Neighbourhood planning in England: A decade of institutional learning

Progress in Planning - Tập 174 - Trang 100749 - 2023
Gavin Parker1, Matthew Wargent2, Kat Salter3, Andy Yuille
1University of Reading, UK
2Cardiff University, UK
3University of Birmingham, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aalbers, 2013, Neoliberalism is dead… long live neoliberalism!, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1083, 10.1111/1468-2427.12065 Agger, 2012, Towards tailor-made participation: how to involve different types of citizens in participatory governance, Town Planning Review, 83, 29, 10.3828/tpr.2012.2 Alasuutari, 2015, The discursive side of new institutionalism, Cultural Sociology, 9, 162, 10.1177/1749975514561805 Apostolides, 2018, Neighbourhood planning in London: Fulfilling the coalition's stated objectives? An exploration of the representativeness and inclusiveness of neighbourhood forums, Town Planning Review, 89, 229, 10.3828/tpr.2018.15 Baeten, 2012, Neoliberal planning: Does it really exist?, 205 Bailey, 2010, Understanding community empowerment in urban regeneration and planning in England: Putting policy and practice in context, Planning Practice and Research, 25, 317, 10.1080/02697459.2010.503425 Baker, 2010, Getting involved in plan making: participation and stakeholder involvement in local and regional spatial strategies in England, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 574, 10.1068/c0972 Baker, 2013, The delusion of strategic spatial planning: What's left after the Labour government's English regional experiment?, Planning Practice and Research, 28, 83, 10.1080/02697459.2012.694314 Barker, 2011, Big societies, little platoons and the problems with pluralism, The Political Quarterly, 82, 50, 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02160.x Barrett, 2004, Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies, Public Administration, 82, 249, 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00393.x Barrett, 1981 Barrett, 1984, Policy, bargaining and structure in implementation theory: Towards an integrated perspective, Policy and Politics, 12, 219, 10.1332/030557384782628291 Barwell, G. (2016). Neighbourhood planning’. Written ministerial statement, 12th December 2016. Last accessed 10/08/22. Bee, 2014, Active citizenship in the UK: Assessing institutional political strategies and mechanisms of civic engagement, Journal of Civil Society, 10, 100, 10.1080/17448689.2014.895604 Birkland, 2020 Blond, 2010 Bogusz, 2018, Neighbourhood planning: national strategy for ‘bottom up’ governance, Journal of Property Planning and Environmental Law, 10, 56, 10.1108/JPPEL-01-2018-0001 Bradley, 2015, The political identities of neighbourhood planning in England, Space and Polity, 19, 97, 10.1080/13562576.2015.1046279 Bradley, 2017, Neighbourhood planning and the impact of place identity on housing development in England, Planning Theory & Practice, 18, 233, 10.1080/14649357.2017.1297478 Bradley, 2018, Neighbourhood planning and the production of spatial knowledge, Town Planning Review, 89, 23, 10.3828/tpr.2018.2 Bradley, 2017, The impact of neighbourhood planning and localism on house-building in England, Housing, Theory and Society, 34, 106, 10.1080/14036096.2016.1197852 Brownill, 2017, Assembling neighbourhoods: Topologies of power and the reshaping of planning, 145 Brownill, 2007, Increasing participation in planning: Emergent experiences of the reformed planning system in England, Planning, Practice and Research, 22, 619, 10.1080/02697450701770134 Brownill, 2019, Framing People And Planning: 50 Years Of Debate, Built Environment, 45, 7, 10.2148/benv.45.1.7 Brownill, 2010, Why bother with good works? The relevance of public participation(s) in planning in a post-collaborative era’, Planning Practice and Research, 25, 275, 10.1080/02697459.2010.503407 Buitelaar, 2020, If neoliberalism is everything, maybe it is nothing, Planning Theory, 19, 485, 10.1177/1473095220956706 Burnett, 2019 Burns, 2018 Buser, 2013, Tracing the democratic narrative: Big Society, localism and civic engagement, Local Government Studies, 39, 3, 10.1080/03003930.2012.693077 Carstensen, 2016, Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualising ideational power in discursive institutionalism, Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 