Negotiation processes, Evolutionary Systems Design, and NEGOTIATOR
Tóm tắt
A negotiation accord is often the result of an intense, laborious, and evolutionary negotiation process. During this process, disputing parties are confronted with goal, judgment, and outcome conflict. This article demonstrates the utility of a conflict resolution framework—Evolutionary Systems Design (ESD)—by using a Negotiation Support System. ESD seeks to guide negotiators to move their individual goals and judgments in such a way as to enhance the chance of achieving a common solution. As illustrated by the use of NEGOTIATOR, a multiattribute utility negotiation support system, we argue that computer mediation can prove to be an effective means to implement the ESD framework.
Tài liệu tham khảo
BarclayS., and C. R.Peterson. (1976). “Multi-attribute Utility Models for Negotiation.” McLean, VA: Decisions and Design, Inc.
Bazerman, S. (1983). “Negotiator's Judgment: A Critical Look at the Rationality Assumption,”American Behavioral Scientist 27.
Binbasioglu, M., T. Bui, and P. C. Ma. (1995) “An Action-Resrouce Language for Argumentation: The Case of Softwood Lumber Negotiation.” InProceedings of the Twenty-eighth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Vol. 4. IEEE Society Press. pp. 262–269.
Bui, T., and T. Sivasankaran. (1990) “Fuzzy Preferences in Bilateral Negotiation Support Systems,” InProceedings of the Twenty-fourth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Vol. 4. IEEE Society Press, pp. 687–694.
Bui, T. (1993). “Designing Multiple Criteria Negotiations Support Systems: Frameworks, Issues and Implementation.” In Tzeng et al.,MCDM: Expand and Enrich the Domains of Thinking and Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics and Economical Sciences. Springer Verlag.
Bui, T., P. C. Ma, and C. Stricker (1995). “Supporting Argumentation in Software Development.” Working paper, Department of Information and Systems Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
KeeneyR. L., and H.Raiffa (1991). “Structuring and Analyzing Values for Multiple-Issue Negotiations.” In H. P.Young (ed.),Negotiation Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 131–151.
LaxD. A., and J. K.Sebenius (1986).The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: Free Press.
MaslowA. G. (1954).Motivation and Personality, New York: Harper & Row.
Rhee, H.-S., H. Pirkul, V. Jacob, and R. Barhki. “Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication on Group Negotiation: An Empirical Study.” InProceedings of the Twenty-eighth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Vol. 4. IEEE Society Press, pp. 270–279.
RokeachM. (1973).The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
ShakunM. F. (1988).Evolutionary Systems Design: Policy Making under Complexity and Group Decision Support Systems. Oakland, CA: Holden-Day.
ShakunM. F. (1990). “Group Decision and Negotiation Support in Evolving Nonshared Information Contexts,”Theory and Decision 28 (3), 275–288.
ShakunM. F. (1991). “Airline Buyout: Evolutionary Systems Design and Problem Restructuring in Group Decision and Negotiation,”Management Science 37(10), 1291–1303.
ShakunM. F. (1992). “Defining a Right Problem in Group Decision and Negotiation: Feeling and Evolutionary Generating Procedures,”Group Decision and Negotiation 1(1), 27–40.
Shakun, M. F. (1995). “Modeling and Supporting Task-Oriented Group Processes: Purposeful Complex Adaptive Systems and Evolutionary Systems Design,”Group Decision and Negotiation 5(4–6).
SheppardB. H. (1984), “Third Party Conflict Intervention: A Procedural Framework.” In Staw and Cummings (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
ThomasK. (1992). “Conflict and Negotiation Processes in Organizations.” In Dunnette (ed.),Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Thomas, K., and Pondy, L. (1977). “Toward an ‘Intent’ Model of Conflict Management Among Principle Parties,”Human Relations 30.