S., E. B. Peebles, andR. T. Montgomery. 2002. A percent-of-flow approach for managing reductions of freshwater inflows from unimpounded rivers to southwest Florida estuaries.Estuaries 25:1318–1332.
Greenwood, M. F. D., P. W. Stevens, andR. E. Matheson, Jr. 2006. Effects of the 2004 hurricanes on the fish assemblages in two proximate southwest Florida estuaries: Change in the context of interannual variability.Estuanes and Coasts 29:985–996.
Idelberger, C. F. andM. F. D. Greenwood. 2005. Seasonal variation in fish assemblages within the estuarine portions of the Myakka and Peace Rivers, southwest Florida.Gulf of Mexico Science 23:224–240.
Kimmerer, W. J. 2002. Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco Estuary.Estuaries 25:1275–1290.
Kupschus, S. andD. Tremain. 2001. Associations between fish assemblages and environmental factors in nearshore habitats of a subtropical estuary.Journal of Fish Biology 58:1383–1403.
Lewis, R. R. andE. D. Estevez. 1988. The Ecology of Tampa Bay, Florida: An Estuarine Profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Biological Representative 85(7.18). U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
Livingston, R.J. 1988. Inadequacy of species-level designations for ecological studies of coastal migratory fishes.Environmental Biology of Fishes 22:225–234.
Mcpherson, B. F., R. L. Miller, andY. E. Stoker. 1996. Physical, Chemical, and Biological Characteristics of the Charlotte Harbor Basin and Estuarine System in Southwestern Florida-A Summary of the 1982-89 U.S. Geological Survey Charlotte Harbor Assessment and Other Studies. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2486. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Peebles, E. B., M. S. Flannery, R. E. Mattheson, Jr. andJ. P. Rast. 1991. Fish nursery utilization of the Little Manatee River Estuary (Florida): Relationships to physiochemical gradients and the distribution of food resources, p. 341–368. In S. F. Treat and P. A. Clark (eds.), Proceedings, Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposmm 2. Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Tampa, Florida.
Poulakis, G. R., D. A. Blewett, andM. E. Mitchell. 2003. The effects of season and proximity to fringing mangroves on seagrass-associated fish communities in Charlotte Harbor, Florida.Gulf of Mexico Science 21:171–184.
Remane, A. andC. Schlieper. 1971. Biology of Brackish Water, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Tsou, T. S. andR. E. Matheson, Jr. 2002. Seasonal changes in the nekton community of the Suwannee River Estuary and the potential impacts of freshwater withdrawal.Estuaries 25:1372–1381.
van de Velden, M. andH A. L. Kiers. 2005. Rotation in correspondence analysis.Journal of Classification 22:251–271.
Wagner, C. M. andH. M. Austin. 1999. Correspondence between environmental gradients and summer littoral fish assemblages in low salinity reaches of the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A.Marine Ecology Progress Series 177:197–212.
Wright, D. H. 1991. Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance.Journal of Biogeography 18:463–466.
Van de Velden, M. personal communication. Econometric Institute, Faculty of Economics, Erasmus Umversity, P. O. Box 1738, 3,000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.