318, 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534 Castree, 2006, From neoliberalism to neoliberalisation: Consolations, confusions, and necessary illusions, Environment and Planning ‘A’, 38, 1, 10.1068/a38147 Chaskin, 2012, Participation, deliberation, and decision making: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in mixed-income developments, Urban Affairs Review, 48, 863, 10.1177/1078087412450151 Clarke, 2013, Geographies and politics of localism: The localism of the United Kingdom's coalition government, Political Geography, 34, 10, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.03.003 Clifford, 2013, The collaborating planner Coenen, 2009, Local Agenda 21: ‘Meaningful and effective’ participation?, 165 Colomb, 2017, Participation and conflict in the formation of neighbourhood areas and forums in 'super-diverse' cities, 127 Community Planning Alliance [CPA] (2022). Commuinity Planning Alliance Manifesto. Located at: https://www.communityplanningalliance.org/uploads/1/3/9/4/139430416/cpa-manifesto-feb2022.pdf (accessed 20 February 2023). Conservative Party (2009). Control Shift: returning power to local communities. Conservatives, London. Conservative Party, 2010, Open source planning, Conservatives, London 2001 Corry, D. and Stoker, G. (2002). New Localism: Refashioning the Centre-Local Relationship. London, The New Local Government Network. Countryside Agency, 2003, Parish Plans. Guidance for Parish Councils, CA, Cheltenham Dąbrowski, 2018, Introduction: drawing lessons from international policy-transfer initiatives in regional and urban development and spatial planning, Regional Studies, 52, 1165, 10.1080/00343404.2018.1462490 Dalton, 2007, Preparing planners for the breadth of practice: What we need to know depends on whom we ask, Journal of the American Planning Association, 73, 35, 10.1080/01944360708976135 Dargan, 2009, Participation and local urban regeneration: The case of the New Deal for Communities (NDC) in the UK, Regional Studies, 43, 305, 10.1080/00343400701654244 Davoudi, 2017, Spatial planning: the promised land or rolled-out neoliberalism?, 15 Davoudi, 2018, Discursive Institutionalism and Planning Ideas, 2018, 61 Davoudi, 2013, Are English neighbourhood forums democratically legitimate?, Planning Theory & Practice, 14, 562, 10.1080/14649357.2013.851880 Davoudi, 2013, Localism and neo-liberal governmentality, Town Planning Review, 84, 551, 10.3828/tpr.2013.29 DCLG, 2015, [Department for Communities and Local Government] (2015) DCLG [Department for Communities and Local Government] (2016). Neighbourhood Planning: progress on housing delivery. October 2016 edition. London: DCLG. DCLG [Department for Communities and Local Government], 2008, Cm7427 DCLG [Department for Communities and Local Government], 2008 DCLG [Department for Communities and Local Government], 2010, Planning power from town halls and Whitehall to local people. DCLG, London DCLG [Department for Communities and Local Government], 2012 DCLG [Department for Communities and Local Government], 2013 DCLG [Department for Communities and Local Government] (2014). National Planning Practice Guidance – Neighbourhood Planning. Available: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/neighbourhood-planning--2 (Accessed 15 September 2020]. DLUHC [Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities] (2022) Urban and deprived areas among those chosen for planning pilots DLUHC press release [online] Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/areas-selected-for-planning-pilots-for-deprived-communities (Accessed: 25 April 2022). DLUHC, 2022, [Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities] Levelling up the United Kingdom Fearn, 2022, From post‐political to authoritarian planning in England: A crisis of legitimacy, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47, 347, 10.1111/tran.12501 Ferm, 2021, Emerging problematics of deregulating the urban: The case of permitted development in England, Urban Studies, 58, 2040, 10.1177/0042098020936966 Field, 2017, Locating community-led housing within neighbourhood plans as a response to England’s housing needs, Public Money and Management, 37, 105, 10.1080/09540962.2016.1266157 Flinders, 2013, Gap analysis: Participatory democracy, public expectations and community assemblies in sheffield, Local Government Studies, 39, 488, 10.1080/03003930.2012.751023 Fung, 2003, Vol. 4 Gallent, 2013, Re-connecting 'people and planning': parish plans and the English localism agenda, Town Planning Review, 84, 371, 10.3828/tpr.2013.20 Gallent, 2013, Localism, down-scaling and the strategic dilemmas confronting planning in England, Town Planning Review, 84, 563, 10.3828/tpr.2013.30 Gallent, 2008, Parish plans and the spatial planning approach in England, Town Planning Review, 79, 1, 10.3828/tpr.79.1.3 Galuszka, 2019, What makes urban governance co-productive? Contradictions in the current debate on co-production, Planning Theory, 18, 143, 10.1177/1473095218780535 Garner, 1979, Policy forum: Skeffington revisited, Town Planning Review, 50, 412 Ghose, 2005, The complexities of citizen participation through collaborative governance, Space and Polity, 9, 61, 10.1080/13562570500078733 Glasman, 2010, Society not state: The challenge of the big society, Public Policy Research, 17, 59, 10.1111/j.1744-540X.2010.00604.x Glasman, 2011, The big society in question, The Political Quarterly, 82, 9, 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02323.x Glass, 1979, Citizen participation in planning: The relationship between objectives and techniques, Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, 180, 10.1080/01944367908976956 Goggin, 1990, Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation, Illinois: Scottish Foresman and Co Gualini, 2010, Governance, space and politics: Exploring the governmentality of planning, 75 Gunn, 2015, The community’s capacity to plan: The disproportionate requirements of the new English Neighbourhood Planning initiative, 147 1992 Hall, 1988 Hall, 1996, Political science and the three new institutionalisms, Political Studies, 44, 936, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x Healey, 1998, Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society, Town Planning Review, 69, 1, 10.3828/tpr.69.1.h651u2327m86326p Heclo, 1974 Hildreth, 2016, The evolving roles and relationships of governments in local economic and sustainable development: the case of the united kingdom (and particularly England), 51 Hossu, 2022, Streamline democratic values in planning systems: A study of participatory practices in European strategic spatial planning, Habitat International, 129, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102675 Inch, 2018, ‘Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland, Urban Studies, 55, 1076, 10.1177/0042098016684731 Inch, 2019, People And Planning At Fifty / ‘People And Planning’ 50 Years On, Planning Theory & Practice, 20 Inch, 2022, Serving the public interest? Towards a history of private sector planning expertise in England, Planning Perspectives Innes, 2000, Public participation in planning: New strategies for the 21st century Innes, 2010 2012 Jessop, 2001, Institutional re(turns) and the strategic – relational approach, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33, 1213, 10.1068/a32183 Khan, 2020, ‘Neighbourhood Watch: Three quarters of consultants say neighbourhood plans increase resistance to development’, Planning Resource Article [Online] Available from Kim, 2011, Unimaginable Change, Journal of the American Planning Association, 77, 328, 10.1080/01944363.2011.619462 Labour Party, 2001 Laffin, 2016, Planning in England: New public management, network governance or post-democracy?, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 354, 10.1177/0020852315581807 Lambert, 2006, Community strategies and spatial planning in England: The challenges of integration, Planning, Practice and Research, 21, 245, 10.1080/02697450600944723 2022 Laurian, 2009, Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning, Planning Theory and Practice, 10, 369, 10.1080/14649350903229810 Lawless, 2012, Outcomes from community engagement in urban regeneration: Evidence from England's New Deal for Communities programme, Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 509, 10.1080/14649357.2012.728003 Dobson, M. & Parker, G. (2023). The moral economy of localism in England: neighbourhood planning as neoliberal ‘apprentice piece’. Territory, Politics, Governance. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2023.2184856. LCC [Leicester Community Council] (2014). Neighbourhood planning champions. NP webpages: https://www.leicestershirecommunities.org.uk/np/useful-information.html (last accessed 24 May 2022). Lee, 2022, Neighbourhood Planning, rural ageing and public health policy in England: a case of Policy Myopia?, Town Planning Review, 93, 275, 10.3828/tpr.2021.39 Legacy, 2019, Beyond the post-political: Exploring the relational and situated dynamics of consensus and conflict in planning, Planning Theory, 18, 273, 10.1177/1473095219845628 Leon, 2020, Technology as ideology in urban governance, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110, 497, 10.1080/24694452.2019.1660139 Letwin, 2018, Independent review of build-out. Final report Lichfields, 2017, Planned and deliver Lichfields, 2021, Taking stock. The geography of housing need, permissions and completions, May 2021 London: Lichfields Lister, 2015, Citizens, doing it for themselves? The big society and government through community, Parliamentary Affairs, 68, 352, 10.1093/pa/gst025 Locality (2015). Technical support eligibility https://neighbourhoodplanning.org/about/technical-support/ (Accessed 10 August 2022). Lord, 2017, The planners’ dream goes wrong?’ Questioning citizen-centred planning, Local Government Studies, 43, 344, 10.1080/03003930.2017.1288618 Lord, 2014, Is planning “Under Attack”? Chronicling the deregulation of urban and environmental planning in England, European Planning Studies, 22, 345, 10.1080/09654313.2012.741574 Lord, 2018, Getting the planners off our backs: Questioning the post-political nature of english planning policy, Planning Practice and Research, 33, 229 Lowndes, 2012, Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘Big Society’, Local Government Studies, 38, 21, 10.1080/03003930.2011.642949 Lowndes, 2001, Trends in public participation: Part 1–local government perspectives, Public Administration, 79, 205, 10.1111/1467-9299.00253 Lowndes, 2013 Lupton, 2013, What is neighbourhood renewal policy for?, People Place and Policy, 7, 66 Marinetto, 2003, Who wants to be an active citizen? The politics and practice of community involvement, Sociology, 37, 103, 10.1177/0038038503037001390 Marres, 2007, The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy, Social Studies of Science, 37, 759, 10.1177/0306312706077367 Marshall, 2016, Infrastructure, planning and the command of time, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 1843, 10.1177/0263774X16642768 May, 1992, Policy learning and failure, Journal of Public Policy, 12, 331, 10.1017/S0143814X00005602 Mazmanian, 1981, Liberalism, environmentalism, and partisanship in public policy-making: The California Coastal Commissions, Environment and Behavior, 13, 361, 10.1177/0013916581133007 McConnell, 2010, Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between, Journal of Public Policy, 30, 345, 10.1017/S0143814X10000152 McGinnis, 2014, Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges, Ecology and Society, 19, 1, 10.5751/ES-06387-190230 Metzger, 2017, The legitimization of concern: A flexible framework for investigating the enactment of stakeholders in environmental planning and governance processes, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49, 2517, 10.1177/0308518X17727284 MHCLG (2021) Two funds to support the uptake of neighbourhood planning’ MHCLG funding call [online] Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/neighbourhood-planning-two-funds-to-support-greater-uptake/two-funds-to-support-the-uptake-of-neighbourhood-planning [Accessed: 25 April 2022]. MHCLG [Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government] (2020a). ‘New funding boost to help communities plan their neighbourhood’ Press release 10th August 2020: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/funding-boost-to-help-communities-plan-their-neighbourhoods. MHCLG [Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government], 2020 Miraftab, 2012, Planning and citizenship, 1180 Monno, 2012, Tokenism or political activism? Some reflections on participatory planning, International Planning Studies, 17, 85, 10.1080/13563475.2011.638181 Morphet, 2020 Moulaert, 2016, Agency, structure, institutions, discourse (ASID) in urban and regional development, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 20, 167, 10.1080/12265934.2016.1182054 Moulaert, 2019 Moyson, 2017, Policy learning and policy change: theorizing their relations from different perspectives, Policy and Society, 36, 161, 10.1080/14494035.2017.1331879 Nair, 2017, Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: Adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty, Policy and Politics, 45, 103, 10.1332/030557316X14788776017743 NAO [National Audit Office] (2013). Data assurance summary report – DCLG. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/10229–008_DCLG_Data-summary-sheet.pdf [last accessed 24/05/22]. Natarajan, 2019, Perspectives on scale in participatory spatial planning, Built Environment, 45, 230, 10.2148/benv.45.2.230 Newman, 2012 Newman, 2014, Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity, Urban Studies, 51, 3290, 10.1177/0042098013505159 ODPM [Office of the Deputy Prime Minister] Statements of Community Involvement and Planning Applications. ODPM London 2004. Ostrom, 2011, Background on the institutional analysis and development framework, Policy Studies Journal, 39, 7, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x Parker, 2008, Parish and community-led planning, local empowerment and local evidence bases: An examination of 'good practice' in West Berkshire, Town Planning Review, 79, 61, 10.3828/tpr.79.1.5 Parker, 2014, Engaging neighbourhoods: Experiences of transactive planning with communities, in England, 177 Parker, 2021 Parker, 2022, Governmental logics in commercialised planning practices: The case of local authority pre-application discussions in the English planning system, Planning Theory and Practice, 23, 60, 10.1080/14649357.2021.2011388 Parker, 2020, Entangling voluntarism, leisure time and political work: the governmentalities of neighbourhood planning in England, Leisure Studies, 39, 644, 10.1080/02614367.2020.1763440 Parker, 2014 Parker, 2015, Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England, Town Planning Review, 86, 519, 10.3828/tpr.2015.31 Parker, 2017, Contestation and conservatism in neighbourhood planning in england: reconciling agonism and collaboration?, Planning Theory and Practice, 17, 446, 10.1080/14649357.2017.1316514 Parker, 2017, Taking stock of neighbourhood planning in England 2011–2016, Planning Practice and Research, 32, 478, 10.1080/02697459.2017.1378983 Parker, 2022, Levelling up neighbourhoods: Back to the very local future?, Town and Country Planning, 91, 99 Parker, 2020 Parson, 1995, Sustainable development as social learning: Theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the design of a research program, 42 Peck, 2013, Explaining (with) neoliberalism, Territory, Politics, Governance, 1, 132, 10.1080/21622671.2013.785365 Peck, 2019, Still neoliberalism?, South Atlantic Quarterly, 118, 245, 10.1215/00382876-7381122 Pickles, 2012, HC Debate, 6 September 2012, column, Vol. 549, 405 Pill, 2021, Neighbourhood collaboration in co-production: state-resourced responsiveness or state-retrenched responsibilisation?, Policy Studies, 1 Powell, 2021, The levelling-up agenda, House of Commons Library, Research Briefing Raco, 2003, New Labour, community and the future of Britain's urban renaissance, 235 Raco, 2009, From expectations to aspirations: State modernisation, urban policy, and the existential politics of welfare in the UK, Political Geography, 28, 436, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.10.009 Raco, 2006, Reshaping spaces of local governance? Community strategies and the modernisation of local government in England, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 475, 10.1068/c51m Root, 2007 Rose, 2004 Sabatier, 1988, Advocacy-Coalition Framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning’, Policy Sciences, 21, 129, 10.1007/BF00136406 Sabatier, 1993 Sager, 2011, Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010, Progress in Planning, 76, 147 Sager, 2016, Activist planning: A response to the woes of neo-liberalism?, European Planning Studies, 24, 1262, 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168784 2018 Salter, 2018, Caught in the middle? The response of local planning authorities to neighbourhood planning in England, Town and Country Planning, 87, 344 Salter, 2022, Emergent practices of localism: The role and response of local planning authorities to neighbourhood planning in England, Town Planning Review, 93, 37, 10.3828/tpr.2021.7 Salter, 2022, Localism and the will to housing: Neighbourhood Development Plans and their role in local housing site delivery in England, Planning Practice and Research, 1 Schmidt, 2008, Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342 Schmidt, 2010, Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’, European Political Science Review, 2, 1, 10.1017/S175577390999021X Simon, 1991, Bounded rationality and organizational learning, Organization Science, 2, 125, 10.1287/orsc.2.1.125 Smith, 2009 Sorensen, 2015, Taking path dependence seriously: An historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history, Planning Perspectives, 30, 17, 10.1080/02665433.2013.874299 Sorensen, 2017, New institutionalism and planning theory, 250 Sorensen, 2014, Collaborative policy innovation: Problems and potential, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 19, 1 Stanier, 2014, Local heroes: Neighbourhood planning in practice, Journal of Planning and Environment Law Occasional Paper, Issue 13, 105 Sturzaker, 2017, Democratic tensions in decentralised planning, Rhetoric, legislation and Reality in England Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35, 1324 Sturzaker, 2020 Syed, 2019 Tait, 2016, Putting localism in place: Conservative images of the good community and the contradictions of planning reform in England, Planning Practice & Research, 31, 174, 10.1080/02697459.2015.1104219 Talen, 1996, Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 10, 248, 10.1177/088541229601000302 Tarrow, 1994, Power in movement: social movements Taylor, 2019, Pathways to legitimacy, Planning Theory, 18, 214, 10.1177/1473095218806929 TCPA [Town and Country Planning Association] (2020). The wrong answers to the wrong questions. Countering the misconceptions driving the Government’s planning reform agenda. August 2020. TCPA, London. Tewdwr-Jones, 2006, The contested strategies of local governance: Community strategies, development plans and local government modernisation, Environment and Planning A, 38, 533, 10.1068/a37308 Thompson, 2019, Playing with the rules of the game: Social innovation for urban transformation, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43, 1168, 10.1111/1468-2427.12663 Van der Heijden, J, 2011, Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept, Politics, 31, 9, 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01397.x 2007 Vigar, 2017, Governing our neighbours: Participation and conflict in neighbourhood planning, Town Planning Review, 88, 423, 10.3828/tpr.2017.27 Wargent, 2021, Localism, governmentality and failing technologies: The case of Neighbourhood Planning in England, Territory Politics Governance, 9, 571, 10.1080/21622671.2020.1737209 Wargent, 2018, Re-imagining neighbourhood governance: the future of neighbourhood planning in England, Town Planning Review, 89, 379, 10.3828/tpr.2018.23 Wesselink, 2011, Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: Practitioners' perspectives, Environment and Planning A, 43, 2688, 10.1068/a44161 Williams, 2014, Neoliberalism, big society, and progressive localism, Environment and Planning A, 46, 2798, 10.1068/a130119p Wills, 2016, Emerging geographies of English localism: The case of neighbourhood planning, Political Geography, 53, 43, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.02.001 Winter, 2012, Implementation perspectives: Status and reconsideration, 265 Wright, 2022, Reframing community (dis) engagement: The discursive connection between undemocratic policy enactment, minoritized communities and resistance, Journal of Education Policy, 37, 186, 10.1080/02680939.2020.1777467 Yuille, A. (Forthcoming) Beyond Neighbourhood Planning: Knowledge, Care, Legitimacy. Bristol: Policy Press. Yuille, 2020, Performing legitimacy in neighbourhood planning: Conflicting identities and hybrid governance, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38, 1367 Yuille, 2021, Contradictory cares in community-led planning, Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, Special Issue ‘Care in STS: objects, transformations and politics’, 9, 39 Zanotto, 2020, ‘Neoliberalism: Throw it around or throw it away?, Planning Theory, 19, 489, 10.1177/1473095220956707